Retinal abnormalities (RA) are very frequently observed in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but the clinical significance of these findings has not been fully investigated. We examined the fundus oculi in a cohort of 122 adult patients with AML at presentation and analyzed some clinical and biological features to assess whether there was any association with RA. For this purpose, we subdivided the patients into two groups according to the presence or absence of RA (groups 1 and 2, respectively). We considered current laboratory parameters such as white blood cell (WBC) count, hemoglobin (Hb), platelets and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Moreover, we subdivided the patients into two groups according to age <60 (group A) or ≧60 years (group B) to evaluate a possible association between RA and response to treatment and/or overall survival (OS). In our series, a higher median age and a lower Hb value were associated with group 1 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.04, respectively); the median LDH value was 812 U/l (range 224–5,551) and 607 (range 181–5,244) for groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.02). There was no association between RA and karyotypic alterations. In terms of outcome, in group A (<60 years), 80% patients who achieved complete remission (CR) were in group 2 vs. 13% nonresponders (NR) (p < 0.0001). Median OS of group 2 patients was 49.7 months compared with 7.2 months for those in group 1 (p = 0.002). In group B, 58% patients who achieved CR were in group 1 vs. 15% NR (p < 0.006). Median OS of patients in group 2 was 14.6 months compared with 2.9 months in group 1 (p = 0.02). Our data show that RA are significantly associated with some biological features and with shorter OS in AML patients and this parameter seems to be an effective clinical sign of poor prognosis in terms of CR.

Keywords:
Acute myeloid leukemia, Retinal abnormalities, Prognostic factors
© 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
2001
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.