...), respectively. The two LBC methods showed comparable sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for histologic HSIL+ (SP: sensitivity 82.8%, specificity 84.8%, and AUC 0.838; WP: sensitivity 79.3%, specificity 87.0%, and AUC 0.831). No significant difference was found regarding the sensitivity...

... by two researchers, with a consensus reached among the authors in cases of conflict. The risk of bias and applicability were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Sensitivity and specificity at each diagnostic cut-off were assessed by bivariate generalized linear mixed-model meta-analysis. The area under...

...% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively. The pooled diagnostic accuracy for the cytological diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma resulted in a sensitivity of 84% (79–88%) and a specificity of 90% (84–94%). The I 2 values were 69 and 86% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively. Conclusion: Accuracy...

... and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements. sputum lung neoplasms sensitivity and specificity brush cytology Acta Cytologica Comparison of the Sensitivity...

..., Tutorials of Cytology, 1994, pp 320 334 10. Koss LG, Lin E, Schreiber K, Elgert P, Mango L: Evaluation of the PAPNET cytologic screening system for quality control of cervical smears. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;101:220-229 cervical smears cervix neoplasms mass screening sensitivity and specificity PAPNET...

... responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements. Papanicolaou smear automation sensitivity and specificity AutoPap® PapMap Location-Guided Screening Acta Cytologica Sensitivity Studies...