Rapid Pre-Screening Is More Sensitive in Liquid-Based Cytology than in Conventional Smears | Citedby Results | Acta Cytologica | Karger Publishers

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Rapid Pre-Screening Is More Sensitive in Liquid-Based Cytology than in Conventional Smears

Acta Cytologica (2011) 55 (1): 54–56.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

Technological advances: Have they improved standards? Review of outcomes from the Welsh cervical screening programme

Alejandra Castanon

Journal of Medical Screening (2021) 28 (2): 80.

Internal Quality Control for Cervical Cytopathology: Comparison of Potential False-Negatives Detected at Rapid Prescreening and at 100% Rapid Review

Suelene Brito do Nascimento Tavares
Nádja L. Alves de Souza
Edna J.C. Manrique
Cinara Zago Silveira Ázara
Erika Aparecida da Silveira
Rita Goreti Amaral

Acta Cytologica (2014) 58 (5): 439.

Changing the cytology laboratory information system to improve cytology performance

Andrew A. Renshaw
George G. Birdsong

Cancer Cytopathology (2014) 122 (2): 87.

Análisis de coste-efectividad de la prueba de citología cervicovaginal

Antonio Olry de Labry Lima
David Epstein
Leticia García Mochón
Jesús Ruiz Aragón
Jaime Espín Balbino

Progresos de Obstetricia y Ginecología (2012) 55 (7): 304.

Effectiveness of Rapid Prescreening and 10% Rescreening in Liquid-Based Papanicolaou Testing

Heather S. Currens
Katharine Nejkauf
Lynn Wagner
Stephen S. Raab

American Journal of Clinical Pathology (2012) 137 (1): 150.

Improvement in the routine screening of cervical smears

Suelene Brito Nascimento Tavares
Nadja L. Alves de Sousa
Edna J. C. Manrique
Zair B. Pinheiro de Albuquerque
Luiz C. Zeferino
Rita G. Amaral

Cancer Cytopathology (2011) 119 (6): 367.

Rapid prescreening in gynecologic cytology

Manon Auger

Cancer Cytopathology (2011) 119 (6): 357.