Internal Quality Control for Cervical Cytopathology: Comparison of Potential False-Negatives Detected at Rapid Prescreening and at 100% Rapid Review | Citedby Results | Acta Cytologica | Karger Publishers

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Internal Quality Control for Cervical Cytopathology: Comparison of Potential False-Negatives Detected at Rapid Prescreening and at 100% Rapid Review

Acta Cytologica (2014) 58 (5): 439–445.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

Cervical cancer: Automation of Pap test screening

Mariana T. Rezende
Andrea G. C. Bianchi
Cláudia M. Carneiro

Diagnostic Cytopathology (2021) 49 (4): 559.

Cric searchable image database as a public platform for conventional pap smear cytology data

Mariana T. Rezende
Raniere Silva
Fagner de O. Bernardo
Alessandra H. G. Tobias
Paulo H. C. Oliveira
Tales M. Machado
Caio S. Costa
Fatima N. S. Medeiros
Daniela M. Ushizima
Claudia M. Carneiro
Andrea G. C. Bianchi

Scientific Data (2021) 8 (1)

Sample Adequacy Control (SAC) Lowers False Negatives and Increases the Quality of Screening: Introduction of “Non-Competitive” SAC for qPCR Assays

Ivan Brukner
Alex Resendes
Shaun Eintracht
Andreas Papadakis
Matthew Oughton

Diagnostics (2021) 11 (7): 1133.

Liquid-Based Screening Tests Results: HPV, Liquid-Based Cytology, and P16/Ki67 Dual-Staining in Private-Based Opportunistic Cervical Cancer Screening

Martyna Trzeszcz
Maciej Mazurec
Robert Jach
Karolina Mazurec
Zofia Jach
Izabela Kotkowska-Szeps
Magdalena Kania
Mariola Wantuchowicz
Anna Prokopyk
Piotr Barcikowski
Marcin Przybylski
Joanna Wach
Agnieszka Halon

Diagnostics (2021) 11 (8): 1420.

Benefit of double‐reading cytology smears as a triage strategy among high‐risk human papillomavirus–positive women in Mexico

Paula Ramírez‐Palacios
Aiyu Chen
Yvonne N. Flores
Catherine M. Crespi
Eduardo Lazcano‐Ponce
Daniel Alvarez‐Escobedo
Leticia Torres‐Ibarra
Berenice Rivera‐Paredez
Leith León‐Maldonado
Rubí Hernández‐López
Indira R. Mendiola‐Pastrana
Pablo Méndez‐Hernández
Jack Cuzick
Enrique Carmona
Héctor Figueroa
Fernando Montiel‐Cordero
Joacim Meneses‐León
Jianyu Rao
Jorge Salmerón

Cancer Cytopathology (2020) 128 (10): 715.

Exploring avenues for best use of cytotechnologists in non‐gynaecological cytology: Double screening or independent sign‐out

G. Fischer
M. Haddad
K. Cormier

Cytopathology (2018) 29 (1): 90.

Performance of rapid prescreening and 100% rapid review as internal quality control methods for cervical cytopathology

A. H. G. Tobias
A. C. Vitalino
M. T. Rezende
R. R. R. Oliveira
W. Coura‐Vital
R. G. Amaral
C. M. Carneiro

Cytopathology (2018) 29 (5): 428.

Comparison of Cervicovaginal Cytopathological Samples Collected in Basic Health Units and in Private Clinics in the Midwest of Santa Catarina

Bárbara Dallazem
Bibiana Paula Dambrós
Conrado de Oliveira Gamba
Marcelo Perazzoli
Alexandre Kirschnick

Revista Brasileira de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia / RBGO Gynecology and Obstetrics (2018) 40 (02): 086.

Does 100% Rapid Review Improve Cervical Cancer Screening?

José Queiroz Filho
José Eleutério, Jr.
Ricardo Ney Cobucci
Janaina Cristiana de Oliveira Crispim
Paulo César Giraldo
Ana Katherine Gonçalves

Acta Cytologica (2018) 62 (3): 209.

Internal quality control indicators in cervical cytopathology of a university laboratory

L. I. Cardoso Filho
S. B. N. Tavares
M. L. B. Siqueira
E. N. dos Passos
N. L. A. S. Araújo
J. M. A. Martins
A. A. Ribeiro
S. H. R. dos Santos

Cytopathology (2018) 29 (4): 355.