Team Reading (Peer Review) of Suspicious/Positive Slides for Continuous Quality Improvement in Cervical-Vaginal Cytology: A Comparison between Methods and Indicators | Citedby Results | Acta Cytologica | Karger Publishers

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Team Reading (Peer Review) of Suspicious/Positive Slides for Continuous Quality Improvement in Cervical-Vaginal Cytology: A Comparison between Methods and Indicators

Acta Cytologica (2016) 60 (5): 458–464.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

The impact of blind peer review (team reading) of equivocal/abnormal Papanicolaou smears on inter‐reader agreement

Antonio Placidi
Paolo Giorgi Rossi

Cytopathology (2019) 30 (1): 105.