Comparison of False Negative Rates Between 100% Rapid Review and 10% Random Full Rescreening as Internal Quality Control Methods in Cervical Cytology Screening | Citedby Results | Acta Cytologica | Karger Publishers

Skip to Main Content

Skip Nav Destination

Comparison of False Negative Rates Between 100% Rapid Review and 10% Random Full Rescreening as Internal Quality Control Methods in Cervical Cytology Screening

Acta Cytologica (2009) 53 (3): 271–276.

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in CrossRef Cited-by Linking.

Performance of rapid prescreening and 100% rapid review as internal quality control methods for cervical cytopathology

A. H. G. Tobias
A. C. Vitalino
M. T. Rezende
R. R. R. Oliveira
W. Coura‐Vital
R. G. Amaral
C. M. Carneiro

Cytopathology (2018) 29 (5): 428.

Trends in Cervical Cytology Screening and Reporting Practices: Results From the College of American Pathologists 2011 PAP Education Supplemental Questionnaire

Barbara A. Crothers
Teresa M. Darragh
Rosemary H. Tambouret
Ritu Nayar
Guliz A. Barkan
Chengquan Zhao
Christine Noga Booth
Vijayalakshmi Padmanabhan
Z. Laura Tabatabai
Rhona J. Souers
Nicole Thomas
David C. Wilbur
Ann T. Moriarty

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (2016) 140 (1): 13.

NILM Pap Slides From Women 30 Years of Age and Older With Positive High-Risk HPV DNA

Karen Cormier
Michael Schaaf
Stephanie Hamilton
Ronald J. Tickman
Nuria Perez-Reyes
Charles D. Sturgis

American Journal of Clinical Pathology (2014) 141 (4): 494.

Prospective and Retrospective Review of Gynecologic Cytopathology: Findings From the College of American Pathologists Gynecologic Cytopathology Quality Consensus Conference Working Group 2

Jennifer A. Brainard
George G. Birdsong
Tarik M. Elsheikh
David A. Hartley
Kalyani Naik
Margaret H. Neal
Rhona J. Souers
Michael R. Henry

Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine (2013) 137 (2): 175.

Focused rescreening of NILM Pap slides from women ≥30 years of age with positive high risk HPV DNA: An enhanced quality control measure

Charles D. Sturgis
Michael R. Schaaf
Ronald J. Tickman

Diagnostic Cytopathology (2013) 41 (5): 399.

Rapid prescreen of cervical liquid‐based cytology preparations: Results of a study in an academic medical center

William J. Frable
Mary Ann Pedigo
Celeste N. Powers
Cheryl Yarrell
Becky Ortiz
Mary E. Clark
Tameka Ebron

Diagnostic Cytopathology (2012) 40 (8): 691.

Effectiveness of Rapid Prescreening and 10% Rescreening in Liquid-Based Papanicolaou Testing

Heather S. Currens
Katharine Nejkauf
Lynn Wagner
Stephen S. Raab

American Journal of Clinical Pathology (2012) 137 (1): 150.

Desempenho da metodologia de revisão rápida de 100% em esfregaços citopatológicos do colo do útero com e sem informações clínicas

Edna Joana Cláudio Manrique
Nadja Lindany Alves Souza
Suelene Brito do Nascimento Tavares
Luiz Carlos Zeferino
Rita Goreti Amaral

Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz (2012) 71 (1): 172.

Improvement in the routine screening of cervical smears

Suelene Brito Nascimento Tavares
Nadja L. Alves de Sousa
Edna J. C. Manrique
Zair B. Pinheiro de Albuquerque
Luiz C. Zeferino
Rita G. Amaral

Cancer Cytopathology (2011) 119 (6): 367.

Analysis of the performance of 100% rapid review using an average time of 1 and 2 minutes according to the quality of cervical cytology specimens

E. J. C. Manrique
N. L. A. Souza
S. B. N. Tavares
Z. B. P. Albuquerque
L. C. Zeferino
R. G. Amaral

Cytopathology (2011) 22 (3): 195.