Background: Thyroid nodules are prevalent among the general population, thus imposing substantial demands upon healthcare providers to establish effective management paradigms when investigating these lesions. A pivotal component in the diagnostic process involves the cytomorphological evaluation of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens extracted from the nodule under scrutiny. This examination serves the critical purpose of enabling a comprehensive assessment for the risk of either a neoplasm or malignancy, thereby providing the clinical team with the requisite information to render decisions regarding potential surgical intervention and/or a structured clinical follow-up. A subset of FNA specimens obtained from the thyroid gland present a vexing challenge for interpretation and cannot be classified based on cytomorphology as either benign or malignant and are classified as “indeterminate” for neoplasm or malignancy. The indeterminate thyroid FNA diagnosis in the third iteration of the Bethesda classification is termed as “atypia of undetermined significance” (AUS). Summary: The thyroid FNA specimens classified as “atypical” constitute a perplexing category, necessitating considerations such as repeated cytological evaluations, supplementary molecular analyses, diagnostic lobectomy, or vigilant surveillance. This review article draws upon the most recent Bethesda classification guidelines and delineates various potential pitfalls encountered during the interpretation of atypia observed in thyroid fine-needle aspiration and histopathologic counterparts. Additionally, it proffers strategic algorithms devised to effectively navigate these diagnostic challenges. Key Messages: It is important to recognize the value of an integrated approach when triaging AUS lesions, considering various clinical, morphological, and sometimes also immunocytochemical or molecular features.

The emergence of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) marked a groundbreaking leap in the realm of thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). This innovative reporting system employed a simplified, 6-category format, ushered in a new era of standardized thyroid cytopathology reporting. The first two editions of TBSRTC, introduced in 2010 and further refined in 2017, garnered widespread acceptance within the global medical community. In recent years, a series of pivotal developments have unfolded within the field of thyroid pathology, profoundly impacting clinical practice. First, a 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of thyroid tumors has emerged, introducing substantial changes to nomenclature and taxonomy [1, 2]. Second, molecular testing based on molecular profiling of thyroid lesions has ascended as a useful tool in clinical practice, offering invaluable insights into the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic strategies for thyroid cancer. Its growing significance underscores its potential to revolutionize the management of thyroid malignancies. Furthermore, clinical guidelines continue to evolve. Notably, surveillance strategies are gaining prominence as a scientifically grounded approach, particularly for managing subsets of indolent lesions. This shift reflects a paradigmatic transformation in our approach to patient care and underscores the importance of evidence-based management.

Considering the above-mentioned transformative developments, the third edition of the TBSRTC was propelled into existence in 2023 [3]. This updated edition is poised to serve as a vital resource in navigating the evolving landscape of thyroid pathology, providing clinicians and pathologists with the tools necessary to adapt to these progressive changes. The 2023 edition of TBSRTC presents a streamlined set of six reporting category names: I: nondiagnostic, II: benign, III: atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), IV: follicular neoplasm, V: suspicious for malignancy, and VI: malignant [3]. The previous version of this algorithm included alternative names for half of the categories, and these have now been omitted (“unsatisfactory” in category I, “follicular lesion of undetermined significance” in category III, and “suspicious for a follicular neoplasm” in category IV). Moreover, the TBSRTC now recommends that the actual category names are reported along with their numerical designations. This practice serves to prevent any potential confusion, especially when juxtaposed with imaging algorithms such as the Thyroid Imaging and Reporting System (TIRADS) [4].

The inherent robustness of the TBSRTC system resides in its commitment to objective reporting and its capacity to amass prospective series from multiple institutions, enabling the comprehensive analysis of histologic outcomes in patients who underwent surgical procedures. Notably, considering the significant body of extensive research published after the unveiling of the 2017 TBSRTC guidelines, the 2023 TBSRTC reporting scheme incorporates novel data related to the “risk of malignancy” (ROM) specific to each category [3]. While the mean ROM is low for TBSRTC categories I and II (13% and 4%, respectively) and high for categories IV and VI (74% and 97%, respectively), diagnostic categories III and IV remain inadequate in terms of triaging cases for surgery, with ROM at 22% and 30%, respectively. However, it is important to acknowledge the inevitable risk of selection bias, as not all thyroid lesions in the categories II–III undergo surgical excision.

In thyroid cytology, a perplexing conundrum presents itself in the form of the enigmatic “gray zone” inhabited by indeterminate FNAC, concentrated in TBSRTC categories III–IV. While most thyroid lesions can be confidently classified as either benign (TBSRTC II) or malignant (TBSRTC VI), a sizeable cohort of nodules falls within the uncertain realm of indeterminate categorization. The most clinically challenging lesions in terms of indeterminate FNAC associate to the Bethesda category III/AUS, a group that may represent a wide spectrum of atypical cellular features, spanning from architectural to cellular variations. What unites these atypical findings is their shared occurrence in both benign and malignant entities, and even though these features may not alone suffice to warrant a Bethesda VI category diagnosis, they raise legitimate concerns regarding the potential nonbenign nature of the lesion in question [5, 6]. The significant consequence of overcalling thyroid FNAC specimens as “atypical” can lead to unwarranted surgical interventions, which not only pose risks to patients but also burden the healthcare monies. It is therefore an imperative mandate for the practicing diagnostician to maintain a keen awareness of both the common and less recognized pitfalls that permeate the landscape of thyroid cytopathology. This awareness is essential in navigating the intricate web of diagnostic challenges while ensuring accurate patient care.

The term “atypia” within the context of TBSRTC III-AUS encompasses a spectrum of nuclear and architectural changes that collectively are not sufficient to render to classify thyroid FNA specimens as TBSRTC categories IV–VI. In general, thyroid FNA specimens that are categorized as AUS exhibit one of the following: (a) group of cells exhibiting mild to moderate nuclear atypia either in the form of nuclear pleomorphism or features reminiscent of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) and (b) cells arranged in microfollicles, solid, trabecular, or papillary formations (architectural atypia) (Fig. 1, 2) [3, 7]. These atypical features come with their associated pitfalls, and care must be taken not to overinterpret subtle findings as malignant. In addition to nuclear and architectural atypia, various unusual findings in other cellular or stromal elements may also serve as the reason for an AUS diagnosis.

Fig. 1.

Examples of cellular and architectural atypia in FNAC of Bethesda III category diagnoses ultimately confirmed benign by histopathology.

Fig. 1.

Examples of cellular and architectural atypia in FNAC of Bethesda III category diagnoses ultimately confirmed benign by histopathology.

Close modal
Fig. 2.

Histologic features associated with cellular and architectural atypia in FNAC.

Fig. 2.

Histologic features associated with cellular and architectural atypia in FNAC.

Close modal

While this review primarily emphasizes TBSRTC, it is essential to underscore that various national thyroid FNA cytological classification schemes, such as those employed in the UK and Italy, have undergone extensive validation through meta-analyses. These validations include calculations of the ROM for all diagnostic categories, with a particular focus on indeterminate categories. The Italian system subdivides indeterminate nodules based on atypical features; a similar strategy has also been incorporated in the 3rd edition of TBSRTC. In contrast, the UK system (UK RCPath) consolidates cases with nuclear and architectural atypia into a single category [8]. In the following sections, different types of atypia are listed, along with their clinical implications.

Nuclear/Cellular Atypia

Thyroid FNA specimens classified as AUS based on nuclear atypia are associated with a higher ROM as compared to cases with isolated architectural atypia [9‒12]. Several studies have compared the ROM in which FNAC samples were subdivided based on whether they exhibited nuclear and/or architectural atypia, in which combined nuclear and architectural atypia has the highest ROM and is often shown to represent PTC on the histologic follow-up. However, isolated nuclear atypia has a somewhat lower ROM, and the ROM for cases with architectural atypia is generally much lower [9, 13, 14]. A similar trend has also been observed in thyroid FNA specimens from pediatric patients, where it was observed that the nuclear atypia as opposed to architectural atypia exhibited a clear-cut association with malignancy [15].

The idea that nuclear atypia carries the greatest significance regarding the ROM aligns harmoniously with the molecular characteristics of AUS lesions. Within this context, instances featuring nuclear atypia demonstrate a heightened occurrence of BRAF mutations (Fig. 3) [9, 16]. Conversely, low-risk genetic anomalies typically associated with benign tumors, such as KRAS and PTEN mutations, as well as PAX8::PPARG fusions, were found to be more prevalent in cases characterized solely by follicular patterned tumors, leading to microfollicles in FNA specimens, i.e., architectural atypia [9].

Fig. 3.

Cellular/nuclear and architectural features in a BRAF V600E-driven, classic PTC compared to NRAS-mutated NIFTPs. Note the prominent nuclear atypia and clear-cut papillary architecture in the fine-needle aspirate of a classic PTC compared to the subtle nuclear and architectural atypia with microfollicles of an NIFTP.

Fig. 3.

Cellular/nuclear and architectural features in a BRAF V600E-driven, classic PTC compared to NRAS-mutated NIFTPs. Note the prominent nuclear atypia and clear-cut papillary architecture in the fine-needle aspirate of a classic PTC compared to the subtle nuclear and architectural atypia with microfollicles of an NIFTP.

Close modal

In the AUS category, slight-to-moderate nuclear changes are allowed, such as mild nuclear enlargement, overlapping, nuclear membrane irregularities, and chromatin clearing (Fig. 1). The reason for a good proportion of noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTPs) is preoperatively diagnosed as AUS (Fig. 3) [17]. The finding of multiple, bona fide nuclear pseudoinclusions, however, in most instances should raise the suspicion of a BRAF-driven tumor, so this nuclear feature is not included among nuclear changes triaging lesions to the AUS category (Fig. 3). To summarize, nuclear atypia in the AUS category should be more prominent that what one would expect from a Bethesda II category lesion, but not sufficient to annotate the tumor as Bethesda V–VI.

In previous 2 editions of the TBSRTC, the interobserver diagnostic reproducibility of the original AUS/FLUS category was, at best, moderate [18]. With the 3rd edition, TBSRTC now separates nuclear atypia from other atypical categories in AUS, which is based on features generally recognizable in the everyday practice of cytology. It is expected that the reproducibility of the AUS category for nuclear atypia will be higher compared to other forms of atypia. This expectation finds support in prior research utilizing the Italian thyroid cytology classification system framework, demonstrating that the subdivision of the indeterminate diagnostic category III conferred increased ROM values for cases with nuclear atypia compared to architectural atypia [19].

Several non-PTC thyroid conditions with occasional nuclear atypia warranting an AUS category diagnosis are highlighted in Table 1 and illustrated in Figures 1 and 2. Notably, various benign thyroid lesions are great mimickers of PTC due to various degrees of nuclear changes, often due to reactive or reparative cellular features. Therefore, many experts advise stringent adherence to the major diagnostic features of PTC to avoid false-positive diagnosis [20]. Interestingly, some authors have also found important genotype-phenotype correlates, with an overrepresentation of THADA gene fusions in benign thyroid lesions with occasional nuclear grooves [21]. It is also equally important to note that other malignant tumors of the thyroid gland can display few but not all cytological features of PTC, such as intranuclear grooves or occasional nuclear inclusions, features that may be encountered in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and oncocytic thyroid carcinoma [22, 23].

Table 1.

Common non-PTC thyroid lesions with various types of atypia on FNAC

Histopathologic diagnosisNuclear atypia on FNACArchitectural atypia on FNACOther forms of atypia on FNAC
Graves’ disease Intranuclear grooves Microfollicles ATD-related atypia 
Hashimoto’s thyroiditis Oncocytic atypia, lymphocytic atypia, psammoma bodies 
Hyperplastic nodules/TFND Intranuclear grooves Papillary structures, microfollicles Amyloid deposits, psammoma bodies 
Nuclear pleomorphism 
Follicular thyroid tumors Crowding Papillary structures, microfollicles Mucin production, signet ring cells 
Oncocytic thyroid tumors Intranuclear grooves Microfollicles Vanishing tumors on repeat FNA, reactive spindle cells (mesenchymal origin), psammoma bodies 
Nuclear pleomorphism 
Intranuclear inclusions (rare) 
NIFTP Enlarged, crowding, intranuclear grooves, nuclear chromatin clearing Microfollicles 
Hyalinizing trabecular tumor Intranuclear grooves, pseudo-inclusions 
MTC Intranuclear grooves pseudoinclusions Amyloid deposits, rarely intracellular pigment (melanin) 
Histopathologic diagnosisNuclear atypia on FNACArchitectural atypia on FNACOther forms of atypia on FNAC
Graves’ disease Intranuclear grooves Microfollicles ATD-related atypia 
Hashimoto’s thyroiditis Oncocytic atypia, lymphocytic atypia, psammoma bodies 
Hyperplastic nodules/TFND Intranuclear grooves Papillary structures, microfollicles Amyloid deposits, psammoma bodies 
Nuclear pleomorphism 
Follicular thyroid tumors Crowding Papillary structures, microfollicles Mucin production, signet ring cells 
Oncocytic thyroid tumors Intranuclear grooves Microfollicles Vanishing tumors on repeat FNA, reactive spindle cells (mesenchymal origin), psammoma bodies 
Nuclear pleomorphism 
Intranuclear inclusions (rare) 
NIFTP Enlarged, crowding, intranuclear grooves, nuclear chromatin clearing Microfollicles 
Hyalinizing trabecular tumor Intranuclear grooves, pseudo-inclusions 
MTC Intranuclear grooves pseudoinclusions Amyloid deposits, rarely intracellular pigment (melanin) 

PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; FNAC, fine-needle aspiration cytology; ATD, antithyroid drug; TFND, thyroid follicular nodular disease; NIFTP, noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features.

Architectural Atypia

Thyroid FNA specimens classified as TBSRTC III-AUS based on architectural atypia show either microfollicles or papillary formation [24]. In cytology literature, a microfollicle is a flatter and poorly circumscribed follicular cell group, which shows nuclear crowding and overlapping. It is well documented in the literature that microfollicles are commonly encountered in both benign and malignant follicular-derived lesions of the thyroid gland. However, some have placed more emphasis even on the presence of few microfollicles as one of the atypical features. It is also prudent to know that sharply defined circumscribed collections of thyroid follicular cells termed as “spherules” can be mistaken for microfollicles, and are usually associated with benign conditions (Fig. 1) [25]. Papillary structures without readily identifiable nuclear features of PTC can be seen as focal or a prominent change in follicular nodular disease, chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis (CLT; also known as Hashimoto’s thyroiditis), Graves’ disease, oncocytic thyroid tumors, follicular adenoma with papillary architecture, and DICER1-mutated thyroid lesions, ranging from thyroid follicular nodular disease to follicular thyroid tumors (Fig. 1, 2) [1, 26‒28]. The ROM for cases with architectural atypia in most instances is quite low, but not negligible [9, 13, 14].

Other Forms of Cellular Atypia

In addition to nuclear or architectural atypia, various other cellular characteristics have been documented, which are typically uncommon in thyroid lesions and have the potential to induce diagnostic perplexity. In the following account, we list some of the cellular features, which may be responsible for classifying a thyroid FNA specimen as AUS.

Oncocytic Atypia

When assessing thyroid FNACs, caution must be exercised when diagnosing a potential oncocytic thyroid neoplasm. Oncocytic change, focal to diffuse, can be encountered in various thyroid lesions. Several nonrelated confounders exist, for example, CLT, follicular nodular disease, primary granular cell tumor, autonomous nodule, and intrathyroidal parathyroid adenoma (Fig. 2). Moreover, certain PTC subtypes and subsets of medullar thyroid carcinoma (MTC) may also exhibit oncocytic features. In CLT, the oncocytes represent metaplastic transformation of follicular epithelial cells [29], and care must be taken not to overinterpret oncocytic cell predominance of FNAC specimen as a diagnostic of either TBSRTC III or IV. This is particularly important if the specimen shows an appreciable number of lymphocytes in the background and percolating among the follicular cell groups, and thyroid function tests especially serum TSH and serologic studies showing overt hypothyroidism. It is important to note that oncocytic metaplasia is frequent in adult CLT cases but may not be so prominent in pediatric patients [29].

Clear-Cell Change

Clear-cell change can occur in primary thyroid lesions, with a reported frequency of 1–3%. This phenomenon is most encountered in FTCs but is a more infrequent occurrence in PTCs and oncocytic thyroid carcinoma. The underlying cause of the clear-cell phenotype is believed to stem from intracytoplasmic deposits of glycogen or lipids. While the histologic manifestation of clear-cell change appears to have limited prognostic significance, it poses a significant challenge in terms of differential diagnoses, as follicular thyroid tumors, PTC, MTC, metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and parathyroid tumors all may present with these rare features [30‒34].

Signet Ring Morphology

Rarely, benign and malignant thyroid tumors may show signet ring cell features [35‒38]. The clinical attributes of these lesions are not believed to be different from conventional thyroid tumors of the same type, but the bulk of information is derived from small case series, given the rarity of the diagnosis. The preoperative FNAC is often indeterminate, and most cases undergo diagnostic lobectomy [35].

Mucin-Producing Tumors

Mucinous variants of papillary and follicular thyroid carcinoma have been previously reported, and a similar phenomenon is also encountered in MTC [39‒43]. Due to their overall rarity, data are limited regarding incidence and prevalence. On the preoperative level, the lesions should not be confused with primary salivary-type tumors such as secretory carcinoma and mucoepidermoid carcinoma, as well as metastatic tumors with mucin production, such as adenocarcinoma of gastrointestinal, pulmonary, or mammary origin.

Pigmented Lesions

Hemosiderin-laden macrophages are usual findings in thyroid aspirates from adenomatous nodules arising in follicular nodular disease with cystic degeneration and usually do not warrant additional attention. Histiocytic cells can show enlarged elongated nuclei with chromatin clearing and intranuclear grooves, mimicking PTC features [44]. Rarely, atypical histiocytic cells with grooved or contorted nuclei may be noted – which should alert the cytologist of the possibility of isolated Langerhans cell histiocytosis of the thyroid [45, 46]. On postoperative analysis, CD1a and S100 immunoreactivity are noted in the Langerhans’ cells, and the lesion is often driven by a BRAF V600E mutation [45]. The presence of melanotic pigment in the thyroid (“black thyroid gland”) is closely associated with prolonged minocycline therapy but rarely may also represent melanotic MTC [47, 48]. It is crucial to exclude metastatic melanoma when faced with an aspirate showing lesional cells with intracytoplasmic pigment.

Endocrine-Type Degenerative Atypia

Pronounced endocrine-type cellular atypia is characterized by marked nuclear pleomorphism and bizarre cellular features and is observed in the subset of cases representing clinically benign conditions such as Graves’ disease treated with antithyroid drug regimen, dyshormonogenetic goiter, and normal thyroid tissue exposed to irradiation (Fig. 2) [49, 50]. In some instances, the preoperative FNAC may be overinterpreted as malignant based on these cellular features, leading to unnecessary surgical intervention. In a recent series, 4.1% of cases with endocrine-type atypia were false positive for malignancy on preoperative FNAC, thus highlighting the need for careful assessment and review of clinical features of seemingly benign lesions with pleomorphic features [50].

Other

Other forms of thyroid atypia can be encountered in thyroid gland, which are unrelated to the tumor morphology and structure, and rather reflective of stromal changes. Some of the most encountered features are listed briefly below.

Lymphocytic Atypia

Lymphocytic aggregates are common in the thyroid and may be indicative of an underlying CLT, subacute thyroiditis (de Quervain’s thyroiditis), or silent (focal) thyroiditis (Fig. 1, 2). However, lymphocytic infiltration is also commonly encountered in certain subtypes of PTC, such as the diffuse sclerosing PTC and Warthin-like PTC [51, 52]. As a rule of thumb, lesions with lymphocytic background should only be diagnosed as PTC when all major diagnostic features are present. If the cytologist cannot safely rule out lymphoma, flow cytometry has been shown to be helpful [53].

Vanishing Thyroid Tumors

A rare but acknowledged group of lesions in thyroid cytopathology are the so-called “vanishing thyroid tumors,” which are degenerated lesions induced by secondary changes associated to a previous FNAC procedure. This is more commonly encountered in cases where a small gauge needle (22–23 gauge), instead of larger gauge (25–27 gauge), has been used. In a series of 14 cases, TBSRTC V-VI (suspicious for PTC/PTC) and TBSRTC III were the two most common preoperative diagnoses; and 7 of the vanishing thyroid tumors were nondiagnostic on postoperative pathology [54]. Oncocytic thyroid tumors seem particularly overrepresented among cases that degenerate/vanish following FNAB [55, 56]. The mechanistic reason for the abolition of tumor tissue is not known. For the practicing cytopathologist, the entity may be of interest for in cases lacking tumor in the surgical pathology specimen undergoing multiple FNA procedures.

Amyloid Deposits

Amyloid deposits are usually associated with MTC and can be visualized by Congo red staining with the characteristic apple-green birefringence under polarized light. Focal amyloid depositions may also be detected in amyloid goiter – a rare but potential differential diagnosis, which should not be overlooked, especially in patients with an established amyloidosis [57‒59].

Desmoid-Like Fibromatosis

A subset of PTCs may present with an associated desmoid-like fibromatosis, a synchronous soft tissue neoplasm driven by CTNNB1 mutations [60‒62]. In some instances, the finding of atypical spindle cells on FNA may lead to diagnostic conundrums. A nuclear beta-catenin staining (preferably performed on the cell block specimen) may be indicative or diagnostic of fibromatosis in such cases.

Psammoma Bodies

As defined, psammoma bodies are small, round to flower-contoured lamellated calcium deposits that can occur in various neoplastic processes throughout the body such as PTC, serous ovarian carcinoma, meningioma, duodenal neuroendocrine tumors, and papillary renal cell carcinoma, to name a few. In thyroid cytopathology, the finding of psammoma bodies may indicate a PTC, but it is important to know that other, non-PTC lesions may occasionally can harbor psammoma bodies, such as oncocytic thyroid tumors, thyroid follicular nodular disease, and CLT [63‒65].

The selection of ancillary studies to aid triaging of thyroid lesions in the clinical setting is mostly dependent upon specific circumstances: the cytomorphological features of the specimen, and the level of clinical and radiological suspicion regarding malignancy. These adjunct assessments serve to complement the conventional cytological evaluation, playing a pivotal role in shaping thyroid nodule management. Below is a short summary of the most used auxiliary analyses in the preoperative workup of thyroid tumors.

Immunocytochemistry

Although cytomorphological assessment is the cornerstone of the TBSRTC, immunocytochemistry (ICC) may be particularly useful in cases with various forms of atypia. ICC may help to distinguish whether a lesion is a primary tumor or a metastasis to the thyroid gland, as most well-differentiated and high-grade thyroid carcinomas express the nuclear transcription factors TTF1 and PAX8. Moreover, nuclear expression of GATA3 supports a parathyroid origin. Some studies suggest that the Ki-67 proliferation labeling index could be of value cytological preparations from thyroid lesions; however, there are no established criteria for how the proliferation index will be enumerated in FNA specimens. Although malignant thyroid tumors exhibit an increase in Ki-67 compared to benign lesions, there exists a significant overlap between tumor entities [66, 67]. ICC employing antibodies targeting PTC-related markers such as CK19, HBME1, and Galectin-3 has shown some promise in cases reported as AUS, especially for cell block preparation [68, 69]. However, the specificity of these markers will require further investigations in extended series. Similarly, the mutation-specific BRAF VE1 antibody has shown encouraging results when applied to cell block material, albeit with a decrease in both sensitivity and specificity when used on conventional smears [70].

Loss of CD56 expression and overexpression of cyclin D1 on ICC are reported to show high predictability for malignant thyroid tumors on subsequent histopathology; however, the literature is limited on this topic [71‒73]. Recently, P53 was shown to serve as a valuable diagnostic marker in cytology specimens to identify indeterminate lesions that represent well-differentiated thyroid cancers on subsequent histologic preparations [74].

Single-Gene Analyses

Molecular workup of thyroid nodules is gaining ground as a reliable method in clinical routine practice, especially for cases classified as TBSRTC III and IV. In terms of preoperative assessment, the analyses can be subdivided into single-gene assays and targeted, multigene panels – each with their benefits and downsides. Some of the main hallmarks of these tests are illustrated in Figure 4.

Fig. 4.

Overview of useful genetic tests in the preoperative workup of indeterminate thyroid nodules. BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations can be assayed as single-gene tests with high positive predictive values for malignancy, while Afirma® GSC® and ThyroSeq V are two well-known multigene panels with a broader range. PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; FTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma; DHGTC, differentiated high-grade thyroid carcinoma; PDTC, poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma; ATC, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma; NIFTP, noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features. Created using BioRender.com.

Fig. 4.

Overview of useful genetic tests in the preoperative workup of indeterminate thyroid nodules. BRAF V600E and TERT promoter mutations can be assayed as single-gene tests with high positive predictive values for malignancy, while Afirma® GSC® and ThyroSeq V are two well-known multigene panels with a broader range. PTC, papillary thyroid carcinoma; FTC, follicular thyroid carcinoma; DHGTC, differentiated high-grade thyroid carcinoma; PDTC, poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma; ATC, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma; NIFTP, noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features. Created using BioRender.com.

Close modal

The most straightforward molecular analysis with a clear-cut implication for diagnosis is sequencing of the BRAF gene, more specifically codon 600. A somatic BRAF V660E mutation is the most frequent recurring event in thyroid cancer and is practically never reported in benign thyroid lesions. Specifically, BRAF V600E is reported in approximately 50–60% of PTC and is also found in the majority of high-grade thyroid carcinoma and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) derived from a PTC lineage [1]. Therefore, the finding of a BRAF V600E mutation is inevitably indicative of malignant thyroid tumor even if the overall cytomorphology is suspicious but not confirmatory of thyroid malignancy. Moreover, the finding of such a mutation would also help the cytopathologist to exclude potential differential diagnoses such as follicular neoplasm and NIFTP, as these two entities should exhibit a RAS-like genomic profile and not a BRAF mutation [1]. However, it should be noted that metastatic melanoma or adenocarcinoma of the lower gastrointestinal tract also frequently harbors activating BRAF mutations, so a combination of clinical history, imaging, and morphological assessment is key to avoid diagnostic pitfalls when interpreting molecular analyses. From a clinical perspective, the 2022 WHO classification of thyroid neoplasia and current ATA guidelines suggest that ATC should undergo BRAF mutational testing to allow for potential tailor-made treatment with BRAF inhibitors [1, 75]. Thus, BRAF sequencing is recommended for all tertiary thyroid cancer centers. BRAF hot spot mutational testing is included in almost all modern next-generation sequencing platforms that interrogate clinically impactful cancer-associated genes, but cheaper, rapid assays that uniquely target this gene are also available. As BRAF mutations are clonal in thyroid cancer, multiregional sampling to ensure detection is not required [76, 77]. Many pathology laboratories also incorporate a mutation-specific BRAF antibody in the workup of thyroid tumors, although the validation of this analysis is heavily focused on the postoperative, formalin-fixated paraffin-embedded material rather than on the FNAC specimen [78].

Other single-gene aberrations with potential clinical implications are TERT promoter (TERTp) mutations, which are noncoding alterations associated with malignant thyroid tumors exhibiting a particularly poor patient outcome [79‒81]. The TERT gene encodes the catalytic subunit of the telomerase complex, responsible for maintaining telomere length and allowing immortalization [82]. Two recurrent mutations (denoted “C228T” and “C250T”) have been shown to enhance the binding of various transcription factors to the TERT promoter, in turn leading to increased TERT gene transcription. TERTp mutations are observed in small subsets of PTC and FTC with dismal prognosis and are frequently reported in high-grade thyroid carcinomas (differentiated high-grade thyroid carcinoma and poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma) as well as ATC [1]. On the other hand, TERTp mutations are almost never found in benign thyroid lesions, thus providing the pathologist with a marker exhibiting excellent specificity [83]. In some institutions, TERTp mutations are routinely assayed as a postoperative analysis in rare, low-risk entities such as follicular thyroid tumor of uncertain malignant potential, given that mutation-positive samples have a real risk of future recurrences [84]. Therefore, it is not surprising to find that studies with TERTp mutational testing using digital droplet PCR performed on thyroid FNAC material have shown to exhibit excellent specificity, but a poor sensitivity [85, 86]. As the positive predictive value of a mutation is very high, the finding of such an alteration in a thyroid aspirate would strongly indicate a malignant tumor. For small subsets of cases diagnosed as AUS, the molecular analysis could help to triage certain cases to surgical excision in favor of re-biopsy or surveillance. Other single-gene markers of potential value when triaging cases with indeterminate cytology include TSH receptor gene mutations, which are almost always associated with benign disease [87].

Multigene Classifiers

Several multigene classifiers are available to increase the sensitivity of thyroid FNAC analyses, including Veracyte Afirma® Gene Expression Classifier (GEC), Afirma® Genetic Sequence Classifier (GSC), ThyroSeqV (Sonic Healthcare USA), RosettaGX® Reveal, and ThyraMIR®. While ThyroSeqV combines gene mutation and fusion signatures with the expression of various messenger RNAs (mRNAs), the other panels are focused on mutations, mRNA expression, or microRNA expressional patterns. Most of these genomic classifiers are primarily targeting lesions with an indeterminate cytology, meaning Bethesda categories III–V.

The Afirma®® GEC is developed by Veracyte Inc. and assesses 167 genes in terms of mRNA expression levels and categorizes nodules as benign, suspicious, or nondiagnostic. Recent research highlights the potential of GEC analysis in managing indeterminate cytology results with high negative predictive values, potentially reducing unnecessary surgeries by nearly 50%, particularly in the Bethesda III–IV categories [88, 89]. Building on these initial findings, the subsequently developed Afirma® GSC includes the expression of roughly 10,000 genes, with a focus on 1,115 core genes and several auxiliary components to detect parathyroid origin, MTC, BRAF V600E mutations, and RET::PTC1 and RET::PTC3 fusions, as well as the presence of oncocytic cells and oncocytic neoplasms. The GSC has proven more specific and sensitive in terms of diagnostic performance than the GEC predecessor when assessing cytologically indeterminate thyroid lesions [90, 91].

ThyroSeqV examines various genetic mutations rearrangements and gene expression with high sensitivity and specificity, achieving a high diagnostic accuracy in indeterminate nodules [92]. The algorithm exhibits an exceptionally high negative predictive value but, just like its Afirma®® counterpart, shows a limited positive predictive value for indeterminate cytology [93]. In recent years, ThyroSeq® has shown efficient in triaging NIFTP from infiltrative and encapsulated follicular variants of PTC, making the test of potential clinical use in high-volume centers [94].

Interestingly, studies have explored a more targeted molecular approach, exemplified by the 7-gene classifier developed by an Italian consortium [95]. The 7-gene panel test, which concentrates on key genetic events in thyroid cancer, demonstrated improved preoperative risk stratification of indeterminate nodules. This implies that employing a more focused approach with fewer genetic markers could be a valid strategy in triaging thyroid nodules for subsequent clinical management, while other groups have reported limited success in triaging indeterminate cases using a restricted set of genes [96].

Finally, in the context of genetic testing, it is crucial to emphasize that access to ancillary molecular techniques varies among different institutions globally. The reasons for this discrepancy may be rooted in the cost of the analyses, as implementing and maintaining the methodology can be expensive. Additionally, multigene classifier tests often require national regulatory approval and validation before clinical use, with regulatory processes and requirements varying across countries. Finally, disparities in national guidelines may also influence the adoption of molecular tests into practices; pathology centers may be less motivated to incorporate these tests in regions where they are not widely endorsed. Hence, numerous centers currently depend solely on cytological evaluation, and most national guidelines lack recommendations regarding the molecular workup of thyroid nodules.

It is well established that each thyroid FNA case demands a personalized rather than a generalized approach. Thus, offering precise guidelines for cases exhibiting any form of atypia, nuclear, architectural, or otherwise, can be challenging. Nevertheless, there exists a roadmap that can greatly benefit cytologists when evaluating a thyroid case in the clinical setting.

AUS cases represent a diverse spectrum of benign and malignant thyroid lesions displaying varying forms and extent of atypia. The clinical management may include clinical follow-up, repeat FNA (with or without ancillary studies), or perform a diagnostic lobectomy. In these instances, the value of repeat FNA should not be overlooked in case the initial assessment was indeterminate. It has been shown that cases classified as TBSRTC III or IV that are classified as benign on repeat FNA exhibit an exceedingly minimal risk for NIFTP and/or malignancy, thus casting doubt upon the utility of molecular testing in this specific cohort [97]. Moreover, multigene molecular testing in cases diagnosed as TBSRTC III on repeat FNA increases the positive predictive value of the test by reducing the number of benign cases referred to surgery [98]. Interestingly, oncocytic thyroid neoplasms may be hard to predict even by molecular testing due to their profile being different other follicular derived neoplasms [1, 98].

While most indeterminate thyroid lesions may be subjected to repeat fine needle aspiration or molecular testing, one must also acknowledge the presence of other clinical methods to valuable in the risk stratification of thyroid nodules, such as integration of histologic, clinical, and ultrasonographic features. It is also important to contemplate the utilization of a core-needle biopsy in specific cases characterized by the insufficient material in cytology or instances that are notably fibrotic and challenging to aspirate. This is particularly pertinent if the clinical presentation raises concerns about malignancy. For instance, the diagnosis of ATC may benefit from a core-needle biopsy, as the increased tissue volume allows for assessments that may not always be feasible on the FNAC material. These assessments may include immunohistochemistry to rule out rare differential diagnoses and contribute to potentially therapeutic evaluations (e.g., BRAF VE1, PD-L1). Furthermore, “rapid on-site evaluation” (ROSE) in thyroid cytology offers immediate feedback to the cytopathologist during the FNAB procedure. This enables the assessment of specimen adequacy and helps identify the potential need for additional passes to obtain a representative sample. Consequently, ROSE contributes to a reduction in the likelihood of inconclusive or nondiagnostic results. Therefore, ROSE enhances the overall diagnostic accuracy of thyroid cytology and minimizes the necessity for repeat FNA procedures [99, 100]. Moreover, from an imaging perspective, the TIRADS algorithm may prove to be particularly helpful, as pairing a structured ultrasonographic examination with the Bethesda system substantially improves preoperative risk assessment of thyroid nodules [101, 102].

Overall, in comprehensive patient management, it is essential to evaluate the FNAC results, associated imaging, related clinical features, and ancillary tests, including molecular workup, to thoroughly assess the significance of atypia. Therefore, the importance of discussing challenging patient cases in a multidisciplinary tumor board meeting cannot be underestimated. An approach to atypia in thyroid FNAC is illustrated in Figure 5.

Fig. 5.

Schematic representation of clinical triaging of patients with a preoperative Bethesda III category lesion. Thyroid FNA analyses with atypical features stratified into nuclear, architectural, or “other” are associated with various ROM. Preferred clinical workup is highlighted in bold text. Integration of other clinical parameters is imperative for all TBSRTC III lesions. Created using BioRender.com.

Fig. 5.

Schematic representation of clinical triaging of patients with a preoperative Bethesda III category lesion. Thyroid FNA analyses with atypical features stratified into nuclear, architectural, or “other” are associated with various ROM. Preferred clinical workup is highlighted in bold text. Integration of other clinical parameters is imperative for all TBSRTC III lesions. Created using BioRender.com.

Close modal

Employing the lexicon of TBSRTC, cytopathologists find themselves equipped with a powerful means of conveying thyroid FNA interpretations to referring physicians. This terminology has facilitated communication in a concise, unequivocal, and clinically relevant manner, ultimately enhancing the efficacy of thyroid nodule management. However, there are still several gaps to be filled, most notably in the realm of cytologically indeterminate lesions. It is important to recognize the value of an integrated approach when triaging AUS lesions, considering various clinical, morphological, and sometimes also immunocytochemical or molecular features. Future intensified molecular research regarding the molecular underpinnings of thyroid tumors holds the potential to unveil even more refined and high-resolution risk profiles, possibly enabling translation into trimmed-down, clinically useful single-gene or ICC panels. This has the potential to offer precise preoperative stratification of AUS lesions as part of routine clinical practice, even in cytology centers without access to expensive multigene panels.

Drs. Christofer Juhlin and Zubair Baloch have no relevant interests to disclose that can potential influence the content of this submission.

There are no funding sources for this submission.

Both Drs. Christofer Juhlin and Zubair Baloch contributed equally to the framework and drafting this invited manuscript, tables, and figures. The final submission is approved by both authors.

1.
Baloch
ZW
,
Asa
SL
,
Barletta
JA
,
Ghossein
RA
,
Juhlin
CC
,
Jung
CK
et al
.
Overview of the 2022 WHO classification of thyroid neoplasms
.
Endocr Pathol
.
2022
;
33
(
1
):
27
63
.
2.
Juhlin
CC
,
Mete
O
,
Baloch
ZW
.
The 2022 WHO classification of thyroid tumors: novel concepts in nomenclature and grading
.
Endocr Relat Cancer
.
2023
;
30
(
2
):
e220293
.
3.
Ali
SZ
,
VanderLaan
PA
The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology: definitions, criteria, and explanatory notes
3rd ed
Cham
Springer
.
2023
.
4.
Kwak
JY
,
Han
KH
,
Yoon
JH
,
Moon
HJ
,
Son
EJ
,
Park
SH
et al
.
Thyroid imaging reporting and data system for US features of nodules: a step in establishing better stratification of cancer risk
.
Radiology
.
2011
;
260
(
3
):
892
9
.
5.
Walters
BK
,
Garrett
SL
,
Aden
JK
,
Williams
GM
,
Butler-Garcia
SL
,
Newberry
TR
et al
.
Diagnostic lobectomy for bethesda III thyroid nodules: pathological outcomes and risk factors for malignancy
.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol
.
2021
;
130
(
9
):
1064
8
.
6.
Özkara
SK
,
Bayrak
BY
,
Turan
G
.
High risk of malignancy in cases with atypia of undetermined significance on fine needle aspiration of thyroid nodules even after exclusion of NIFTP
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2020
;
48
(
11
):
986
97
.
7.
Rossi
ED
,
Adeniran
AJ
,
Faquin
WC
.
Pitfalls in thyroid cytopathology
.
Surg Pathol Clin
.
2019
;
12
(
4
):
865
81
.
8.
Poller
DN
,
Cochand-Priollet
B
,
Trimboli
P
.
Thyroid FNA terminology: the case for a single unified international system for thyroid FNA reporting
.
Cytopathology
.
2021
;
32
(
6
):
714
7
.
9.
Glass
RE
,
Levy
JJ
,
Motanagh
SA
,
Vaickus
LJ
,
Liu
X
.
Atypia of undetermined significance in thyroid cytology: nuclear atypia and architectural atypia are associated with different molecular alterations and risks of malignancy
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2021
;
129
(
12
):
966
72
.
10.
Kim
SJ
,
Roh
J
,
Baek
JH
,
Hong
SJ
,
Shong
YK
,
Kim
WB
et al
.
Risk of malignancy according to sub-classification of the atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS) category in the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology
.
Cytopathology
.
2017
;
28
(
1
):
65
73
.
11.
VanderLaan
PA
,
Marqusee
E
,
Krane
JF
.
Usefulness of diagnostic qualifiers for thyroid fine-needle aspirations with atypia of undetermined significance
.
Am J Clin Pathol
.
2011
;
136
(
4
):
572
7
.
12.
Gan
TRX
,
Nga
ME
,
Lum
JHY
,
Wong
WM
,
Tan
WB
,
Parameswaran
R
et al
.
Thyroid cytology-nuclear versus architectural atypia within the “Atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance” Bethesda category have significantly different rates of malignancy
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2017
;
125
(
4
):
245
56
.
13.
Gajzer
DC
,
Tjendra
Y
,
Kerr
DA
,
Algashaamy
K
,
Zuo
Y
,
Menendez
SG
et al
.
Probability of malignancy as determined by ThyroSeq v3 genomic classifier varies according to the subtype of atypia
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2022
;
130
(
11
):
881
90
.
14.
Babajani
A
,
Rahmani
S
,
Raoufi
M
,
Eidgahi
ES
,
Dastjerdi
AV
,
Behfarnia
P
et al
.
Clinico-cytopathological subcategorization in thyroid nodules of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance using the TIRADS and Bethesda classifications
.
Front Endocrinol
.
2023
;
14
:
1135196
.
15.
Cherella
CE
,
Hollowell
ML
,
Smith
JR
,
Zendejas
B
,
Modi
BP
,
Cibas
ES
et al
.
Subtype of atypia on cytology and risk of malignancy in pediatric thyroid nodules
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2022
;
130
(
5
):
330
5
.
16.
Bellevicine
C
,
Sgariglia
R
,
Migliatico
I
,
Vigliar
E
,
D’Anna
M
,
Nacchio
MA
et al
.
Different qualifiers of AUS/FLUS thyroid FNA have distinct BRAF, RAS, RET/PTC, and PAX8/PPARg alterations
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2018
;
126
(
5
):
317
25
.
17.
Tondi Resta
I
,
Gubbiotti
MA
,
Montone
KT
,
Livolsi
VA
,
Baloch
ZW
.
An investigation into noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features: does the initial proposal on noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasms with papillary-like nuclear features behavior hold true
.
Hum Pathol
.
2023
S0046-8177
23
00168
5
.
18.
Padmanabhan
V
,
Marshall
CB
,
Akdas Barkan
G
,
Ghofrani
M
,
Laser
A
,
Tolgay Ocal
I
et al
.
Reproducibility of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance category using the bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytology when reviewing slides from different institutions: a study of interobserver variability among cytopathologists
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2017
;
45
(
5
):
399
405
.
19.
Massa
F
,
Caraci
P
,
Sapino
A
,
De Rosa
G
,
Volante
M
,
Papotti
M
.
Outcome and diagnostic reproducibility of the thyroid cytology “indeterminate categories” SIAPEC/SIE 2014 in a consecutive series of 302 cases
.
J Endocrinol Invest
.
2021
;
44
(
4
):
803
9
.
20.
Anderson
SR
,
Mandel
S
,
LiVolsi
VA
,
Gupta
PK
,
Baloch
ZW
.
Can cytomorphology differentiate between benign nodules and tumors arising in Graves’ disease
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2004
;
31
(
1
):
64
7
.
21.
Roberts
JW
,
Lubin
DJ
,
Shi
Q
,
Viswanathan
K
.
Cytomorphologic features of thyroid nodules harboring thyroid adenoma-associated fusion: a single institutional review of 11 cases
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2022
;
50
(
7
):
327
34
.
22.
Schäffer
R
,
Müller
HA
,
Pfeifer
U
,
Ormanns
W
.
Cytological findings in medullary carcinoma of the thyroid
.
Pathol Res Pract
.
1984
;
178
(
5
):
461
6
.
23.
Blumenfeld
W
,
Nair
R
,
Mir
R
.
Diagnostic significance of papillary structures and intranuclear inclusions in Hurthle-cell neoplasms of the thyroid
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
1999
;
20
(
4
):
185
9
.
24.
Kim
TH
,
Krane
JF
.
The evolution of “atypia” in thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2022
;
50
(
4
):
146
53
.
25.
Costigan
DC
,
Shaar
M
,
Frates
MC
,
Alexander
EK
,
Barletta
JA
,
Cibas
ES
.
Defining thyroid spherules: a benign cytomorphologic feature that mimics microfollicles
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2020
;
128
(
3
):
171
6
.
26.
Khayyata
S
,
Barroeta
JE
,
LiVolsi
VA
,
Baloch
ZW
.
Papillary hyperplastic nodule: pitfall in the cytopathologic diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma
.
Endocr Pract
.
2008
;
14
(
7
):
863
8
.
27.
Juhlin
CC
.
On the chopping block: overview of DICER1 mutations in endocrine and neuroendocrine neoplasms
.
Surg Pathol Clin
.
2023
;
16
(
1
):
107
18
.
28.
Juhlin
CC
,
Stenman
A
,
Zedenius
J
.
Macrofollicular variant follicular thyroid tumors are DICER1 mutated and exhibit distinct histological features
.
Histopathology
.
2021
;
79
(
4
):
661
6
.
29.
Das
DK
.
Hürthle cell metaplasia in chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis: role of age factor and review of literature on its molecular pathogenesis
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2019
;
47
(
5
):
475
81
.
30.
Cipriani
NA
,
Agarwal
S
,
Dias-Santagata
D
,
Faquin
WC
,
Sadow
PM
.
Clear cell change in thyroid carcinoma: a clinicopathologic and molecular study with identification of variable genetic anomalies
.
Thyroid
.
2017
;
27
(
6
):
819
24
.
31.
Carcangiu
ML
,
Sibley
RK
,
Rosai
J
.
Clear cell change in primary thyroid tumors. A study of 38 cases
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
1985
;
9
(
10
):
705
22
.
32.
Juhlin
CC
,
Bränström
R
,
Shabo
I
,
Höög
A
.
Clear cell variant of a follicular thyroid tumor with uncertain malignant potential: a case report
.
Int J Surg Pathol
.
2018
;
27
(
3
):
290
3
.
33.
Juhlin
CC
,
Nilsson
IL
,
Falhammar
H
,
Zedenius
J
.
Institutional characterisation of water clear cell parathyroid adenoma: a rare entity often unrecognised by TC-99m-sestamibi scintigraphy
.
Pathology
.
2021
;
53
(
7
):
852
9
.
34.
Cipriani
NA
,
Kakkar
A
.
Top 10 clear cell head and neck lesions to contemplate
.
Head Neck Pathol
.
2023
;
17
(
1
):
33
52
.
35.
Farhat
NA
,
Onenerk
AM
,
Krane
JF
,
Dias-Santagata
D
,
Sadow
PM
,
Faquin
WC
.
Primary benign and malignant thyroid neoplasms with signet ring cells: cytologic, histologic, and molecular features
.
Am J Clin Pathol
.
2017
;
148
(
3
):
251
8
.
36.
Hysek
M
,
Jatta
K
,
Stenman
A
,
Darai-Ramqvist
E
,
Zedenius
J
,
Höög
A
et al
.
Signet ring cell variant of follicular thyroid carcinoma: report of two cases with focus on morphological, expressional and genetic characteristics
.
Diagn Pathol
.
2019
;
14
(
1
):
127
.
37.
Schröder
S
,
Böcker
W
.
Signet-ring-cell thyroid tumors. Follicle cell tumors with arrest of folliculogenesis
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
1985
;
9
(
9
):
619
29
.
38.
Romero-Rojas
AE
,
Diaz-Perez
JA
,
Mastrodimos
M
,
Chinchilla
SI
.
Follicular thyroid carcinoma with signet ring cell morphology: fine-needle aspiration cytology, histopathology, and immunohistochemistry
.
Endocr Pathol
.
2013
;
24
(
4
):
239
45
.
39.
Diaz-Perez
R
,
Quiroz
H
,
Nishiyama
RH
.
Primary mucinous adenocarcinoma of thyroid gland
.
Cancer
.
1976
;
38
(
3
):
1323
5
.
40.
Mardi
K
.
Cytodiagnosis of mucin-producing medullary carcinoma of the thyroid gland
.
South Asian J Cancer
.
2013
;
2
(
4
):
210
.
41.
Squillaci
S
,
Pitino
A
,
Spairani
C
,
Ferrari
M
,
Carlon
E
,
Cosimi
MF
.
Mucinous variant of follicular carcinoma of the thyroid gland: case report and review of the literature
.
Int J Surg Pathol
.
2016
;
24
(
2
):
170
6
.
42.
Yang
GCH
,
Scognamiglio
T
,
Kuhel
WI
.
Fine-needle aspiration of mucin-producing thyroid tumors
.
Acta Cytol
.
2011
;
55
(
6
):
549
55
.
43.
Wang
J
,
Guli
QR
,
Ming
XC
,
Zhou
HT
,
Cui
YJ
,
Jiang
YF
et al
.
Primary mucinous carcinoma of thyroid gland with prominent signet-ring-cell differentiation: a case report and review of the literature
.
OncoTargets Ther
.
2018
;
11
:
1521
8
.
44.
Nassar
A
,
Gupta
P
,
LiVolsi
VA
,
Baloch
Z
.
Histiocytic aggregates in benign nodular goiters mimicking cytologic features of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC)
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2003
;
29
(
5
):
243
5
.
45.
Saiz
E
,
Bakotic
BW
.
Isolated Langerhans cell histiocytosis of the thyroid: a report of two cases with nuclear imaging-pathologic correlation
.
Ann Diagn Pathol
.
2000
;
4
(
1
):
23
8
.
46.
Zhu
H
,
Hu
D
.
Langerhans cell histiocytosis of the thyroid diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytology. A case report
.
Acta Cytol
.
2004
;
48
(
2
):
278
80
.
47.
Sande
CM
,
Tondi Resta
I
,
Livolsi
VA
.
The thyroid pathologist meets therapeutic pharmacology
.
Endocr Pathol
.
2023
;
34
(
1
):
48
56
.
48.
Subramanian
P
,
Deshmukh
A
,
Kante
K
,
Patil
A
,
Pai
T
,
Kaur
R
et al
.
HRAS-mutated primary thyroid malignant melanoma or medullary thyroid carcinoma with melanocytic dedifferentiation? A singular case with an ontogeny-phylogeny quandary
.
Virchows Arch
.
2023
;
483
(
3
):
421
9
.
49.
Jayaram
G
,
Singh
B
,
Marwaha
RK
.
Grave’s disease. Appearance in cytologic smears from fine needle aspirates of the thyroid gland
.
Acta Cytol
.
1989
;
33
(
1
):
36
40
.
50.
Lam
H
,
Saoud
C
,
Shi
Q
,
Wong
KS
,
Cibas
ES
,
Rooper
LM
et al
.
Degenerative atypia in benign thyroid nodules: a potential diagnostic pitfall on fine-needle aspiration
.
J Am Soc Cytopathol
.
2023
;
12
(
5
):
341
50
.
51.
Takagi
N
,
Hirokawa
M
,
Nobuoka
Y
,
Higuchi
M
,
Kuma
S
,
Miyauchi
A
.
Diffuse sclerosing variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: a study of fine needle aspiration cytology in 20 patients
.
Cytopathology
.
2014
;
25
(
3
):
199
204
.
52.
Vallonthaiel
AG
,
Agarwal
S
,
Jain
D
,
Yadav
R
,
Damle
NA
.
Cytological features of warthin-like papillary thyroid carcinoma: a case report with review of previous cytology cases
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2017
;
45
(
9
):
837
41
.
53.
Karabachev
AD
,
Brundage
WJ
,
Sajisevi
MB
,
Ciolino
AL
.
Feasibility of fine needle aspiration for diagnosis of b-cell lymphoma of the thyroid: a case series and review of the literature
.
Diagn Pathol
.
2023
;
18
(
1
):
69
.
54.
Eze
OP
,
Cai
G
,
Baloch
ZW
,
Khan
A
,
Virk
R
,
Hammers
LW
et al
.
Vanishing thyroid tumors: a diagnostic dilemma after ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration
.
Thyroid
.
2013
;
23
(
2
):
194
200
.
55.
Kholová
I
.
Vanishing thyroid gland tumors: infarction as consequence of FNA
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2016
;
44
(
7
):
568
73
.
56.
Kini
SR
.
Post-fine-needle biopsy infarction of thyroid neoplasms: a review of 28 cases
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
1996
;
15
(
3
):
211
20
.
57.
Altiparmak
MR
,
Pamuk
ON
,
Pamuk
GE
,
Apaydin
S
,
Ataman
R
,
Serdengeçti
K
.
Amyloid goitre in familial Mediterranean fever: report on three patients and review of the literature
.
Clin Rheumatol
.
2002
;
21
(
6
):
497
500
.
58.
Amado
JA
,
Ondiviela
R
,
Palacios
S
,
Casanova
D
,
Manzanos
J
,
Freijanes
J
.
Fast growing goitre as the first clinical manifestation of systemic amyloidosis
.
Postgrad Med J
.
1982
;
58
(
677
):
171
2
.
59.
Juhlin
CC
,
Karlsson
F
,
Bränström
R
.
A rare case of giant amyloid goiter: a case report and review of literature
.
Med Case Rep
.
2019
;
5
(
2
):
100
.
60.
Huang
H
,
Li
L
,
Liu
X
,
Zhao
L
,
Cui
Z
,
Zhang
R
et al
.
Papillary thyroid carcinoma with desmoid-type fibromatosis: the clinicopathological features with characteristic imaging and molecular correlation requiring comprehensive treatment
.
Hum Pathol
.
2023
;
136
:
84
95
.
61.
Juhlin
CC
,
Hysek
M
,
Stenman
A
,
Zedenius
J
.
Papillary thyroid carcinoma with desmoid-like fibromatosis: double trouble
.
Endocr Pathol
.
2022
;
33
(
4
):
525
7
.
62.
Rebecchini
C
,
Nobile
A
,
Piana
S
,
Sarro
R
,
Bisig
B
,
Gerasimos
SP
et al
.
Papillary thyroid carcinoma with nodular fasciitis-like stroma and β-catenin mutations should be renamed papillary thyroid carcinoma with desmoid-type fibromatosis
.
Mod Pathol
.
2017
;
30
(
2
):
236
45
.
63.
Fiorella
RM
,
Isley
W
,
Miller
LK
,
Kragel
PJ
.
Multinodular goiter of the thyroid mimicking malignancy: diagnostic pitfalls in fine-needle aspiration biopsy
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
1993
;
9
(
3
):
351
5
; discussion 355-357
64.
Dugan
JM
,
Atkinson
BF
,
Avitabile
A
,
Schimmel
M
,
LiVolsi
VA
.
Psammoma bodies in fine needle aspirate of the thyroid in lymphocytic thyroiditis
.
Acta Cytol
.
1987
;
31
(
3
):
330
4
.
65.
Ronen
N
,
Suster
D
.
Psammomatous calcifications in thyroid oncocytic (Hürthle cell) follicular tumors
.
Ann Diagn Pathol
.
2023
;
62
:
152061
.
66.
Mu
N
,
Juhlin
CC
,
Tani
E
,
Sofiadis
A
,
Reihnér
E
,
Zedenius
J
et al
.
High Ki-67 index in fine needle aspiration cytology of follicular thyroid tumors is associated with increased risk of carcinoma
.
Endocrine
.
2018
;
61
(
2
):
293
302
.
67.
Hellgren
LS
,
Stenman
A
,
Paulsson
JO
,
Höög
A
,
Larsson
C
,
Zedenius
J
et al
.
Prognostic utility of the ki-67 labeling index in follicular thyroid tumors: a 20-year experience from a tertiary thyroid center
.
Endocr Pathol
.
2022
;
33
(
2
):
231
42
.
68.
Cochand-Priollet
B
,
Dahan
H
,
Laloi-Michelin
M
,
Polivka
M
,
Saada
M
,
Herman
P
et al
.
Immunocytochemistry with cytokeratin 19 and anti-human mesothelial cell antibody (HBME1) increases the diagnostic accuracy of thyroid fine-needle aspirations: preliminary report of 150 liquid-based fine-needle aspirations with histological control
.
Thyroid
.
2011
;
21
(
10
):
1067
73
.
69.
Abram
M
,
Huhtamella
R
,
Kalfert
D
,
Hakso-Mäkinen
H
,
Ludvíková
M
,
Kholová
I
.
The role of cell blocks and immunohistochemistry in thyroid atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance bethesda category
.
Acta Cytol
.
2021
;
65
(
3
):
257
63
.
70.
Smith
AL
,
Williams
MD
,
Stewart
J
,
Wang
WL
,
Krishnamurthy
S
,
Cabanillas
ME
et al
.
Utility of the BRAF p.V600E immunoperoxidase stain in FNA direct smears and cell block preparations from patients with thyroid carcinoma
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2018
;
126
(
6
):
406
13
.
71.
Teshima
M
,
Tokita
K
,
Ryo
E
,
Matsumoto
F
,
Kondo
M
,
Ikegami
Y
et al
.
Clinical impact of a cytological screening system using cyclin D1 immunostaining and genomic analysis for the diagnosis of thyroid nodules
.
BMC Cancer
.
2019
;
19
(
1
):
245
.
72.
Solmaz
OA
.
Diagnostic importance of CD56 with fine-needle aspiration cytology in suspected papillary thyroid carcinoma cases
.
CytoJournal
.
2018
;
15
:
3
.
73.
Cha
H
,
Pyo
JY
,
Hong
SW
.
The usefulness of immunocytochemistry of CD56 in determining malignancy from indeterminate thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology
.
J Pathol Transl Med
.
2018
;
52
(
6
):
404
10
.
74.
Policardo
F
,
Tralongo
P
,
Arciuolo
D
,
Fiorentino
V
,
Cardasciani
L
,
Pierconti
F
et al
.
p53 expression in cytology samples may represent a marker of early-stage cancer
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2023
;
131
(
6
):
392
401
.
75.
Silver Karcioglu
A
,
Iwata
AJ
,
Pusztaszeri
M
,
Abdelhamid Ahmed
AH
,
Randolph
GW
.
The American Thyroid Association (ATA) integrates molecular testing into its framework for managing patients with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC): update on the 2021 ATA ATC guidelines
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2022
;
130
(
3
):
174
80
.
76.
Wang
W
,
Wang
H
,
Teng
X
,
Wang
H
,
Mao
C
,
Teng
R
et al
.
Clonal analysis of bilateral, recurrent, and metastatic papillary thyroid carcinomas
.
Hum Pathol
.
2010
;
41
(
9
):
1299
309
.
77.
Dong
W
,
Nicolson
NG
,
Choi
J
,
Barbieri
AL
,
Kunstman
JW
,
Abou Azar
S
et al
.
Clonal evolution analysis of paired anaplastic and well-differentiated thyroid carcinomas reveals shared common ancestor
.
Genes Chromosomes Cancer
.
2018
;
57
(
12
):
645
52
.
78.
Capper
D
,
Preusser
M
,
Habel
A
,
Sahm
F
,
Ackermann
U
,
Schindler
G
et al
.
Assessment of BRAF V600E mutation status by immunohistochemistry with a mutation-specific monoclonal antibody
.
Acta Neuropathol
.
2011
;
122
(
1
):
11
9
.
79.
Bournaud
C
,
Descotes
F
,
Decaussin-Petrucci
M
,
Berthiller
J
,
de la Fouchardière
C
,
Giraudet
AL
et al
.
TERT promoter mutations identify a high-risk group in metastasis-free advanced thyroid carcinoma
.
Eur J Cancer
.
2019
;
108
:
41
9
.
80.
Landa
I
,
Ganly
I
,
Chan
TA
,
Mitsutake
N
,
Matsuse
M
,
Ibrahimpasic
T
et al
.
Frequent somatic TERT promoter mutations in thyroid cancer: higher prevalence in advanced forms of the disease
.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab
.
2013
98
9
E1562
6
.
81.
Liu
X
,
Bishop
J
,
Shan
Y
,
Pai
S
,
Liu
D
,
Murugan
AK
et al
.
Highly prevalent TERT promoter mutations in aggressive thyroid cancers
.
Endocr Relat Cancer
.
2013
;
20
(
4
):
603
10
.
82.
Juhlin
CC
.
A clinical overview of telomerase-associated aberrancies in follicular thyroid tumors as diagnostic and prognostic markers: tert alert
.
Scand J Surg
.
2020
;
109
(
3
):
187
92
.
83.
Wang
N
,
Liu
T
,
Sofiadis
A
,
Juhlin
CC
,
Zedenius
J
,
Höög
A
et al
.
TERT promoter mutation as an early genetic event activating telomerase in follicular thyroid adenoma (FTA) and atypical FTA
.
Cancer
.
2014
;
120
(
19
):
2965
79
.
84.
Hysek
M
,
Paulsson
JO
,
Jatta
K
,
Shabo
I
,
Stenman
A
,
Höög
A
et al
.
Clinical routine TERT promoter mutational screening of follicular thyroid tumors of uncertain malignant potential (FT-UMPs): a useful predictor of metastatic disease
.
Cancers
.
2019
;
11
(
10
):
1443
.
85.
Hysek
M
,
Hellgren
LS
,
Stenman
A
,
Darai-Ramqvist
E
,
Ljung
E
,
Schliemann
I
et al
.
Digital droplet PCR TERT promoter mutational screening in fine needle aspiration cytology of thyroid lesions: a highly specific technique for pre-operative identification of high-risk cases
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2023
;
51
(
6
):
331
40
.
86.
Rosvall
BR
,
Kostiuk
M
,
Williams
J
,
Matkin
A
,
Harris
J
,
Seikaly
H
et al
.
Utility of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction for TERT and BRAF mutational profiling of thyroid nodules
.
BMC Cancer
.
2021
;
21
(
1
):
1142
.
87.
Andrianus
S
,
Gubbiotti
MA
,
Mandel
SJ
,
Nikiforov
YE
,
Baloch
Z
.
Unraveling the significance of TSHR mutations in indeterminate thyroid cytology specimens
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2023
;
51
(
7
):
406
13
.
88.
Baca
SC
,
Wong
KS
,
Strickland
KC
,
Heller
HT
,
Kim
MI
,
Barletta
JA
et al
.
Qualifiers of atypia in the cytologic diagnosis of thyroid nodules are associated with different Afirma gene expression classifier results and clinical outcomes
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2017
;
125
(
5
):
313
22
.
89.
Vora
A
,
Holt
S
,
Haque
W
,
Lingvay
I
.
Long-term outcomes of thyroid nodule AFIRMA GEC testing and literature review: an institutional experience
.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
.
2020
;
162
(
5
):
634
40
.
90.
Zhang
L
,
Smola
B
,
Lew
M
,
Pang
J
,
Cantley
R
,
Pantanowitz
L
et al
.
Performance of Afirma genomic sequencing classifier vs gene expression classifier in Bethesda category III thyroid nodules: an institutional experience
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2021
;
49
(
8
):
921
7
.
91.
Vuong
HG
,
Nguyen
TPX
,
Hassell
LA
,
Jung
CK
.
Diagnostic performances of the afirma gene sequencing classifier in comparison with the gene expression classifier: a meta-analysis
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2021
;
129
(
3
):
182
9
.
92.
Nikiforov
YE
,
Carty
SE
,
Chiosea
SI
,
Coyne
C
,
Duvvuri
U
,
Ferris
RL
et al
.
Impact of the multi-gene ThyroSeq next-generation sequencing assay on cancer diagnosis in thyroid nodules with atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance cytology
.
Thyroid
.
2015
;
25
(
11
):
1217
23
.
93.
Marcadis
AR
,
Valderrabano
P
,
Ho
AS
,
Tepe
J
,
Swartzwelder
CE
,
Byrd
S
et al
.
Interinstitutional variation in predictive value of the ThyroSeq v2 genomic classifier for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules
.
Surgery
.
2019
;
165
(
1
):
17
24
.
94.
Brandler
TC
,
Zhou
F
,
Liu
CZ
,
Serrano
A
,
Sun
W
,
Nikiforov
YE
et al
.
Molecular profiles of noninvasive, minimally invasive, and invasive follicular patterned thyroid neoplasms with papillary nuclear features
.
Thyroid
.
2023
;
33
(
6
):
715
23
.
95.
Bellevicine
C
,
Migliatico
I
,
Sgariglia
R
,
Nacchio
M
,
Vigliar
E
,
Pisapia
P
et al
.
Evaluation of BRAF, RAS, RET/PTC, and PAX8/PPARg alterations in different Bethesda diagnostic categories: a multicentric prospective study on the validity of the 7-gene panel test in 1172 thyroid FNAs deriving from different hospitals in South Italy
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2020
;
128
(
2
):
107
18
.
96.
Eszlinger
M
,
Böhme
K
,
Ullmann
M
,
Görke
F
,
Siebolts
U
,
Neumann
A
et al
.
Evaluation of a two-year routine application of molecular testing of thyroid fine-needle aspirations using a seven-gene panel in a primary referral setting in Germany
.
Thyroid
.
2017
;
27
(
3
):
402
11
.
97.
Hall
EA
,
Hartzband
P
,
VanderLaan
PA
,
Nishino
M
.
Risk stratification of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic or benign cytology on repeat FNA: implications for molecular testing and surveillance
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2023
;
131
(
5
):
313
24
.
98.
Lastra
RR
,
Pramick
MR
,
Crammer
CJ
,
LiVolsi
VA
,
Baloch
ZW
.
Implications of a suspicious afirma test result in thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology: an institutional experience
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2014
;
122
(
10
):
737
44
.
99.
Nasuti
JF
,
Gupta
PK
,
Baloch
ZW
.
Diagnostic value and cost-effectiveness of on-site evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens: review of 5,688 cases
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2002
;
27
(
1
):
1
4
.
100.
Baloch
ZW
,
Tam
D
,
Langer
J
,
Mandel
S
,
LiVolsi
VA
,
Gupta
PK
.
Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid: role of on-site assessment and multiple cytologic preparations
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2000
;
23
(
6
):
425
9
.
101.
Barbosa
TLM
,
Junior
COM
,
Graf
H
,
Cavalvanti
T
,
Trippia
MA
,
da Silveira Ugino
RT
et al
.
ACR TI-RADS and ATA US scores are helpful for the management of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology
.
BMC Endocr Disord
.
2019
;
19
(
1
):
112
.
102.
Hong
MJ
,
Na
DG
,
Baek
JH
,
Sung
JY
,
Kim
JH
.
Cytology-Ultrasonography risk-stratification scoring system based on fine-needle aspiration cytology and the Korean-thyroid imaging reporting and data system
.
Thyroid
.
2017
;
27
(
7
):
953
9
.