Objective: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) diagnosis of salivary gland neoplasms with epithelial/myoepithelial cells but rare or no stroma is usually difficult. Our aim was to study the cytomorphology of this cohort of FNA cases and evaluate the clinical follow-up. Study Design: The diagnostic terminology for this group of aspirates was ‘favor an epithelial/myoepithelial neoplasm of the salivary gland’. The cytologic smears of 32 such cases were retrieved and showed cellular smears with bland-appearing or mildly atypical epithelial and myoepithelial cells without typical chondromyxoid stroma seen in pleomorphic adenoma (PA). Results: Twenty of the 32 cases had histologic follow-up. Ten of these 20 cases were PAs, including 8 cellular PAs. Two cases were basal cell adenomas, 1 case myoepithelioma and 1 case benign adenoma, not otherwise specified. Among the 6 malignant tumors on surgical resections, there were 3 epithelial-myoepithelial carcinomas, 1 myoepithelial carcinoma, 1 basal cell adenocarcinoma and 1 adenoid cystic carcinoma. Conclusions: Although 14 of the 20 (70%) cases were benign neoplasms, a substantial amount of cases (30%) were malignant salivary gland neoplasms. The generic diagnostic terminology of ‘epithelial/myoepithelial neoplasm of the salivary gland’ and appropriate clinical follow-up are recommended for these cases.

1.
Cristallini EG, Ascani S, Farabi R, et al: Fine needle aspiration biopsy of salivary gland, 1985–1995. Acta Cytol 1997;41:1421–1425.
2.
Stewart CJ, MacKenzie K, McGarry GW, Mowat A: Fine-needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland: a review of 341 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2000;22:139–146.
3.
Schindler S, Nayar R, Dutra J, Bedrossian CW: Diagnostic challenges in aspiration cytology of the salivary glands. Semin Diagn Pathol 2001;18:124–146.
4.
Christensen RK, Bjorndal K, Godballe C, Krogdahl A: Value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy of salivary gland lesions. Head Neck 2010;32:104–108.
5.
Klijanienko J, Vielh P: Fine-needle sampling of salivary gland lesions. 3. Cytologic and histologic correlation of 75 cases of adenoid cystic carcinoma: review and experience at the Institut Curie with emphasis on cytologic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17:36–41.
6.
Klijanienko J, El-Naggar AK, Vielh P: Comparative cytologic and histologic study of fifteen salivary basal-cell tumors; differential diagnostic considerations. Diagn Cytopathol 1999;21:30–34.
7.
Darvishian F, Lin O: Myoepithelial cell-rich neoplasms: cytologic features of benign and malignant lesions. Cancer (Cytopathol) 2004;102:355–361.
8.
Khademi B, Kazemi T, Bayat A, Bahranifard H, Daneshbod Y, Mohammadianpanah M: Salivary gland myoepithelial neoplasms: a clinical and cytopathologic study of 15 cases and review of the literature. Acta Cytol 2010;54:1111–1117.
9.
Colella G, Cannavale R, Flamminio F, Foschini MP: Fine-needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland lesions: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:2146–2153.
10.
O’Dwyer P, Farrar WB, James AG, Finkelmeier W, McCabe DP: Needle aspiration biopsy of major salivary gland tumors. Its value. Cancer 1986;57:554–557.
11.
Layfield LJ, Glasgow BJ: Diagnosis of salivary gland tumors by fine-needle aspiration cytology: a review of clinical utility and pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 1991;7:267–272.
12.
Mukunyadzi P: Review of fine-needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland neoplasms, with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Am J Clin Pathol 2002;118(suppl):S100–S115.
13.
Al-Abbadi MA: Pitfalls in salivary gland fine-needle aspiration cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:1428, author reply 1428.
14.
Rajwanshi A, Gupta K, Gupta N, et al: Fine-needle aspiration cytology of salivary glands: diagnostic pitfalls – revisited. Diagn Cytopathol 2006;34:580–584.
15.
Daneshbod Y, Daneshbod K, Khademi B: Diagnostic difficulties in the interpretation of fine needle aspirate samples in salivary lesions: diagnostic pitfalls revisited. Acta Cytol 2009;53:53–70.
16.
Klijanienko J, Vielh P: Fine-needle sampling of salivary gland lesions. 1. Cytology and histology correlation of 412 cases of pleomorphic adenoma. Diagn Cytopathol 1996;14:195–200.
17.
Savera AT, Zarbo RJ: Defining the role of myoepithelium in salivary gland neoplasia. Adv Anat Pathol 2004;11:69–85.
18.
Elsheikh TM, Bernacki EG: Fine needle aspiration cytology of cellular pleomorphic adenoma. Acta Cytol 1996;40:1165–1175.
19.
Handa U, Dhingra N, Chopra R, Mohan H: Pleomorphic adenoma: cytologic variations and potential diagnostic pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 2009;37:11–15.
20.
Gahine R, Sudarshan V, Hussain N, Krishnani C: Pleomorphic adenoma: a diagnostic pitfall in the diagnosis of salivary gland lesions on FNAC: case reports with review of the literature. Cytojournal 2010;7:17.
21.
Chhieng DC, Paulino AF: Basaloid tumors of the salivary glands. Ann Diagn Pathol 2002;6:364–372.
22.
Hara H, Oyama T, Saku T: Fine needle aspiration cytology of basal cell adenoma of the salivary gland. Acta Cytol 2007;51:685–691.
23.
Khademi B, Kazemi T, Bayat A: Salivary gland myoepithelial neoplasms: a clinical and cytopathologic study of 15 cases and review of the literature. Acta Cytol 2010;54:1111–1117.
24.
Lee SS, Cho KJ, Jang JJ, Ham EK: Differential diagnosis of adenoid cystic carcinoma from pleomorphic adenoma of the salivary gland on fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 1996;40:1246–1252.
25.
Stanley MW, Horwitz CA, Rollins SD, et al: Basal cell (monomorphic) and minimally pleomorphic adenomas of the salivary glands. Distinction from the solid (anaplastic) type of adenoid cystic carcinoma in fine-needle aspiration. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;106:35–41.
26.
Seethala RR, Barnes EL, Hunt JL: Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma: a review of the clinicopathologic spectrum and immunophenotypic characteristics in 61 tumors of the salivary glands and upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg Pathol 2007;31:44–57.
27.
Roy P, Bullock MJ, Perez-Ordonez B, Dardick I, Weinreb I: Epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma with high grade transformation. Am J Surg Pathol 2010;34:1258–1265.
28.
Miliauskas JR, Orell SR: Fine-needle aspiration cytological findings in five cases of epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma of salivary glands. Diagn Cytopathol 2003;28:163–167.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.