Introduction: Demonstration of diagnostic contribution of Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology-standardized nomenclature for pancreaticobiliary cytology (PSC-PC) in endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) fine-needle biopsy (FNA) biopsies is important for widespread use and further development. Methods: 179 EUS-FNA biopsies (89: solid, 90: cystic) and PSC-PC categories were compared with surgical definite histopathology and definite clinical diagnosis. Overall risk of malignancy (oROM) was calculated for each PSC-PC category. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated. Results: The cytopathology of lesions was nondiagnostic in 27%. Ductal dilatation, lymphadenopathy, and solid characteristic (independently) were associated with diagnostic result, while lesion size was not. PSC-PC categories had 89% diagnostic consistency with surgical definite histopathology. Category mismatch was detected in 3 patients (11%), of which 2 had adenocarcinoma. oROM was 14.3% for nondiagnostic group, 46% for cat. III (atypia), and 12% for cat. IVB (neoplastic – other). In terms of malignancy, the PSC-PC system had 100% specificity; PPV, 92% sensitivity, and 81% NPV; and the diagnostic accuracy was 94%. Conclusion: Using PSC-PC in EUS-FNA biopsies, pancreatic malignancy can be diagnosed with high diagnostic accuracy. In mucinous cystic lesions, some malignancies may be missed. To predict the malignancy risk of cat. IVB, assessment of dysplasia seems important. Although PSC-PC is not the only parameter in terms of diagnosing malignancy, its contribution to the clinical decision is quite high.

Keywords:
Endoscopic ultrasonography, Fine-needle aspiration biopsy, Pancreatic lesion, Cytopathology
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel
2022
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.