Objective: Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is the standard diagnostic tool recommended by consensus management guidelines for preoperative evaluation of salivary gland tumors in adults. However, its utility in the pediatric population remains debated due to a paucity of data and inherited challenges of pediatric management (patient cooperation, the need for sedation, and procedural complications). Methods: Consecutive series of 92 FNA biopsies of pediatric salivary gland lesions with available procedural data were included for retrospective analysis. Patient demographics, procedural characteristics, and complications were assessed. Results: Sixty-three patients (68%) tolerated FNA without sedation. Sedation need was significantly associated with younger age, concurrent non-FNA procedure requiring sedation, ultrasound guidance, interventional radiologist as the proceduralist, and radiology suite as the facility setting. The sedation rates for children, and early, middle, and late adolescents were 69%, 32%, 12%, and 10%, respectively, with an optimal cutoff point of ≤12 years for age derived from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. No significant procedural complications were observed. Sedation did not provide significantly better diagnostic yield. Conclusion: FNA biopsy of salivary gland tumors is safe, well tolerated by the pediatric population, and can be effectively performed in an outpatient setting without sedation in most cases. FNA biopsy is a useful tool in the preoperative management of pediatric patients with salivary gland tumors.

Keywords:
Pediatric, Fine-needle aspiration, Salivary gland, Compliance, Tolerability, Cooperation, Sedation, Anesthesia, Complication
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel
2022
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.