Introduction: The reported ROM within TBSRTC categories varies widely and depends on several factors in the clinical care pathway for thyroid nodules, including sonographic risk stratification, cytology expertise, selection criteria for surgical resection, and definitions of malignancy used. Methods: We present 5,867 consecutive thyroid FNAC and corresponding surgical pathology in the context of a comprehensive, single-payer health care system with centralized cytology and surgical pathology services for over 1.5 million inhabitants. Results: We report higher usage of ND and AUS/FLUS categories than the literature (19% vs. <10% and 15% vs. <10%, respectively). Our surgical resection rate for malignant cytology is substantially higher than the literature (94% vs. 50%, respectively). The ROM by the TBSRTC category in our cohort was similar to the literature. The overall diagnostic accuracy of thyroid FNAC was 92%, which is similar to other studies. Inclusion of incidental PMC as histologically malignant raised the ROM in the ND, benign, and AUS/FLUS categories. Discussion: The diagnostic performance of thyroid FNAC in our study is similar to the reported literature. Differences in TBSRTC category usage likely arise from cytologist variability and expertise. Our higher surgical resection rate in the malignant cytology category reflects the greater capture of surgical follow-up within our healthcare region with centralized pathology and a single EMR system. Keeping in mind the method of calculation of ROM, the malignancy rate by TBSRTC is similar to previous reports.

Keywords:
Bethesda, Thyroid cytology, Fine-needle aspiration biopsy, Thyroid nodule
© 2022 S. Karger AG, Basel
2022
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.