Introduction: Low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumors (LEATs) create a diagnostic challenge in daily practice and intraoperative pathological consultation (IC) in particular. Squash smears are extremely useful in IC for accurate diagnosis; however, the knowledge on cytopathologic features of LEATs is based on individual case reports. Here, we discuss the 3 most common and well-established entities of LEATs: ganglioglioma (GG), dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNT), and papillary glioneuronal tumor (PGNT). Methods: Thirty patients who underwent surgery for GG, DNT, and PGNT between 2001 and 2021 were collected. Squash smears prepared during intraoperative consultation were reviewed by 1 cytopathologist and an experienced neuropathologist. Results: Among the 30 tumors, 16 (53.3%) were GG, 11 (36.6%) DNT, and 3 (10%) PGNT. Cytomorphologically, all of the 3 tumor types share 2 common features such as dual cell population and vasculocentric pattern. GG smears were characteristically composed of dysplastic ganglion cells and piloid-like astrocytes on a complex architectural background of thin- to thick-walled vessels. DNT, on the other hand, showed oligodendroglial-like cells in a myxoid thin fibrillary background associated with a delicate capillary network. Common cytological features of PGNT were hyperchromatic cells with narrow cytoplasm surrounding hyalinized vessels forming a pseudopapillary pattern and bland cells with neuroendocrine nuclei dispersed in a neuropil background. Conclusion: A higher diagnostic accuracy can be obtained when squash smears are applied with frozen sections. However, it is important to integrate clinical and radiologic features of the patient as well as to know the cytopathologic features of the LEAT spectrum in the context of differential diagnosis to prevent misinterpretation in the IC.

1.
Blumcke
I
,
Spreafico
R
,
Haaker
G
,
Coras
R
,
Kobow
K
,
Bien
CG
,
Histopathological findings in brain tissue obtained during epilepsy surgery
.
N Engl J Med
.
2017
;
377
(
17
):
1648
56
.
2.
Blümcke
I
,
Aronica
E
,
Becker
A
,
Capper
D
,
Coras
R
,
Honavar
M
,
Low-grade epilepsy-associated neuroepithelial tumours: the 2016 WHO classification
.
Nat Rev Neurol
.
2016
;
12
(
12
):
732
40
.
3.
Slegers
RJ
,
Blumcke
I
.
Low-grade developmental and epilepsy associated brain tumors: a critical update 2020
.
Acta Neuropathol Commun
.
2020
;
8
(
1
):
27
.
4.
Louis
DN
,
Ohgaki
H
,
Wiestler
OD
,
Cavenee
WK
, editors.
WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system (revised 4th edition)
.
Lyon
:
IARC
;
2016
.
5.
White
VA
,
Trotter
MJ
.
Intraoperative consultation/final diagnosis correlation: relationship to tissue type and pathologic process
.
Arch Pathol Lab Med
.
2008
;
132
(
1
):
29
36
.
6.
Mahe
E
,
Ara
S
,
Bishara
M
,
Kurian
A
,
Tauqir
S
,
Ursani
N
,
Intraoperative pathology consultation: error, cause and impact
.
Can J Surg
.
2013
;
56
(
3
):
E13
8
.
7.
Sharma
S
,
Deb
P
.
Intraoperative neurocytology of primary central nervous system neoplasia: a simplified and practical diagnostic approach
.
J Cytol
.
2011
;
28
(
4
):
147
58
.
8.
Fuller
C
.
A little piece of mind: best practices for brain tumor intraoperative consultation
.
Mod Pathol
.
2019
;
32
(
Suppl 1
):
44
57
.
9.
Qaddoumi
I
,
Orisme
W
,
Wen
J
,
Santiago
T
,
Gupta
K
,
Dalton
JD
,
Genetic alterations in uncommon low-grade neuroepithelial tumors: BRAF, FGFR1, and MYB mutations occur at high frequency and align with morphology
.
Acta Neuropathol
.
2016
;
131
(
6
):
833
45
.
10.
Pekmezci
M
,
Villanueva-Meyer
JE
,
Goode
B
,
Van Ziffle
J
,
Onodera
C
,
Grenert
JP
,
The genetic landscape of ganglioglioma
.
Acta Neuropathol Commun
.
2018
;
6
(
1
):
47
.
11.
Park
JY
,
Suh
YL
,
Han
J
.
Dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor. Features distinguishing it from oligodendroglioma on cytologic squash preparations
.
Acta Cytol
.
2003
;
47
(
4
):
624
9
.
12.
Doxtader
EE
,
Sturgis
CD
.
Cytopathologic features of papillary glioneuronal tumor
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2018
;
46
(
3
):
284
6
.
13.
Bleggi-Torres
LF
,
Netto
MR
,
Gasparetto
EL
,
Gonçalves
ESA
,
Moro
M
.
Dysembrioplastic neuroepithelial tumor: cytological diagnosis by intraoperative smear preparation
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2002
;
26
(
2
):
92
4
.
14.
Puzyrenko
A
,
Cochran
E
,
Giorgadze
T
,
Nomani
L
.
Papillary glioneuronal tumors: Distinctive cytological characteristics and cyto-histologic correlation
.
Ann Diagn Pathol
.
2021
;
53
:
151757
.
15.
Blümcke
I
,
Coras
R
,
Wefers
AK
,
Capper
D
,
Aronica
E
,
Becker
A
,
Review: challenges in the histopathological classification of ganglioglioma and DNT: microscopic agreement studies and a preliminary genotype-phenotype analysis
.
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol
.
2019
;
45
(
2
):
95
107
.
16.
Krishnani
N
,
Kumari
N
,
Behari
S
,
Rana
C
,
Gupta
P
.
Intraoperative squash cytology: accuracy and impact on immediate surgical management of central nervous system tumours
.
Cytopathology
.
2012
;
23
(
5
):
308
14
.
17.
Lacruz
CR
,
Catalina-Fernández
I
,
Bardales
RH
,
Pimentel
J
,
López-Presa
D
,
Sáenz-Santamaría
J
.
Intraoperative consultation on pediatric central nervous system tumors by squash cytology
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2015
;
123
(
6
):
331
46
.
18.
Hamasaki
M
,
Chang
KHF
,
Nabeshima
K
,
Tauchi-Nishi
PS
.
Intraoperative squash and touch preparation cytology of brain lesions stained with H+E and diff-quik™: a 20-year retrospective analysis and comparative literature review
.
Acta Cytol
.
2018
;
62
(
1
):
44
53
.
19.
Perry
A
,
Giannini
C
,
Scheithauer
BW
,
Rojiani
AM
,
Yachnis
AT
,
Seo
IS
,
Composite pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma and ganglioglioma: report of four cases and review of the literature
.
Am J Surg Pathol
.
1997
;
21
(
7
):
763
71
.
20.
Varikatt
W
,
Dexter
M
,
Mahajan
H
,
Murali
R
,
Ng
T
.
Usefulness of smears in intra-operative diagnosis of newly described entities of CNS
.
Neuropathology
.
2009
;
29
(
6
):
641
8
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.