Introduction: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is increasingly used for nongynecologic applications. However, the cytological preparation of LBC specimens is influenced by the processing technique and the preservative used. In this study, the influence of the processing techniques and preservatives on cell morphology was examined mathematically and statistically. Methods: Cytological specimens were prepared using the ThinPrep (TP), SurePath (SP), and AutoSmear methods, with 5 different preservative solutions. The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas of Papanicolaou-stained specimens were measured for all samples. Results: The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas were smaller in cells prepared using the 2 LBC methods, compared to that prepared using the AutoSmear method, irrespective of the preservative used. The cytoplasmic and nuclear areas of cells prepared using the SP method were smaller than those of cells prepared using the TP method, irrespective of the preservative used. There were fewer differences among the cytoplasmic areas of cells prepared with different preservative solutions using the TP method; however, the cytoplasmic areas of cells prepared using the SP method changed with the preservative solution used. Conclusions: The most significant difference affecting the cytoplasmic and nuclear areas was the processing technique. The TP method increased the cytoplasmic and nuclear areas, while the methanol-based PreservCyt solution enabled the highest enlargement of the cell. LBC is a superior preparation technique for standardization of the specimens. Our results offer a better understanding of methods suitable for specimen preparation for developing precision AI-based diagnosis in cytology.

1.
Elsheikh
TM
,
Kirkpatrick
JL
,
Wu
HH
.
Comparison of ThinPrep and cytospin preparations in the evaluation of exfoliative cytology specimens
.
Cancer
.
2006 Jun
;
108
(
3
):
144
9
. .
2.
Hoda
RS
.
Non-gynecologic cytology on liquid-based preparations: a morphologic review of facts and artifacts
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2007 Oct
;
35
(
10
):
621
34
. .
3.
Leung
CS
,
Chiu
B
,
Bell
V
.
Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations: nongynecologic cytology evaluation
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
1997 Apr
;
16
(
4
):
368
71
. .
4.
Cox
JT
.
Liquid-based cytology: evaluation of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and application of present practice
.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw
.
2004 Nov
;
2
(
6
):
597
611
.
5.
Michael
CW
,
McConnel
J
,
Pecott
J
,
Afify
AM
,
Al-Khafaji
B
.
Comparison of ThinPrep and TriPath PREP liquid-based preparations in nongynecologic specimens: a pilot study
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2001 Sep
;
25
(
3
):
177
84
. .
6.
Biscotti
CV
,
Dawson
AE
,
Dziura
B
,
Galup
L
,
Darragh
T
,
Rahemtulla
A
,
Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep imaging system
.
Am J Clin Pathol
.
2005 Feb
;
123
(
2
):
281
7
. .
7.
Wilbur
DC
,
Black-Schaffer
WS
,
Luff
RD
,
Abraham
KP
,
Kemper
C
,
Molina
JT
,
The Becton Dickinson FocalPoint GS imaging system: clinical trials demonstrate significantly improved sensitivity for the detection of important cervical lesions
.
Am J Clin Pathol
.
2009 Nov
;
132
(
5
):
767
75
. .
8.
Sornapudi
S
,
Brown
GT
,
Xue
Z
,
Long
R
,
Allen
L
,
Antani
S
.
Comparing deep learning models for multi-cell classification in liquid- based cervical cytology image
.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc
.
2020 Mar 4
;
2019
:
820
7
; eCollection 2019.
9.
McAlpine
ED
,
Pantanowitz
L
,
Michelow
PM
.
Challenges developing deep learning algorithms in cytology
.
Acta Cytol
.
2021
;
65
:
301
9
.
10.
Zhang
L
,
Kong
H
,
Ting Chin
C
,
Liu
S
,
Fan
X
,
Wang
T
,
Automation-assisted cervical cancer screening in manual liquid-based cytology with hematoxylin and eosin staining
.
Cytometry A
.
2014 Mar
;
85
(
3
):
214
30
. .
11.
Ikeda
K
,
Sato
S
,
Chigira
H
,
Shibuki
Y
,
Hiraoka
N
.
Characterizing the effect of automated cell sorting solutions on cytomorphological changes
.
Acta Cytol
.
2020 Jun
;
64
(
3
):
232
40
. .
12.
Gupta
P
,
Gupta
N
,
Dey
P
.
Morphometric analysis of endometrial cells in liquid-based cervical cytology samples
.
Cytopathology
.
2017 Apr
;
28
(
2
):
140
8
. .
13.
Ikeda
K
,
Tsuta
K
.
Effusion cytomorphology of small round cell tumors
.
J Cytol
.
2016 Apr–Jun
;
33
(
2
):
85
92
. .
14.
Norimatsu
Y
,
Sakamoto
S
,
Ohsaki
H
,
Ozaki
S
,
Yokoyama
T
,
Shimizu
K
,
Cytologic features of the endometrial adenocarcinoma: comparison of ThinPrep and BD SurePath preparations
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2013 Aug
;
41
(
8
):
673
81
. .
15.
Park
GS
,
Lee
SH
,
Jung
SL
,
Jung
CK
.
Liquid-based cytology in the fine needle aspiration of parathyroid lesions: a comparison study with the conventional smear, ThinPrep, and SurePath
.
Int J Clin Exp Pathol
.
2015 Oct
;
8
(
10
):
12160
8
.
16.
Sweeney
BJ
,
Haq
Z
,
Happel
JF
,
Weinstein
B
,
Schneider
D
.
Comparison of the effectiveness of two liquid-based Papanicolaou systems in the handling of adverse limiting factors, such as excessive blood
.
Cancer
.
2006 Feb
;
108
(
1
):
27
31
. .
17.
Belsley
NA
,
Tambouret
RH
,
Misdraji
J
,
Muzikansky
A
,
Russell
DK
,
Wilbur
DC
.
Cytologic features of endocervical glandular lesions: comparison of SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional smear specimen preparations
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2008 Apr
;
36
(
4
):
232
7
. .
18.
Wright
PK
,
Marshall
J
,
Desai
M
.
Comparison of SurePath® and ThinPrep® liquid-based cervical cytology using positive predictive value, atypical predictive value and total predictive value as performance indicators
.
Cytopathology
.
2010 Dec
;
21
(
6
):
374
8
. .
19.
Ren
S
,
Solomides
C
,
Draganova-Tacheva
R
,
Bibbo
M
.
Overview of nongynecological samples prepared with liquid-based cytology medium
.
Acta Cytol
.
2014 Dec
;
58
(
6
):
522
32
. .
20.
Kenyon
S
,
Sweeney
BJ
,
Happel
J
,
Marchilli
GE
,
Weinstein
B
,
Schneider
D
.
Comparison of BD Surepath and ThinPrep pap systems in the processing of mucus-rich specimens
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2010 Oct
;
118
(
5
):
244
9
. .
21.
Stoler
MH
.
Advances in cervical screening technology
.
Mod Pathol
.
2000 Mar
;
13
(
3
):
275
84
. .
22.
Ikenberg
H
.
[Computer-assisted diagnostics in cervical cytology]
.
Pathologe
.
2011 Nov
;
32
(
6
):
476
83
. German. .
23.
Sompawong
N
,
Mopan
J
,
Pooprasert
P
,
Himakhun
W
,
Suwannarurk
K
,
Ngamvirojcharoen
J
,
Automated Pap smear cervical cancer screening using deep learning
.
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc
.
2019 Jul2019
;
2019
:
7044
8
. .
24.
Landau
MS
,
Pantanowitz
L
.
Artificial intelligence in cytopathology: a review of the literature and overview of commercial landscape
.
J Am Soc Cytopathol
.
2019 Jul–Aug
;
8
(
4
):
230
41
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.