Background and Objective: The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama system for reporting breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) cytopathology has been proposed to standardize breast FNAB reporting. The aim of this study was to categorize breast FNAB cases performed by palpation without radiological guidance according to the IAC system, establish the risk of malignancy (ROM) for the categories and assess the system’s utility, pitfalls, and implications in low-resource/financial constraint settings. Methods: A retrospective analysis of palpation-guided FNAB of breast lesions performed without radiological guidance between January 2016 and December 2019 was carried out and was correlated with follow-up biopsies wherever available. A total of 1,089 cases were recategorized using the IAC Yokohama system. Histopathology follow-up was available for 400 cases. The data were analysed for ROM, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results and Discussion: Out of 1,089 cases, 4.3% (n = 47) cases were categorized as insufficient, 82% (n = 893) as benign, 2.8% (n = 31) as atypical, 2.7% (n = 29) as suspicious of malignancy, and 8.2% (n = 89) as malignant. Some 400 cases had a follow-up biopsy, based on which, the ROM for the categories were 33.3%, 0.4%, 37.5%, 96%, and 100%. The NPV for the benign category was 99.6%. The PPV of the malignant category was 100%, that of combined suspicious of malignancy and malignant categories was 99%, and of combined atypical, suspicious of malignancy, and malignant was 90.6%. Conclusion: The IAC Yokohama system is useful in standardizing the reporting of cytopathology of breast lesions. FNAB with radiological guidance is ideal but in cases of finance/resource constraints, FNAB by palpation alone is satisfactory if the test result is in the benign, suspicious of malignancy, or malignant categories, which constitute 91.5% of the cases in this study. A repeat ultrasound-guided FNAB and/or core needle biopsy should be recommended for cases in the insufficient/inadequate or atypical categories.

1.
Jemal
A
,
Bray
F
,
Center
MM
,
Ferlay
J
,
Ward
E
,
Forman
D
.
Global cancer statistics
.
Cancer J Clin
.
2011
;
61
(
2
):
69
90
.
2.
Bulgaresi
P
,
Cariaggi
P
,
Ciatto
S
,
Houssami
N
.
Positive predictive value of breast fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in combination with clinical and imaging findings: a series of 2334 subjects with abnormal cytology
.
Breast Cancer Res Treat
.
2006
;
97
(
3
):
319
21
.
3.
Yu
YH
,
Wei
W
,
Liu
JL
.
Diagnostic value of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for breast mass: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
BMC Cancer
.
2012
;
12
:
41
54
. .
4.
The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. National Cancer Institute Fine-Needle Aspiration of Breast Workshop Subcommittees
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
1997
;
16
(
4
):
295
11
.
5.
Kocjan
G
,
Bourgain
C
,
Fassina
A
,
Hagmar
B
,
Herbert
A
,
Kapila
K
,
The role of breast FNAC in diagnosis and clinical management: a survey of current practice
.
Cytopathology
.
2008
;
19
:
271
8
. .
6.
Chaiwun
B
,
Settakorn
J
,
Ya-In
C
,
Wisedmongkol
W
,
Rangdaeng
S
,
Thorner
P
.
Effectiveness of fine-needle aspiration cytology of breast: analysis of 2,375 cases from northern Thailand
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2002
;
26
(
3
):
201
5
. .
7.
Abdel-Hadi
M
,
Abdel-Hamid
GF
,
Abdel-Razak
N
,
Fawzy
RK
.
Should fine-needle aspiration cytology be the first choice diagnostic modality for assessment of all nonpalpable breast lesions? The experience of a breast cancer screening center in Alexandria Egypt
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2010
;
38
(
12
):
880
9
.
8.
Garud
HT
,
Sheet
D
,
Mahadevappa
M
,
Chatterjee
J
,
Ray
AK
,
Ghosh
A
.
Breast fine needle aspiration cytology practices and commonly perceived significance of cytological features: a pan-India survey
.
J Cytol
.
2012
;
29
(
3
):
183
9
.
9.
Bukhari
MH
,
Arshad
M
,
Jamal
S
,
Niazi
S
,
Bashir
S
,
Bakhshi
IM
,
Use of fine-needle aspiration in evaluation of breast lumps
.
Pathol Res Int
.
2011
;
2011
:
689521
.
10.
The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. National Cancer Institute Fine-Needle Aspiration of Breast Workshop Subcommittees
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
1997 Apr
;
16
(
4
):
295
311
.
11.
Nkonge
KM
,
Rogena
EA
,
Walong
EO
,
Nkonge
DK
.
Cytological evaluation of breast lesions in symptomatic patients presenting to Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya: a retrospective study
.
BMC Womens Health
.
2015
;
15
(
1
):
118
.
12.
Field
,
AS
,
Raymond
,
W
,
Schmitt
,
F
, editors.
The IAC Yokohama system for reporting breast FNAB cytology
.
Switzerland
:
Springer
;
2020
.
13.
Field
AS
,
Schmitt
F
,
Vielh
P
.
IAC standardized reporting of breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy cytology
.
Acta Cytol
.
2017
;
61
:
3
6
. .
14.
Chopra
B
,
Kaur
V
,
Singh
K
,
Verma
M
,
Singh
S
,
Singh
A
.
Age shift: breast cancer is occurring in younger age groups–is it true?
Clin Cancer Investig J
.
2014
;
3
(
6
):
526
9
.
15.
SEER 21 2013–2017. National Cancer Institute.
16.
Orell
S
,
Sterrett
G
.
Fine needle aspiration cytology
. 5th ed.
Edinburgh
:
Churchill Livingstone
;
2012
.
17.
Ciatto
S
,
Cariaggi
P
,
Confortini
M
,
Bonardi
R
.
Fine fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast: review of 9533 consecutive cases
.
Breast
.
1993
;
2
:
87
90
.
18.
Aasmund
B
,
Sauer
T
.
Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast
.
Ultrastruct Pathol
.
2011
;
35
(
4
):
162
7
.
19.
Wong
YP
,
Vincent James
EP
,
Mohammad Azhar
MAA
,
Krishnamoorthy
Y
,
Zainudin
NA
,
Zamara
F
,
Implementation of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama standardized reporting for breast cytopathology: an 8-year retrospective study
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2021 Jun
;
49
(
6
):
718
26
. .
20.
Wong
S
,
Rickard
M
,
Earls
P
,
Arnold
L
,
Bako
B
,
Field
AS
.
The IAC Yokohama System for reporting breast FNAB cytology: a single institutional retrospective study of the application of the system and the impact of ROSE
.
Acta Cytol
.
2019
;
63
:
280
91
.
21.
Montezuma
D
,
Malheiros
D
,
Schmitt
F
.
Breast FNAB cytology using the newly proposed IAC Yokohama system for reporting breast cytopathology: the experience of a single institution
.
Acta Cytol
.
2019
;
63
:
274
9
.
22.
Panwar
H
,
Ingle
P
,
Santosh
T
,
Singh
V
,
Bugalia
A
,
Hussain
N
.
FNAC of breast lesions with special reference to IAC standardized reporting and comparative study of cytohistological grading of breast carcinoma
.
J Cytol
.
2020
;
37
:
34
9
. .
23.
Chauhan
V
,
Pujani
M
,
Agarwal
C
,
Chandoke
RK
,
Raychaudhuri
S
,
Singh
K
,
IAC standardized reporting of breast fine-needle aspiration cytology, Yokohama 2016: a critical appraisal over a 2 year period
.
Breast Dis
.
2019
;
38
(
3–4
):
109
15
. .
24.
De Rosa
F
,
Migliatico
I
,
Vigliar
E
,
Salatiello
M
,
Pisapia
P
,
Iaccarino
A
,
The continuing role of breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy after the introduction of the IAC Yokohama system for reporting breast fine needle aspiration biopsy cytopathology
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2020 Dec
;
48
(
12
):
1244
53
. .
25.
Agarwal
A
,
Singh
D
,
Mehan
A
,
Paul
P
,
Puri
N
,
Gupta
P
,
Accuracy of the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama system of breast cytology reporting for fine needle aspiration biopsy of the breast in a dedicated breast care setting
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2021 Feb
;
49
(
2
):
195
202
. .
26.
Kamatar
PV
,
Athanikar
VS
,
Dinesh
U
.
Breast fine needle aspiration biopsy cytology reporting using International Academy of Cytology Yokohama system-two year retrospective study in tertiary care centre in Southern India
.
Njlm
.
2019
;
8
(
3
):
1
3
. .
27.
Maritz
RM
,
Michelow
PM
.
Cytological criteria to distinguish phyllodes tumour of the breast from fibroadenoma
.
Acta Cytol
.
2017
;
61
(
6
):
418
24
. .
28.
Field
A
,
Mak
A
.
A prospective study of the diagnostic accuracy of cytological criteria in the FNAB diagnosis of breast papillomas
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2007
;
35
:
465
75
. .
29.
Weigner
J
,
Zardawi
I
,
Braye
S
,
McElduff
P
.
The conundrum of papillary breast lesions within the C3 category
.
Acta Cytol
.
2015
;
59
:
289
97
. .
30.
Tse
GM
,
Ma
TK
,
Lui
PC
,
Ng
DC
,
Yu
AM
,
Vong
JS
,
Fine needle aspiration cytology of papillary lesions of the breast: how accurate is the diagnosis?
J Clin Pathol
.
2008
;
61
(
8
):
945
9
. .
31.
Field
A
,
Mak
A
.
The fine needle aspiration biopsy diagnostic criteria of proliferative breast lesions: a retrospective statistical analysis of criteria for papillomas and radial scar lesions
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2007
;
35
(
7
):
386
97
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.