Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is an important ancillary technique in clinical cytology for not only identifying and characterizing tumor cells but also gaining prognostic or therapeutic information. Although cell blocks are often prepared for immunocytochemical evaluation of body cavity fluid and fine-needle aspiration specimens, they are not suitable for hypocellular samples. Liquid-based cytology can help prepare additional smears from residual cytological specimens. However, since conventional methods are used for nongynecological specimens in most laboratories, ICC is often limited by the number of cytological smears. Cell transfer methods permit to evaluate several immunocytochemical markers in a single cytological smear. Yet, these methods have some limitations; for example, they are time-consuming (about 3–40 h) and medium membranes with their attached cells are occasionally stretched or torn when peeled off the slides. Therefore, in an attempt to solve these problems, we developed a rapid and reliable cell transfer method using a nylon mesh. Our method requires no special equipment or reagent and can significantly reduce the turnaround time, as compared to previous methods.

1.
Gong
Y
,
Joseph
T
,
Sneige
N
.
Validation of commonly used immunostains on cell-transferred cytologic specimens
.
Cancer
.
2005 Jun 25
;
105
(
3
):
158
64
. .
2.
Marshall
AE
,
Cramer
HM
,
Wu
HH
.
The usefulness of the cell transfer technique for immunocytochemistry of fine-needle aspirates
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
201sDec
;
122
(
12
):
898
902
. .
3.
Metovic
J
,
Righi
L
,
Delsedime
L
,
Volante
M
,
Papotti
M
.
Role of immunocytochemistry in the cytological diagnosis of pulmonary tumors
.
Acta Cytol
.
2020
;
64
(
1–2
):
16
29
. .
4.
Brown
GG
,
Tao
LC
.
Restoration of broken cytology slides and creation of multiple slides from a single smear preparation
.
Acta Cytol
.
1992
;
36
(
2
):
259
63
.
5.
Sherman
ME
,
Jimenez-Joseph
D
,
Gangi
MD
,
Rojas-Corona
RR
.
Immunostaining of small cytologic specimens. Facilitation with cell transfer
.
Acta Cytol
.
1994 Jan–Feb
;
38
(
1
):
18
22
.
6.
Kaneko
C
,
Funahashi
M
,
Kato
K
,
Kobayashi
TK
.
Application of the cell block method, utilizing mount quick mounting medium
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2000
;
22
(
2
):
117
9
. .
7.
Itoh
H
,
Miyajima
Y
,
Osamura
Y
,
Tsutsumi
Y
.
A study of quick “cell transfer” technique
.
J Jpn Soc Clin Cytol
.
2002
;
41
(
4
):
302
3
. (in Japanese). .
8.
Oh
EJ
,
Hong
SW
,
Jeong
HJ
,
Yoon
SO
.
The diagnostic approach to fine-needle aspiration of malignant lymphoma: using cytomorphology and immunocytochemistry with cell transfer method
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2014 Aug
;
42
(
8
):
671
9
. .
9.
Ferguson
J
,
Chamberlain
P
,
Cramer
HM
,
Wu
HH
.
ER, PR, and Her2 immunocytochemistry on cell-transferred cytologic smears of primary and metastatic breast carcinomas: a comparison study with formalin-fixed cell blocks and surgical biopsies
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2013 Jul
;
41
(
7
):
575
81
. .
10.
Travis
WD
,
Brambilla
E
,
Noguchi
M
,
Nicholson
AG
,
Geisinger
K
,
Yatabe
Y
,
Diagnosis of lung cancer in small biopsies and cytology: implications of the 2011 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Classification
.
Arch Pathol Lab Med
.
2013 May
;
137
(
5
):
668
84
. .
11.
Shabaik
A
,
Lin
G
,
Peterson
M
,
Hasteh
F
,
Tipps
A
,
Datnow
B
,
Reliability of Her2/neu, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor testing by immunohistochemistry on cell block of FNA and serous effusions from patients with primary and metastatic breast carcinoma
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2011 May
;
39
(
5
):
328
32
. .
12.
Kumar
SK
,
Gupta
N
,
Rajwanshi
A
,
Joshi
K
,
Singh
G
.
Immunochemistry for oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 on cell blocks in primary breast carcinoma
.
Cytopathology
.
2012 Jun
;
23
(
3
):
181
6
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.