Background: The diagnosis of atypical cases in the effusion cytology sample often poses a challenge to the cytologists. Aims and Objectives: We evaluated the diagnostic role of MOC31 in the metastatic adenocarcinoma in effusion fluid. Materials and Methods: The cytological examination and MOC31 immunostaining in the cell block sections were carried out in 64 cases of serous effusion. A total of 23 cases showed atypical cytology, out of which suspicious for malignancy (SFM) and atypia of undetermined significance (AUS) were 19 and 4 cases, respectively. In these cases, we also performed calretinin immunostaining. The cytological features, results of MOC31 immunostaining, and follow-up data were correlated to find out the sensitivity and specificity of MOC31 immunostaining in the diagnosis of metastatic adenocarcinoma. Result: The sensitivity and specificity of MOC31 were 100%. MOC31 detected all the cases of metastatic adenocarcinoma. MOC31 showed strong positivity in 19 cases of SFM. All these cases had a malignant outcome in histopathology or follow-up data. In AUS cases, MOC31 immunostaining was negative with a benign outcome. In all the atypical but malignant cases calretinin stain showed diffuse cytoplasmic and nuclear positivity. In contrast, MOC31 showed strong membranous positivity and occasionally cytoplasmic positivity. Conclusion: MOC31 is an excellent marker of metastatic adenocarcinoma in the serous effusion. The membranous positivity of MOC31 and negative calretinin immuno-staining are helpful in atypical cytological cases to avoid the diagnostic dilemma. The MOC31 positivity is significantly useful in discrete atypical cells which are more challenging to recognize.

1.
Mohanty
SK
,
Dey
P
.
Serous effusions: diagnosis of malignancy beyond cytomorphology – an analytic review
.
Postgrad Med J
.
2003
;
79
(
936
):
569
74
.
2.
Lobo
C
,
Costa
J
,
Petronilho
S
,
Monteiro
P
,
Leça
L
,
Schmitt
F
.
Cytohistological correlation in serous effusions using the newly proposed International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology: Experience of an oncological center
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2020 Apr 27
. .
3.
Farahani
SJ
,
Baloch
Z
.
Are we ready to develop a tiered scheme for the effusion cytology? A comprehensive review and analysis of the literature
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2019
;
47
(
11
):
1145
59
. .
4.
Chandra
A
,
Crothers
B
,
Kurtycz
D
,
Schmitt
F
.
Announcement: the international system for reporting serous fluid cytopathology
.
Acta Cytol
.
2019
;
63
(
5
):
349
51
. .
5.
Lozano
MD
,
Panizo
A
,
Toledo
GR
,
Sola
JJ
,
Pardo-Mindán
J
.
Immunocytochemistry in the differential diagnosis of serous effusions: a comparative evaluation of eight monoclonal antibodies in papanicolaou stained smears
.
Cancer
.
2001
;
93
(
1
):
68
72
. .
6.
Dejmek
A
,
Hjerpe
A
.
The combination of CEA, EMA, and BerEp4 and hyaluronan analysis specifically identifies 79% of all histologically verified mesotheliomas causing an effusion
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2005
;
32
(
3
):
160
6
. .
7.
Ruitenbeek
T
,
Gouw
AS
,
Poppema
S
.
Immunocytology of body cavity fluids. MOC-31, a monoclonal antibody discriminating between mesothelial and epithelial cells
.
Arch Pathol Lab Med
.
1994
;
118
(
3
):
265
9
.
8.
Kundu
UR
,
Krishnamurthy
S
.
Use of the monoclonal antibody MOC-31 as an immunomarker for detecting metastatic adenocarcinoma in effusion cytology
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2011
;
119
(
4
):
272
8
. .
9.
Hecht
JL
,
Pinkus
JL
,
Pinkus
GS
.
Monoclonal antibody MOC-31 reactivity as a marker for adenocarcinoma in cytologic preparations
.
Cancer
.
2006
;
108
(
1
):
56
9
. .
10.
Went
PT
,
Lugli
A
,
Meier
S
,
Bundi
M
,
Mirlacher
M
,
Sauter
G
, et al.
Frequent EpCam protein expression in human carcinomas
.
Hum Pathol
.
2004
;
35
(
1
):
122
8
. .
11.
Li
D
,
Wang
B
,
Hu
Q
,
Shen
Y
,
Xu
D
,
Wang
T
,
et al
.
Diagnostic accuracy of MOC-31 for malignant effusions: a meta-analysis
.
Tumour Biol
.
2014
;
35
(
6
):
6003
9
. .
12.
Kuenen-Boumeester
V
,
van Loenen
P
,
de Bruijn
EM
,
Henzen-Logmans
SC
.
Quality control of immunocytochemical staining of effusions using a standardized method of cell processing
.
Acta Cytol
.
1996
;
40
(
3
):
475
9
. .
13.
Delahaye
M
,
van der Ham
F
,
van der Kwast
TH
.
Complementary value of five carcinoma markers for the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma, adenocarcinoma metastasis, and reactive mesothelium in serous effusions
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
1997
;
17
(
2
):
115
20
. .
14.
Hyun
TS
,
Barnes
M
,
Tabatabai
ZL
.
The diagnostic utility of D2-40, calretinin, CK5/6, desmin and MOC-31 in the differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in pleural effusion cytology
.
Acta Cytol
.
2012
;
56
(
5
):
527
32
. .
15.
Saleh
HA
,
El-Fakharany
M
,
Makki
H
,
Kadhim
A
,
Masood
S
.
Differentiating reactive mesothelial cells from metastatic adenocarcinoma in serous effusions: the utility of immunocytochemical panel in the differential diagnosis
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2009
;
37
(
5
):
324
32
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.