Introduction: Nowadays, endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA), and fine needle biopsy (FNB) are considered the best procedures for the diagnosis of biliopancreatic lesions. These methods represent a milestone since they proved to be both safe for the patient and useful to achieve diagnostic material useful to plan the best treatment strategy. Objective: Since in the literature, a debate between cytology and histology supporters is still ongoing and the trend is changing in favor of FNB, we would like to present our experience about the diagnostic yield of FNA and FNB. The aim of our study is to highlight FNA versus FNB diagnostic role of biliopancreatic lesions, highlight advantages, and drawbacks of these procedures, and our view on these 2 procedures and whether they should still be considered complementary or opposing techniques. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed our hospital series of 469 EUS diagnostics procedures of biliopancreatic lesions performed in 419 patients, between 2015 and 2019. Results: The overall adequacy rates of FNA and FNB were, respectively, 98.9 and 100%. Stratifying cases according to anatomic location of the mass (pancreas vs. biliary system), we detected 168 malignancies out of 349 pancreatic lesions (168/349; 48.1%), while biliary system cases positive for malignancy represented 33.8% (23/68 cases) (p value = 0.045, χ2 test). As for concomitant FNB, our series displayed a high rate of diagnostic concordance (88.8%). Conclusions: Despite numerous data published, it is still unclear which is the most feasible method to use; therefore, we compared FNA, FNB, or their combination to understand the best applicable technique. Our experience confirmed that FNA is extremely efficient in the diagnosis of biliopancreatic lesions, especially in the hands of expert endoscopists and pathologists. Considering anatomic location, EUS-FNA is more accurate for mass-forming neoplasms in the pancreatic parenchyma rather than for lesions of the biliary system. Moreover, concomitant FNB usually confirmed the cytological diagnosis, allowing a deeper immunohistochemical characterization of the neoplasia. This proves that a “pure” cytology and “pure” histology approach should be looked differently since these are complementary techniques especially if we can obtain a cellblock from FNA.

1.
Rawla
P
,
Sunkara
T
,
Gaduputi
V
.
Epidemiology of pancreatic cancer: global trends, etiology and risk factors
.
World J Oncol
.
2019 Feb
;
10
(
1
):
10
27
.
2.
Owens
DK
,
Owens
DK
,
Davidson
KW
,
Krist
AH
,
Barry
MJ
,
Cabana
M
, et al
Screening for pancreatic cancer: US preventive services task force reaffirmation recommendation statement
.
JAMA
.
2019 Aug 6
;
322
(
5
):
438
44
. .
3.
Orth
M
,
Metzger
P
,
Gerum
S
,
Mayerle
J
,
Schneider
G
,
Belka
C
, et al
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: biological hallmarks, current status, and future perspectives of combined modality treatment approaches
.
Radiat Oncol
.
2019 Aug 8
;
14
(
1
):
141
. .
4.
van Riet
PA
,
Giorgio Arcidiacono
P
,
Petrone
M
,
Quoc Nguyen
N
,
Kitano
M
,
Chang
K
, et al
Combined versus single use 20 G fine-needle biopsy and 25 G fine-needle aspiration for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling of solid gastrointestinal lesions
.
Endoscopy
.
2020 Jan
;
52
(
1
):
37
44
.
Epub 2019 Jul 22
. .
5.
Yan
L
,
Ikemura
K
,
Park
JW
.
Utility of core biopsy with concurrent ROSE FNA in the diagnosis of pancreatic tumor-does the biopsy add any diagnostic benefit?
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2018 Feb
;
46
(
2
):
154
9
. .
6.
Facciorusso
A
,
Martina
M
,
Buccino
RV
,
Nacchiero
MC
,
Muscatiello
N
.
Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions guided by endoscopic ultrasound elastography
.
Ann Gastroenterol
.
2018 Jul–Aug
;
31
(
4
):
513
8
. .
7.
Fernández Aceñero
MJ
,
Vázquez
M
,
Esteban
JM
,
García Diego
G
,
Díaz Del Arco
C
.
Influence of the histopathological features of the lesion on the diagnostic yield of fine-needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic solid lesions
.
Acta Cytol
.
2018
;
62
(
4
):
259
64
.
8.
Wani
S
,
Shah
RJ
.
EUS-guided tissue acquisition: do we need to shoot for a “core” to score?
Gastrointest Endosc
.
2016 Dec
;
84
(
6
):
1047
9
. .
9.
Rodrigues-Pinto
E
,
Jalaj
S
,
Grimm
IS
,
Baron
TH
.
Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study
.
Gastrointest Endosc
.
2016 Dec
;
84
(
6
):
1040
6
. .
10.
Larsen
MH
,
Fristrup
CW
,
Detlefsen
S
,
Mortensen
MB
.
Prospective evaluation of EUS-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic mass lesions
.
Endosc Int Open
.
2018 Feb
;
6
(
2
):
E242
8
. .
11.
Gleeson
FC
,
Levy
MJ
,
Roden
AC
,
Boardman
LA
,
Sinicrope
FA
,
McWilliams
RR
, et al
EUS fine-needle pancreatic core biopsy can determine eligibility for tumor-agnostic immunotherapy
.
Endosc Int Open
.
2018 Oct
;
6
(
10
):
E1278
82
. .
12.
Imaoka
H
,
Sasaki
M
,
Hashimoto
Y
,
Watanabe
K
,
Ikeda
M
.
New era of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: next-generation sequencing by endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling for pancreatic cancer
.
J Clin Med
.
2019 Aug 5
;
8
(
8
):
1173
. .
13.
Hammer
Ø
,
Harper
DAT
,
Ryan
PD
.
PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis
.
Palaeontologia Electronica
.
2001
;
4
(
1
):
art 4
.
14.
Cazacu
IM
,
Luzuriaga Chavez
AA
,
Saftoiu
A
,
Vilmann
P
,
Bhutani
MS
.
A quarter century of EUS-FNA: progress, milestones, and future directions
.
Endosc Ultrasound
.
2018 May–Jun
;
7
(
3
):
141
60
. .
15.
Pitman
MB
,
Centeno
BA
,
Ali
SZ
,
Genevay
M
,
Stelow
E
,
Mino-Kenudson
M
, et al
Standardized terminology and nomenclature for pancreatobiliary cytology: the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology guidelines
.
Cytojournal
.
2014 Jun 2
;
11
(
Suppl 1
):
3
. .
16.
Iglesias-Garcia
J
,
Lariño-Noia
J
,
Abdulkader
I
,
Domínguez-Muñoz
JE
.
Rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic-ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of pancreatic masses
.
World J Gastroenterol
.
2014 Jul 28
;
20
(
28
):
9451
7
. .
17.
Bosman
FT
,
Carneiro
F
,
Hruban
RH
,
Theise
ND
.
WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system
. 4th ed.
Lyon
:
IARC Press
;
2010
.
18.
Lloyd
RV
,
Osamura
RY
,
Klöppel
G
,
Rosai
J
.
WHO classification of tumours of endocrine organs
. 4th ed.
Lyon
:
IARC Press
;
2017
.
19.
The WHO classification of tumours editorial board, digestive system tumours
. 4th ed.
Lyon
:
IARC Press
;
2019
,
20.
Witt
BL
,
Factor
RE
,
Chadwick
BE
,
Caron
J
,
Siddiqui
AA
,
Adler
DG
.
Evaluation of the SharkCore
.
Endosc Ultrasound
.
2018 Sep–Oct
;
7
(
5
):
323
8
. .
21.
Sadaf
S
,
Loya
A
,
Akhtar
N
,
Yusuf
MA
.
Role of endoscopic ultrasound-guided-fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphoma of the pancreas: a clinicopathological study of nine cases
.
Cytopathology
.
2017 Dec
;
28
(
6
):
536
41
. .
22.
Ayres
LR
,
Kmiotek
EK
,
Lam
E
,
Telford
JJ
.
A comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and fine-needle biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions
.
Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol
.
2018 Apr 19
;
2018
:
1415062
. .
23.
Guedes
HG
,
Moura
DTH
,
Duarte
RB
,
Cordero
MAC
,
Santos
MELD
,
Cheng
S
, et al
A comparison of the efficiency of 22G versus 25G needles in EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic mass assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Clinics
.
2018
;
73
:
e261
.
Epub 2018 Feb 15
. .
24.
Sakamoto
H
,
Kitano
M
,
Komaki
T
,
Noda
K
,
Chikugo
T
,
Dote
K
, et al
Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses
.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol
.
2009 Mar
;
24
(
3
):
384
90
. .
25.
Cheng
B
,
Zhang
Y
,
Chen
Q
,
Sun
B
,
Deng
Z
,
Shan
H
, et al
Analysis of fine-needle biopsy vs fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of pancreatic and abdominal masses: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial
.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
.
2018 Aug
;
16
(
8
):
1314
21
.
Epub 2017 Jul 19
. .
26.
van Riet
PA
,
Larghi
A
,
Attili
F
,
Rindi
G
,
Nguyen
NQ
,
Ruszkiewicz
A
, et al
A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device
.
Gastrointest Endosc
.
2019 Feb
;
89
(
2
):
329
39
.
Epub 2018 Oct 24
. .
27.
Bang
JY
,
Kirtane
S
,
Krall
K
,
Navaneethan
U
,
Hasan
M
,
Hawes
R
, et al
In memoriam: fine-needle aspiration, birth: fine-needle biopsy: the changing trend in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition
.
Dig Endosc
.
2019 Mar
;
31
(
2
):
197
202
.
Epub 2018 Dec 2
. .
28.
Tian
L
,
Tang
AL
,
Zhang
L
,
Liu
XW
,
Li
JB
,
Wang
F
, et al
Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study
.
Surg Endosc
.
2018 Aug
;
32
(
8
):
3533
9
.
Epub 2018 Feb 5
. .
29.
Noh
DH
,
Choi
K
,
Gu
S
,
Cho
J
,
Jang
KT
,
Woo
YS
, et al
Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial
.
Scand J Gastroenterol
.
2018 Jan
;
53
(
1
):
94
9
.
Epub 2017 Oct 24
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.