Introduction: Since the late 1970s, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been used for several solid malignancies to identify lymph node metastases. This procedure is associated with less surgical morbidity than complete lymphadenectomy. Recent evidence suggests that axillary lymphadenectomy is not required for breast sentinel nodes with micrometastases (≤2 mm). Current clinical management of sentinel nodes indicates that only macrometastases (>2 mm) should be detected intraoperatively. In Japan, an intraoperative histopathological frozen section (FS) method is used to identify lymph node metastases, but this method takes more than 30 min and requires complex techniques and expensive equipment. Touch imprint cytology (TIC) is an easier, less expensive, and faster method, but its sensitivity has been shown to be low. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine if TIC is more useful than FS in identifying macrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes in preoperative node-negative breast cancer operations. Methods: A prospective review of 49 consecutive patients with node-negative breast cancer treated with SLNB and intraoperative TIC and FS between November 2017 and June 2019 was performed. TIC samples were stained using Papanicolaou and Diff-Quick stains. Results were compared with routine postoperative paraffin sections. Results: With TIC, the Papanicolaou stain took a mean of 12 min, and the Diff-Quick stain took a mean of 10 min. Results of both TIC stain methods were the same. In contrast, the FS method took a mean of 80 min (including the transfer of specimens to a different hospital with the necessary equipment). TIC confirmed macrometastases in 5 cases. All macrometastases were diagnosed equally by the 2 techniques. Both the sensitivity and specificity of TIC were 100% for detection of macrometastases. Conclusion: TIC of SLNB for breast cancer is an easy and useful method for the detection of macrometastases of breast sentinel nodes.

1.
Cabanas
RM
.
An approach for the treatment of penile carcinoma
.
Cancer
.
1977 Feb
;
39
(
2
):
456
66
.
2.
Veronesi
U
,
Paganelli
G
,
Galimberti
V
,
Viale
G
,
Zurrida
S
,
Bedoni
M
, et al
Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes
.
Lancet
.
1997 June
;
349
(
9069
):
1864
7
.
3.
Lyman
GH
,
Temin
S
,
Edge
SB
,
Newman
LA
,
Turner
RR
,
Weaver
DL
, et al
Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2017 Feb
;
32
(
13
):
1365
83
.
4.
Early and local advanced breast cancer: diagnosis and management. NICE Guideline. Published: 18 July 2018. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng101
.
5.
Garcia-Etienne
CA
,
Ferrari
A
,
Della Valle
A
,
Lucioni
M
,
Ferraris
E
,
Di Giulio
G
, et al
Management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel lymph node biopsy: an evidence-based update in a European breast center
.
Eur J Surg Oncol
.
2019 Aug
;
46
(
1
):
15
23
.
6.
Ratanawichitrasin
A
,
Biscotti
CV
,
Levy
L
,
Crowe
JP
.
Touch imprint cytological analysis of sentinel lymph nodes for detecting axillary metastases in patients with breast cancer
.
Br J Surg
.
1999 Oct
;
86
(
10
):
1346
8
.
7.
Nagashima
T
,
Suzuki
M
,
Yagata
H
,
Nikaido
T
,
Horiuchi
F
,
Koda
K
, et al
Intraoperative cytologic diagnosis of sentinel node metastases in breast cancer
.
Acta Cytol
.
2003 Nov-Dec
;
47
(
6
):
1028
32
.
8.
Horváth
Z
,
Paszt
A
,
Simonka
Z
,
Látos
M
,
Oláh
V
,
Nagyszegi
D
, et al
Is intraopetative touch imprint cytology indicated in the surgical treatment of early breast cancers?
Eur J Surg Oncol
.
2017 Jan
;
3
:
1252
7
.
9.
Giuliano
AE
,
Ballman
KV
,
McCall
L
,
Beitsch
PD
,
Brennan
MB
,
Kelemen
PR
, et al
Effect of axillary dissection vs no axillary dissection on 10-year overall survival among women with invasive breast cancer and sentinel node metastasis: the ACOSOG Z0011 (Alliance) randomized clinical trial
.
JAMA
.
2017 Sep
;
318
(
10
):
918
26
.
10.
Lucci
A
,
McCall
LM
,
Beitsch
PD
,
Whitworth
PW
,
Reintgen
DS
,
Blumencranz
PW
, et al
Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) plus axillary lymph node dissection compared with SLND alone in the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trial Z0011
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2007 Aug
;
25
(
24
):
3657
63
.
11.
Yoon
KH
,
Park
S
,
Kim
JY
,
Park
HS
,
Kim
SI
,
Cho
YU
, et al
Is the frozen section examination for sentinel lymph node necessary in early breast cancer patients?
Ann Surg Treat Res
.
2019 Aug
;
97
(
2
):
49
57
.
12.
Sun
L
,
Chen
G
,
Zhou
Y
,
Zhang
L
,
Jin
Z
,
Liu
W
, et al
Clinical significance of MSKCC nomogram on guiding the application of touch imprint cytology and frozen section in intraoperative assessment of breast sentinel lymph nodes
.
Oncotarget
.
2017 Apr
;
8
(
44
):
78105
12
.
13.
Gibbons
CE
,
Quinn
CM
,
Gibbons
D
.
Fine-needle aspiration biopsy management of the axilla in primary breast carcinoma
.
Acta Cytol
.
2019
;
63
(
4
):
314
8
.
14.
Compton
ML
,
Sweeting
RS
,
Reisenbichler
ES
.
Intraoperative sentinel lymph node evaluation: optimizing surgical pathology practices in an era of changing clinical management
.
Ann Diagn Pathol
.
2018 Apr
;
33
:
45
50
.
15.
Pétursson
HI
,
Kovács
A
,
Mattsson
J
,
Olofsson Bagge
R
.
Evaluation of intraoperative touch imprint cytology on axillary sentinel lymph nodes in invasive breast carcinomas, a retrospective study of 1227 patients comparing sensitivity on the different tumor subtypes
.
PLoS One
.
2018 Apr
;
13
(
4
):
e0195560
.
16.
Sai-Giridhar
P
,
Al-Ramadhani
S
,
George
D
,
Gopinath
P
,
Andrews
W
,
Jader
S
, et al
A multicentre validation of Metasin: a molecular assay for the intraoperative assessment of sentinel lymph nodes from breast cancer patients
.
Histopathology
.
2016
;
68
(
6
):
875
87
.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.