Introduction: Liquid-based cytology has become a widely adopted, automated screening system for gynecologic and nongynecologic cytology. Automated screening systems function by distinguishing atypical cells based on their cytoplasmic and nuclear areas, densitometric measurement, and so on. However, the morphological influence of the washing solution has not been fully considered. Here, we examined the morphological effect and temporal change resulting from saving the cytologic samples in various solutions. Methods: Cytologic specimens were obtained from the ascites (AS) of patients with peritoneal cancer. Various solutions of a physiological saline, a Ringer’s solution, a low-molecular dextran L injection, VOLUVEN 6% solution, MIXID L injection (ML), RPMI-1640 medium, and horse serum (HS) were added to aliquot sediments. All samples were refrigerated at 4°C, and aliquots were subsequently processed at specific time points (0, 1, 2, 4, 7, and 14 days). For all samples, cytoplasmic and nuclear size of the Papanicolaou-stained specimens were measured. Results: In terms of cytoplasmic and nuclear areas, samples stored in ML and HS showed no significant difference compared to the AS sample; in contrast, the other samples were significantly larger in both cytoplasmic and nuclear areas than the AS sample. In examining the temporal change among the solutions, we found that the cytoplasms and nuclei became small over the time course for all of the tested solutions. Conclusion: We showed that cells swell in the solution after 1 h of storage and contract as time progresses. Together, our findings have important implications for how mathematical analysis is applied during the automated screening process.

1.
Alves
VA
,
Bibbo
M
,
Schmitt
FC
,
Milanezi
F
,
Longatto Filho
A
.
Comparison of manual and automated methods of liquid-based cytology. A morphologic study
.
Acta Cytol
.
2004
Mar-Apr
;
48
(
2
):
187
93
.
[PubMed]
0001-5547
2.
Wright
PK
,
Marshall
J
,
Desai
M
.
Comparison of SurePath® and ThinPrep® liquid-based cervical cytology using positive predictive value, atypical predictive value and total predictive value as performance indicators
.
Cytopathology
.
2010
Dec
;
21
(
6
):
374
8
.
[PubMed]
0956-5507
3.
Biscotti
CV
,
Dawson
AE
,
Dziura
B
,
Galup
L
,
Darragh
T
,
Rahemtulla
A
, et al
Assisted primary screening using the automated ThinPrep Imaging System
.
Am J Clin Pathol
.
2005
Feb
;
123
(
2
):
281
7
.
[PubMed]
0002-9173
4.
van Hemel
BM
,
Haarsma
JG
,
Ruitenbeek
T
,
Groen
HJ
,
Suurmeijer
AJ
.
Application of the ThinPrep imaging system in urine cytology: a prospective study
.
Cancer Cytopathol
.
2013
Aug
;
121
(
8
):
410
4
.
[PubMed]
1934-662X
5.
Ikenberg
H
.
[Computer-assisted diagnostics in cervical cytology]
.
Pathologe
.
2011
Nov
;
32
(
6
):
476
83
.
[PubMed]
0172-8113
6.
Bibbo
M
,
Wilbur
DC
.
Comprehensive Cytopathology
. 4th ed.
London
:
ESLEVIER
;
2015
.
7.
Ikeda
K
,
Tsuta
K
.
Effusion cytomorphology of small round cell tumors
.
J Cytol
.
2016
Apr-Jun
;
33
(
2
):
85
92
.
[PubMed]
0970-9371
8.
Biro
C
,
Hyne
S
,
Roberts
J
,
Thurloe
J
,
Bowditch
R
.
Liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology
.
Lancet
.
2006
May
;
367
(
9521
):
1481
2
.
[PubMed]
0140-6736
9.
Strander
B
,
Andersson-Ellström
A
,
Milsom
I
,
Rådberg
T
,
Ryd
W
.
Liquid-based cytology versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in an organized screening program : a prospective randomized study
.
Cancer
.
2007
Oct
;
111
(
5
):
285
91
.
[PubMed]
0008-543X
10.
Ronco
G
,
Cuzick
J
,
Pierotti
P
,
Cariaggi
MP
,
Dalla Palma
P
,
Naldoni
C
, et al
Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomised controlled trial
.
BMJ
.
2007
Jul
;
335
(
7609
):
28
.
[PubMed]
0959-8138
11.
Jeong
H
,
Hong
SR
,
Chae
SW
,
Jin
SY
,
Yoon
HK
,
Lee
J
, et al
Comparison unsatisfactory samples from conventional smear versus liquid-based cytology in uterine cervical cancer screening test
.
J Pathol Transl Med
.
2017
May
;
51
(
3
):
314
9
.
[PubMed]
2383-7837
12.
Dadhich
H
,
Toi
PC
,
Siddaraju
N
,
Sevvanthi
K
.
A comparative analysis of conventional cytopreparatory and liquid based cytological techniques (Sure Path) in evaluation of serous effusion fluids
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2016
Nov
;
44
(
11
):
874
9
.
[PubMed]
8755-1039
13.
Yanaki
F
,
Hirai
Y
,
Hanada
A
,
Ishitani
K
,
Matsui
H
.
Liquid-based endometrial cytology using SurePath is not inferior to suction endometrial tissue biopsy in clinical performance for detecting endometrial cancer including atypical endometrial hyperplasia
.
Acta Cytol
.
2017
;
61
(
2
):
133
9
.
[PubMed]
0001-5547
14.
Sadullahoğlu
C
,
Yaman
B
,
Veral
A
,
Nart
D
.
The diagnostic value of cell blocks in Liquid-Based Cytology of bronchial aspiration and bronchial brushing materials
.
Cytopathology
.
2018
Apr
;
29
(
2
):
156
62
.
[PubMed]
0956-5507
15.
Manosca
F
,
Schinstine
M
,
Fetsch
PA
,
Sorbara
L
,
Maria Wilder
A
,
Brosky
K
, et al
Diagnostic effects of prolonged storage on fresh effusion samples
.
Diagn Cytopathol
.
2007
Jan
;
35
(
1
):
6
11
.
[PubMed]
8755-1039
16.
Antonangelo
L
,
Vargas
FS
,
Acencio
MM
,
Cora
AP
,
Teixeira
LR
,
Genofre
EH
, et al
Effect of temperature and storage time on cellular analysis of fresh pleural fluid samples.
Cytopathology Apr;23(2):103–7.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.