Introduction: Pulmonary adenocarcinoma is a major cause of mortality worldwide. The majority of patients present with advanced stage disease, and minimally invasive procedures are desirable for diagnosis and treatment plans. Herein, we report our experience with percutaneous/transthoracic needle aspiration (TT-NA) in the cytologic diagnosis of pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Material and Methods: After institutional review board approval, the cytopathology electronic data system was searched for all consecutive TT-NA of the lung masses from January 2011 to November 2015. Patients’ medical records were reviewed and cytologic materials were evaluated. Results: A total of 151 specimens were identified, with a mean age of 62.8 years; 62.9% of the patients had a prior history of malignancy. Carcinoma/adenocarcinoma was the most common (80%) diagnosis. The targeted lesions were predominantly located in the lung (56.3%, 81/151) and pleural based (27.8%, 42/151). The mean size of the lesions was 3.6 cm. Cytology specimens were adequate in 70.9% of the cases, while 72.8% (110/151) of the cases also had concurrent core biopsy. A malignant diagnosis was rendered in the majority of the cases (64.9%). In 71% of the cases, immunohistochemistry/histochemistry studies were successfully performed. Molecular/genetic studies were requested in 80% of the cases and had adequate material. Complications of the procedure were seen in 9.9% of the patients including pneumothorax (7.9%) and hemoptysis (1.9%). Conclusion: TT-NA is a relatively safe and reliable technique in the assessment of pulmonary lesions.

Keywords:
Lung carcinoma, Transthoracic needle aspiration, Minimally invasive technique, Cytology, Adequacy
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
2019
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.