Background: The implementation of population screening for cervical lesions in rural areas has been particularly challenging for a variety of reasons, including geographic isolation, limited access to medical care, lack of awareness of cancer risks, lower education levels, and embarrassment about having the clinical examination. Methods: This study was designed to evaluate the use of self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in the rural communities served by our hospital. To develop the study group, we trained a local police officer who was already interacting with the rural community to explain cancer risks and the ease of self-sampling to the women. Results: We identified a study group of 386 women, of whom 369 (95.6%) agreed to participate in the study. To test for high-risk HPV, we performed the Cobas PCR test, and of 340 valid samples, 45 (12.2%) were positive for at least 1 of the high-risk HPV subtypes. All positively tested women were referred for colposcopy and Papanicolaou testing. The follow-up biopsies showed that 40% had low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN1), 6.6% had high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2/3), and 4.4% had squamous cell carcinoma. Conclusions: Self-collection for HPV testing by women living in isolated communities is highly efficient and has potential for cost-effective screening by taking advantage of existing support networks, such as the local police service.

Keywords:
Cervical cancer screening, Cervix cancer, Human papillomavirus, Self-sampling, Rural population
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
2019
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.