Objectives: To review the performance and utility of the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) Cytology five category stratification and evaluate the impact of rapid onsite evaluation (ROSE). Method: A retrospective analysis of breast FNAB cytology cases with matched histopathological results at a single institution over a 32 months period using a structured reporting system with 5 diagnostic categories (“inadequate/insufficient,” “benign,” “atypical,” “suspicious of malignancy” and “malignant”) closely paralleling the proposed IAC System. Results: Of 2,696 breast FNAB cases, there were 579 with matched histopathology and 456 of these had ROSE. ROSE decreased the number in the “insufficient” category (17.1% without ROSE to 4.0% with ROSE) and increased the number in the “malignant” (17.9 to 39.0%) with a lesser impact on the “atypical,” “benign” and “suspicious of malignancy” categories. The performance data showed a positive predictive value of 96.4%, negative predictive value of 97.6%, and a risk of malignancy of a FNAB categorized as “insufficient” to be 2.6%, “benign” 1.7%, “atypical” 15.7%, “suspicious of malignancy” 84.6%, and “malignant” 99.5%. Conclusion: Breast FNAB is an accurate test enabling effective diagnosis of breast lesions. ROSE improved the performance by decreasing the proportion of “insufficient” and “atypical” and increasing the “suspicious of malignancy” and “malignant” diagnoses and enabling immediate triage for further biopsy where necessary.

Keywords:
Breast, Fine needle aspiration biopsy, International Academy of Cytology, Yokohama, Reporting system, Risks of malignancy, Rapid onsite evaluation
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
2019
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.