Objective: Regarding cytological findings of squamous dysplasia, a comparison was made between a three-tiered classification – low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL), high-grade SIL/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (HSIL/CIN2), and HSIL/CIN3 – and a two-tiered classification – LSIL and HSIL. The respective risk for CIN2+ and CIN3+ was calculated to make decisions regarding management. Methods: A total of 2,949 women with first-time cytologic findings of squamous dysplasia (LSIL, HSIL/CIN2, or HSIL/CIN3) between January 2013 and June 2016 were enrolled. Subsequent cytological findings and histological diagnoses were evaluated until August 2018. For each category of findings, the risk for CIN2+ and CIN3+ was determined by Kaplan-Meier estimates. The differences in risk between the cytological categories were checked for significance using the log-rank test. Results: For the categories LSIL, HSIL/CIN2, and HSIL/CIN3, the risk for CIN2+ after 12, 24, and 60 months was 3.4, 9.4, and 23.3%; 35.2, 44.8, and 59.8%; and 95.5, 97.8, and 98.9%, respectively. For CIN3+ the risk was 2.0, 5.5, and 13.5%; 28.6, 35.6, and 48.3%; 91.3, 95.6, and 97.9%, respectively. The differences in risk between the categories are highly significant, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: A three-tiered classification of squamous dysplasia such as the Munich Nomenclature III for cytology is suitable for risk-adapted clinical management, especially to avoid overdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Keywords:
Cervical cancer screening, Cervical cytology, Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, Munich Nomenclature, Risk management, The Bethesda System
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.