Objective: The 2014 Bethesda System diagnostic criteria for atypical glandular cells (AGC) aids in classification of atypical cells in cervical cytology. There is limited literature regarding reproducibility and interobserver variability in the application of the 2014 AGC criteria. Our aim is to assess the interobserver variability of AGC with a focus on how diagnostic categories link with guideline-driven management. Study Design: Three observers re-reviewed 51 previously diagnosed AGC Papanicolaou tests. The diagnoses were categorized as follows: (1) according to guideline-specified management, and (2) as glandular vs. squamous lesions. The κ statistic was used to evaluate interobserver agreement. Results: The interobserver variability per guideline management by weighted 2-observer κ ranged from 0.009 to 0.530, with half of the interobserver pairings meeting the threshold for at least fair-moderate agreement. For categorization as glandular, squamous, or both, unweighted κ yielded at best fair interobserver agreement (κ = 0.250) in 1 pairing, with low κ scores in the remainder of reviewer pairs (range 0.015–0.152). Conclusions: There is significant interobserver variability in the diagnosis of AGC. The AGC cases when divided by clinical management had fair-moderate interobserver agreement, suggesting that diagnostic variability likely has a real effect on patient care. This diagnostic uncertainty should be understood by cytologists and clinicians.

Keywords:
Papanicolaou test, Atypical glandular cells, Gynecology, Cytology, Interobserver variability
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.