Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an accurate procedure to sample mediastinal tissue. Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) has been advocated to improve the performance of this procedure, but its benefit remains controversial. Our objective is to assess the utility of ROSE for EBUS-TBNA diagnostic accuracy among unselected patients. Methods: We prospectively collected data from all consecutive EBUS-TBNA procedures performed between 2008 and 2014. ROSE was introduced since 2011 in our daily practice. The accuracy of EBUS-TBNA with and without ROSE was compared in a univariate and multivariate model accounting for confounding factors. The impact of ROSE was then analyzed according to the etiology and size of the lesions. Results: Among 348 EBUS-TBNA procedures analyzed, 213 were performed with ROSE. The overall accuracy tended to be better with ROSE than without (90.6 vs. 84.4%; p = 0.082). After adjustment in a multivariate model, the benefit of ROSE still did not reach statistical significance (adjusted odds ratio 1.86; 95% confidence interval 0.79–4.41). Similar results were obtained in subgroups of patients with malignant disease or sarcoidosis. The size of the lesion did not influence the impact of ROSE on accuracy. Conclusions: ROSE was associated with a moderate increase in the accuracy of EBUS-TBNA, but the difference was not statistically significant. The same effect of ROSE was observed in malignant and nonmalignant lesions and this effect was not influenced by the lesion’s size.

1.
Herth
FJ
,
Eberhardt
R
,
Vilmann
P
,
Krasnik
M
,
Ernst
A
.
Real-time endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes
.
Thorax
.
2006
Sep
;
61
(
9
):
795
8
.
[PubMed]
0040-6376
2.
Vincent
BD
,
El-Bayoumi
E
,
Hoffman
B
,
Doelken
P
,
DeRosimo
J
,
Reed
C
, et al
Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lymph node aspiration
.
Ann Thorac Surg
.
2008
Jan
;
85
(
1
):
224
30
.
[PubMed]
0003-4975
3.
Varela-Lema
L
,
Fernández-Villar
A
,
Ruano-Ravina
A
.
Effectiveness and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-transbronchial needle aspiration: a systematic review
.
Eur Respir J
.
2009
May
;
33
(
5
):
1156
64
.
[PubMed]
0903-1936
4.
Gu
P
,
Zhao
YZ
,
Jiang
LY
,
Zhang
W
,
Xin
Y
,
Han
BH
.
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for staging of lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Eur J Cancer
.
2009
May
;
45
(
8
):
1389
96
.
[PubMed]
0959-8049
5.
Davenport
RD
.
Rapid on-site evaluation of transbronchial aspirates
.
Chest
.
1990
Jul
;
98
(
1
):
59
61
.
[PubMed]
0012-3692
6.
Diette
GB
,
White
P
 Jr
,
Terry
P
,
Jenckes
M
,
Rosenthal
D
,
Rubin
HR
.
Utility of on-site cytopathology assessment for bronchoscopic evaluation of lung masses and adenopathy
.
Chest
.
2000
Apr
;
117
(
4
):
1186
90
.
[PubMed]
0012-3692
7.
Chin
R
 Jr
,
McCain
TW
,
Lucia
MA
,
Cappellari
JO
,
Adair
NE
,
Lovato
JF
, et al
Transbronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing and staging lung cancer: how many aspirates are needed?
Am J Respir Crit Care Med
.
2002
Aug
;
166
(
3
):
377
81
.
[PubMed]
1073-449X
8.
Diacon
AH
,
Schuurmans
MM
,
Theron
J
,
Louw
M
,
Wright
CA
,
Brundyn
K
, et al
Utility of rapid on-site evaluation of transbronchial needle aspirates
.
Respiration
.
2005
Mar-Apr
;
72
(
2
):
182
8
.
[PubMed]
0025-7931
9.
Baram
D
,
Garcia
RB
,
Richman
PS
.
Impact of rapid on-site cytologic evaluation during transbronchial needle aspiration
.
Chest
.
2005
Aug
;
128
(
2
):
869
75
.
[PubMed]
0012-3692
10.
Boyan
W
.
On-site cytopathologic analysis of bronchoscopic needle aspirates. Con: on-site analysis is not indicated
.
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol
.
2003
;
10
:
152
4
.1944-6586
11.
Gasparini
S
.
It is time for this ‘ROSE’ to flower
.
Respiration
.
2005
Mar-Apr
;
72
(
2
):
129
31
.
[PubMed]
0025-7931
12.
Trisolini
R
,
Cancellieri
A
,
Tinelli
C
,
Paioli
D
,
Scudeller
L
,
Casadei
GP
, et al
Rapid on-site evaluation of transbronchial aspirates in the diagnosis of hilar and mediastinal adenopathy: a randomized trial
.
Chest
.
2011
Feb
;
139
(
2
):
395
401
.
[PubMed]
0012-3692
13.
Yarmus
L
,
Van der Kloot
T
,
Lechtzin
N
,
Napier
M
,
Dressel
D
,
Feller-Kopman
D
.
A randomized prospective trial of the utility of rapid on-site evaluation of transbronchial needle aspirate specimens
.
J Bronchology Interv Pulmonol
.
2011
Apr
;
18
(
2
):
121
7
.
[PubMed]
1944-6586
14.
Mondoni
M
,
Carlucci
P
,
Di Marco
F
,
Rossi
S
,
Santus
P
,
D’Adda
A
, et al
Rapid on-site evaluation improves needle aspiration sensitivity in the diagnosis of central lung cancers: a randomized trial
.
Respiration
.
2013
;
86
(
1
):
52
8
.
[PubMed]
1423-0356
15.
Griffin
AC
,
Schwartz
LE
,
Baloch
ZW
.
Utility of on-site evaluation of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens
.
Cytojournal
.
2011
;
8
(
1
):
20
.
[PubMed]
1742-6413
16.
Nakajima
T
,
Yasufuku
K
,
Saegusa
F
,
Fujiwara
T
,
Sakairi
Y
,
Hiroshima
K
, et al
Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for nodal staging in patients with lung cancer
.
Ann Thorac Surg
.
2013
May
;
95
(
5
):
1695
9
.
[PubMed]
0003-4975
17.
Guo
H
,
Liu
S
,
Guo
J
,
Li
B
,
Li
W
,
Lu
Z
, et al
Rapid on-site evaluation during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for the diagnosis of hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy in patients with lung cancer
.
Cancer Lett
.
2016
Feb
;
371
(
2
):
182
6
.
[PubMed]
0304-3835
18.
Oki
M
,
Saka
H
,
Kitagawa
C
,
Kogure
Y
,
Murata
N
,
Adachi
T
, et al
Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing lung cancer: a randomized study
.
Respiration
.
2013
;
85
(
6
):
486
92
.
[PubMed]
1423-0356
19.
Trisolini
R
,
Cancellieri
A
,
Tinelli
C
,
de Biase
D
,
Valentini
I
,
Casadei
G
, et al
Randomized trial of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration with and without rapid on-site evaluation for lung cancer genotyping
.
Chest
.
2015
Dec
;
148
(
6
):
1430
7
.
[PubMed]
0012-3692
20.
van der Heijden
EH
,
Casal
RF
,
Trisolini
R
,
Steinfort
DP
,
Hwangbo
B
,
Nakajima
T
, et al;
World Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology, Task Force on Specimen Guidelines
.
Guideline for the acquisition and preparation of conventional and endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens for the diagnosis and molecular testing of patients with known or suspected lung cancer
.
Respiration
.
2014
;
88
(
6
):
500
17
.
[PubMed]
1423-0356
21.
Joseph
M
,
Jones
T
,
Lutterbie
Y
,
Maygarden
SJ
,
Feins
RH
,
Haithcock
BE
, et al
Rapid on-site pathologic evaluation does not increase the efficacy of endobronchial ultrasonographic biopsy for mediastinal staging
.
Ann Thorac Surg
.
2013
Aug
;
96
(
2
):
403
10
.
[PubMed]
0003-4975
22.
Layfield
LJ
,
Bentz
JS
,
Gopez
EV
.
Immediate on-site interpretation of fine-needle aspiration smears: a cost and compensation analysis
.
Cancer
.
2001
Oct
;
93
(
5
):
319
22
.
[PubMed]
0008-543X
23.
Alsharif
M
,
Andrade
RS
,
Groth
SS
,
Stelow
EB
,
Pambuccian
SE
.
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine-needle aspiration: the University of Minnesota experience, with emphasis on usefulness, adequacy assessment, and diagnostic difficulties
.
Am J Clin Pathol
.
2008
Sep
;
130
(
3
):
434
43
.
[PubMed]
0002-9173
24.
Schmidt
RL
,
Witt
BL
,
Lopez-Calderon
LE
,
Layfield
LJ
.
The influence of rapid onsite evaluation on the adequacy rate of fine-needle aspiration cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Am J Clin Pathol
.
2013
Mar
;
139
(
3
):
300
8
.
[PubMed]
0002-9173
25.
Plit
ML
,
Havryk
AP
,
Hodgson
A
,
James
D
,
Field
A
,
Carbone
S
, et al
Rapid cytological analysis of endobronchial ultrasound-guided aspirates in sarcoidosis
.
Eur Respir J
.
2013
Nov
;
42
(
5
):
1302
8
.
[PubMed]
0903-1936
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.