Objective: The cell block (CB) technique refers to the processing of sediments, blood clots, or grossly visible tissue fragments from cytological specimens into paraffin blocks that can be cut and stained by the same methods used for histopathology. The technique brings additional tissue architectural information. CB can be used for ancillary techniques such as immunocytochemistry and molecular techniques. Study Design: We reviewed the literature on the various preparatory techniques of CBs. Results: There is a wide range of preparatory techniques for CBs and no golden standard for CBs exists: tens of methods are used in various institutions. The majority of the methods are modified in house techniques with a few commercially available kits. The techniques most commonly used are the plasma/thrombin method, the agar method, and commercially available Histogel- and Cellient CB-methods. Dissatisfaction with the cellular yield of the CBs is common. Conclusions: In the CBs, the cytological material is preserved for future use, which is a tremendous advantage in the era of targeted therapy and biobanking. The CB is thus central to the future of cytology: more can be done with less material and with less invasiveness to the patient.

Keywords:
Cell block, Cytology technique, Cytology
1.
Koss LG, Melamed MR: Breast; in Koss LG, Melamed MR (eds): Koss’s Diagnostic Cytology and Its Histopathologic Basis. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2006, pp 1590–1591.
2.
Jain D, Mathur SR, Iyer VK: Cell blocks in cytopathology: a review of preparative methods, utility in diagnosis and role in ancillary studies. Cytopathology 2014; 25: 356–371.
3.
Kalhor N, Wistuba II: Perfecting the fine-needle aspirate cell block. Cancer Cytopathol 2013; 121: 109–110.
4.
Herbert A: Cell blocks are not a substitute for cytology: why pathologists should understand cytopathology particularly in their chosen speciality. Cytopathology 2014; 25: 351–355.
5.
Roy-Chowdhuri S, Stewart J: Preanalytic variables in cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2016; 140: 1191–1199.
6.
Schmitt FC, Vielh P: Expectations and projections for the future of nongynecolgical cytology 10 years ago: did they materialize and how did we do. Acta Cytol 2017; 61: 373–407.
7.
Martins D, Beca F, Schmitt F: Metastatic breast cancer: mechanisms and opportunities for cytology. Cytopathology 2014; 25: 225–230.
8.
Bahrenburg LPH: On the diagnostic results of the microscopical examination of the ascitic fluid in two cases of carcinoma involving the peritoneum. Cleveland Med Gaz 1896; 11: 274–278.
9.
Mandelbaum FS: The diagnosis of malignant tumors by paraffin sections of centrifuged exudates. J Lab Clin Med 1917; 2: 580.
10.
Chapman CB, Whalen EJ: The examination of serous fluids by the cell-block technic. N Engl J Med 1947; 237: 215–220.
11.
Richardson HL, Koss LG, Simon TR: An evaluation of the concomitant use of cytological and histocytological techniques in the recognition of cancer in exfoliated material from various sources. Cancer 1955; 8: 948–950.
12.
Nathan NA, Narayan E, Smith MM, Horn MJ: Cell block cytology. Improved preparation and its efficacy in diagnostic cytology. Am J Clin Pathol 2000; 114: 599–606.
13.
Desai KM, Angadi PV, Kale AD, Hallikerimath S: Modified alcohol-formalin cell block technique in head and neck pathology diagnosis. Acta Cytol 2018; 62: 39–43.
14.
La Fortune KA, Randolph ML, Wu HH, Cramer HM: Improvements in cell block processing: the cell-gel method. Cancer Cytopathol 2017; 125: 267–276.
15.
He QL, Zhu YZ, Zheng GJ, Shi LC Hu SW, Li CT: A new convenient technique for making cell blocks. Cell Tissue Res 2012; 350: 395–400.
16.
Zhao J, Lin DL, Zhai LH, Wang JG: Evaluation of ultrasound-processed rapid cell blocks in the cytopathologic diagnosis of cavity fluids. Acta Cytol 2014; 58: 182–191.
17.
Zito FA, Gadaleta CD, Salvatore C, Filotico R, Labriola A, Marzullo A, Prete F, Marzullo F: A modified cell block technique for fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 1995; 39: 93–99.
18.
Mayall F, Darlington A, Harrison B: Fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of uncommon types of lymphoma. J Clin Pathol 2003; 56: 728–730.
19.
Mayall F, Darlington A: The poor man’s cell block. J Clin Pathol 2010; 63: 837–838.
20.
Krogerus LA, Andersson LC: A simple method for the preparation of paraffin-embedded cell blocks from fine needle aspirates, effusions and brushings. Acta Cytol 1988; 32: 585–587.
21.
Domagala WM, Markiewski M, Tuziak T, Kram A, Weber K, Osborn M: Immunocytochemistry on fine needle aspirates in paraffin miniblocks. Acta Cytol 1990; 34: 291–296.
22.
Varsegi GM, Shidham V: Cell block preparation from cytology specimen with predominance of individually scattered cells. J Vis Exp 2009; 29:e1316.
23.
Mansy SS, Abbas MA, Yehia HA, Abdelrazik SM, Ghanem LY, Amin TM: Value of the innovated technique agarose cell block in improving the sensitivity of urine cytology in cases of bladder carcinoma. Ultrastruct Pathol 2006; 30: 379–385.
24.
Lindsey KG, Houser PM, Shotsberger-Gray W, Chajewski OS, Yang J: Young investigator challenge: a novel, simple method for cell block preparation, implementation, and use over 2 years. Cancer Cytopathol 2016; 124: 885–892.
25.
Noda Y, Fujita N, Kobayashi G, Itoh K, Horaguchi J, Takasawa O, Obana T, Koshita S, Kanno Y, Suzuki T, Hirasawa D, Sugawara T, Ohira T, Harada Y, Tsuchiya T, Sawai T, Uzuki M, Kurose A: Diagnostic efficacy of the cell block method in comparison with smear cytology of tissue samples obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 868–875.
26.
Kaneko C, Kobayashi TK, Hasegawa K, Udagawa Y, Iwai M: A cell-block preparation using glucomannan extracted from Amorphophallus konjac. Diagn Cytopathol 2010; 38: 652–656.
27.
Bussolati G: A celloidin bag for the histological preparation of cytologic material. J Clin Pathol 1982; 35: 574–576.
28.
Fahey C, Bedrosian UK: Collodion bag: a cell block technique for enhanced cell collection. Lab Med 1993; 74: 94–96.
29.
Balassanian R, Wool GD, Ono JC, Olejnik-Nave J, Mah MM, Sweeney BJ, Liberman H, Ljung BM, Pitman MB: A superior method for cell block preparation for fine-needle aspiration biopsies. Cancer Cytopathol 2016; 124: 508–518.
30.
Yung RC, Otell S, Illei P, Clark DP, Feller-Kopman D, Yarmus L, Askin F, Gabrielson E, Li QK: Improvement of cellularity on cell block preparations using the so-called tissue coagulum clot method during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine-needle aspiration. Cancer Cytopathol 2012; 120: 185–195.
31.
Birge RF, McMullen T, Davis SK: A rapid method for paraffin section study of exfoliated neoplastic cells in bodily fluids. Am J Clin Pathol 1948; 18: 754.
32.
De Girolami E: Applications of plasma-thrombin cell block in diagnostic cytology. Part 1: female genital and urinary tracts. Pathol Annu 1977; 12: 251–275.
33.
De Girolami E: Application of plasma-thrombin cell block in diagnostic cytology. Part 2: digestive and respiratory tracts, breasts and effusions. Pathol Annu 1977; 12: 91–110.
34.
Crapanzano JP, Heymann JJ, Monaco S, Nassar A, Saqi A: The state of cell block variation and satisfaction in the era of molecular diagnostics and personalized medicine. Cytojournal 2014; 11: 7.
35.
Yang GC, Wan LS, Papellas J, Waisman J: Compact cell blocks. Use for body fluids, fine needle aspirations and endometrial brush biopsies. Acta Cytol 1998; 42: 703–706.
36.
Karnauchow PN, Bonin RE: “Cell-block” technique for fine needle aspiration biopsy. J Clin Pathol 1982; 35: 688.
37.
Kulkarni MB, Desai SB, Ajit D, Chinoy RF: Utility of the thromboplastin-plasma cell-block technique for fine-needle aspiration and serous effusions. Diagn Cytopathol 2009; 37: 86–90.
38.
Bhatia P, Dey P, Uppal R, Shifa R, Srinivasan R, Nijhawan R: Cell blocks from scraping of cytology smear: comparison with conventional cell block. Acta Cytol 2008; 52: 329–333.
39.
Kulkarni MB, Prabhudesai NM, Desai SB, Borges AM: Scrape cell-block technique for fine needle aspiration cytology smears. Cytopathology 2000; 11: 179–184.
40.
Shi Y, Chiaffarano J, Yee-Chang M, Brandler TC, Elgert P, Leung A, Wei XJ, Cangiarella J, Simsir A, Sun W: Self-clotting method improves cell block preparation. Cancer Cytopathol 2018; 126: 190–199.
41.
Skov BG, Skov T: Paired comparison of PD-L1 expression on cytologic and histologic specimens from malignancies in the lung assessed with PD-L1 IHC 28-8pharmDx and PD-L1 IHC 22C3pharmDx. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2017; 25: 453–459.
42.
Henwood AF, Charlton A: Extraneous epithelial cells from thromboplastin in cell blocks. Cytopathology 2014; 25: 412–421.
43.
Khan S, Omar T, Michelow P: Effectiveness of the cell block technique in diagnostic cytopathology. J Cytol 2012; 29: 177–182.
44.
Rekhtman N, Buonocore DJ, Rudomina D, Friedlander M, Dsouza C, Aggarwal G, Arcila M, Edelweiss M, Lin O: Novel modification of histoGel-based cell block preparation method: improved sufficiency for molecular studies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018; 142: 529–535.
45.
Fischer AH, Vartanian H, Hanc BJ, Scott MP, Eaton DM, Fischer NC, Woda BA: Efficient technique for making paraffin-embedded “rapid cell blocks” in 12 minutes. Mod Pathol 2006; 19: 57.
46.
Diaz-Rosario LA, Kabawat SE: Cell block preparation by inverted filter sedimentation is useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance in ThinPrep specimens. Cancer Cytopathol 2000; 90: 265–272.
47.
Hecht SA, McCormack M: Comparison of three cell block techniques for detection of low frequency abnormal cells. Pathol Lab Med Int 2013; 5: 1–7.
48.
Prendeville S, Brosnan T, Browne TJ, -McCarthy J: Automated Cellient(TM) cytoblocks: better, stronger, faster? Cytopathology 2014; 25: 372–380.
49.
Kruger AM, Stevens MW, Kerley KJ, Carter CD: Comparison of the Cellient(TM) automated cell block system and agar cell block method. Cytopathology 2014; 25: 381–388.
50.
Xing W, Hou AY, Fischer A, Owens CL, Jiang Z: The Cellient automated cell block system is useful in the differential diagnosis of atypical glandular cells in Papanicolaou tests. Cancer Cytopathol 2014; 122: 8–14.
51.
van Hemel BM, Suurmeijer AJ: Effective application of the methanol-based preservCyt(TM) fixative and the Cellient automated cell block processor to diagnostic cytopathology, immunocytochemistry, and molecular biology. Diagn Cytopathol 2013; 41: 734–741.
52.
Gorman BK, Kosarac O, Chakraborty S, Schwartz MR, Mody DR: Comparison of breast carcinoma prognostic/predictive biomarkers on cell blocks obtained by various methods: Cellient, formalin and thrombin. Acta Cytologica 2012; 56: 289–296.
53.
Baloch ZW, Lee A, Cobbs C, Roberts S, LiVolsi VA, Gupta PK: Millipore filter cell block preparation: an alternative to cell block in nongynecologic specimens of limited cellularity. Diagn Cytopathol 1999; 20: 389–392.
54.
Smedts F, Schrik M, Horn T, Hopman AH: Diagnostic value of processing cytologic aspirates of renal tumors in agar cell (tissue) blocks. Acta Cytol 2010; 54: 587–594.
55.
Kerstens HM, Robben JC, Poddighe PJ, Melchers WJ, Boonstra H, de Wilde PC, Macville MV, Hanselaar AG: AgarCyto: a novel cell-processing method for multiple molecular diagnostic analyses of the uterine cervix. J Histochem Cytochem 2000; 48: 709–718.
56.
Kubik MJ, Bovbel A, Goli H, Saremian J, Siddiqi A, Masood S: Diagnostic value and accuracy of imprint cytology evaluation during image-guided core needle biopsies: review of our experience at a large academic center. Diagn Cytopathol 2015; 43: 773–779.
57.
Collins BT, Garcia TC, Hudson JB: Effective clinical practices for improved FNA biopsy cell block outcomes. Cancer Cytopathol 2015; 123: 540–547.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.