Objectives: We sought to assess the utility and limitations of both flow cytometry (FC) and cytology for the analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in a practical clinical setting. Methods: A total of 393 consecutive CSF samples from 171 patients submitted for both cytomorphologic and FC assessments were analyzed. Results: Both FC and cytology findings were negative for malignancy in 315/393 samples (80%), and either positive (POS) or suspicious/atypical (SUSP/AT) in 7% of samples. This resulted in high agreement between FC and cytology (87%). Minor discrepancies were present in 4% of the cases. In 28 samples, an abnormal population was detected by FC but not by cytology. Conclusions: FC and cytology are important complementary methods for analyzing CSF samples. In cases where cytology is SUSP/AT and FC is inconclusive or negative, additional specimens should be submitted for immunostaining, cytogenetics, and/or molecular studies.

Glantz MJ, Cole BF, Glantz LK, et al: Cerebrospinal fluid cytology in patients with cancer: minimizing false-negative results. Cancer 1998; 82: 733–739.
Glass JP, Melamed M, Chernik NL, Posner JB: Malignant cells in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF): the meaning of a positive CSF cytology. Neurology 1979; 29: 1369–1375.
Schiff D, Feske SK, Wen PY: Deceptively normal ventricular fluid in lymphomatous meningitis. Arch Intern Med 1993; 153: 389–390.
Wasserstrom WR, Glass JP, Posner JB: Diagnosis and treatment of leptomeningeal metastases from solid tumors: experience with 90 patients. Cancer 1982; 49: 759–772.
Bromberg JE, Breems DA, Kraan J, et al: CSF flow cytometry greatly improves diagnostic accuracy in CNS hematologic malignancies. Neurology 2007; 68: 1674–1679.
Craig FE, Ohori NP, Gorrill TS, Swerdlow SH: Flow cytometric immunophenotyping of cerebrospinal fluid specimens. Am J Clin Pathol 2011; 135: 22–34.
Di Noto R, Scalia G, Abate G, et al: Critical role of multidimensional flow cytometry in detecting occult leptomeningeal disease in newly diagnosed aggressive B-cell lymphomas. Leuk Res 2008; 32: 1196–1199.
Finn WG, Peterson LC, James C, Goolsby CL: Enhanced detection of malignant lymphoma in cerebrospinal fluid by multiparameter flow cytometry. Am J Clin Pathol 1998; 110: 341–346.
French CA, Dorfman DM, Shaheen G, Cibas ES: Diagnosing lymphoproliferative disorders involving the cerebrospinal fluid: increased sensitivity using flow cytometric analysis. Diagn Cytopathol 2000; 23: 369–374.
Hegde U, Filie A, Little RF, et al: High incidence of occult leptomeningeal disease detected by flow cytometry in newly diagnosed aggressive B-cell lymphomas at risk for central nervous system involvement: the role of flow cytometry versus cytology. Blood 2005; 105: 496–502.
Nuckel H, Novotny JR, Noppeney R, Savidou I, Duhrsen U: Detection of malignant haematopoietic cells in the cerebrospinal fluid by conventional cytology and flow cytometry. Clin Lab Haematol 2006; 28: 22–29.
Quijano S, Lopez A, Manuel Sancho J, et al: Identification of leptomeningeal disease in aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: improved sensitivity of flow cytometry. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 1462–1469.
Roma AA, Garcia A, Avagnina A, Rescia C, Elsner B: Lymphoid and myeloid neoplasms involving cerebrospinal fluid: comparison of morphologic examination and immunophenotyping by flow cytometry. Diagn Cytopathol 2002; 27: 271–275.
Schinstine M, Filie AC, Wilson W, Stetler-Stevenson M, Abati A: Detection of malignant hematopoietic cells in cerebral spinal fluid previously diagnosed as atypical or suspicious. Cancer 2006; 108: 157–162.
Urbanits S, Griesmacher A, Hopfinger G, et al: FACS analysis – a new and accurate tool in the diagnosis of lymphoma in the cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Chim Acta 2002; 317: 101–107.
Ahluwalia MS, Wallace PK, Peereboom DM: Flow cytometry as a diagnostic tool in lymphomatous or leukemic meningitis: ready for prime time? Cancer 2012; 118: 1747–1753.
Langerak AW, Groenen PJ, Bruggemann M, et al: EuroClonality/BIOMED-2 guidelines for interpretation and reporting of Ig/TCR clonality testing in suspected lymphoproliferations. Leukemia 2012; 26: 2159–2171.
Armitage JO, Weisenburger DD: New approach to classifying non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: clinical features of the major histologic subtypes. Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Classification Project. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 2780–2795.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.