Objective: Oral cancer accounts for almost 40% of all cancers in the Indian subcontinent. Techniques like oral scrape cytology are helpful in early diagnosis of premalignant lesion and thus prevention of malignant transformation. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of cytotechnologists in assessing the adequacy and preliminary diagnostic accuracy of oral brush liquid-based cytology. Study Design: 110 oral brush liquid-based cytology smears were prospectively screened by a cytotechnologist for adequacy assessment, and a preliminary diagnosis was recorded. Smears were subsequently studied by the reporting cytopathologist for the final diagnosis. The performance of the cytotechnologist in the assessment of adequacy and the preliminary diagnosis were compared with the final interpretation rendered by the cytopathologist. Results: There was no significant difference in adequacy assessment between both observers, and good concordance was observed in the identification of frankly malignant lesions; however, in premalignant cases, complete agreement in all the cases was not observed. Maximum numbers of discrepant cases were seen in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, 4/17 were downgraded to low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and 2/17 to negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy, respectively. Conclusion: Trained cytotechnologists are capable of assessing the adequacy and identifying the malignancy in oral brush liquid-based cytology smears, and hence there is potential for them to perform initial screening of such cases.

Keywords:
Liquid-based cytology, Oral cytology, Oral cancer, Erythroplakia, Leukoplakia
1.
Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O’Connor D, Prey M, et al: The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA 2002; 287: 2114–2119.
2.
Cibas ES, Dean B, Maffeo N, Allred EN: Quality assurance in gynaecologic cytology. The value of cytotechnologist-cytopathologist discrepancy logs. Am J Clin Pathol 2001; 115: 512–516.
3.
Neville BW, Day TA: Oral cancer and precancerous lesions. CA Cancer J Clin 2002; 52: 195–215.
4.
Montgomery PW, von Haam E: A study of exfoliative cytology in patients with carcinoma of the oral mucosa. J Dent Res 1951; 30: 308–313.
5.
Driemel O, Kunkel M, Hullmann M, von Eqqeling F, Muller-Richter U, Kosmehl H, et al: Diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma and its precursor lesions. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2007; 5: 1095–1100.
6.
Boon ME, Alons-van Kordelaar JJM, Rietveld-Scheffers PEM: Consequences of the introduction of combined spatula and cytobrush sampling for cervical cytology improvements in smear quality and detection rates. Acta Cytol 1986; 30: 264–270.
7.
Mehrotra R, Singh MK, Pandya S, Singh M: The use of an oral brush biopsy without computer-assisted analysis in the evaluation of oral lesions: a study of 94 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 246–253.
8.
Mehrotra R, Gupta A, Singh M, Ibrahim R: Application of cytology and molecular biology in diagnosing premalignant or malignant oral lesions. Mol Cancer 2006; 5: 11.
9.
Sciubba JJ: Improving detection of precancerous and cancerous oral lesions. Computer-assisted analysis of the oral brush biopsy. U.S. Collaborative OralCDx Study Group. J Am Dent Assoc 1999; 130: 1445–1457.
10.
Scher RL, Oostingh PE, Levine PA, Cantrell RW, Feldman PS: Role of fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of lesions of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and nasopharynx. Cancer 1988; 62: 2602–2606.
11.
Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D (eds): WHO Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon, IARC Press, 2005.
12.
Kaugars GE, Silverman S Jr, Ray AK, Page DG, Abbey LM, Burns JC, et al: The use of exfoliative cytology for the early diagnosis of oral cancers: is there a role for it in education and private practice? J Cancer Educ 1998; 13: 85–89.
13.
Olson MT, Novak A, Kirby J, Shahid H, Boonyaarunnate T, Ali SZ: Cytotechnologist-attended on-site evaluation of adequacy for metastatic disease involving bone and soft tissue. Acta Cytol 2013; 57: 550–556.
14.
Olson MT, Tatsas AD, Ali SZ: Cytotechnologist-attended on-site adequacy evaluation of thyroid fine-needle aspiration: comparison with cytopathologists and correlation with the final interpretation. Am J Clin Pathol 2012; 138: 90–95.
15.
Estrange PL, Bevenius J, Williams L: Brisbane, Australia, Huddinge. Intra-oral application of microcolpohysteroscopy: a new technique for clinical examination of oral tissues at high magnification. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 67: 282–285.
16.
Shah SS, Senapati S, Klacsmann F, Miller DL, Johnson JJ, Chang HC, et al: Current technologies and recent developments for screening of HPV-associated cervical and oropharyngeal cancers. Cancers 2016; 8: 85.
17.
Ogden GR, Cowpe JG: Quantitative cyto-photometric analysis of an aid to the detection of recurrent oral cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989; 27: 224–228.
18.
Kreimer AR, Clifford GM, Boyle P, Franceschi S: Human papillomavirus types in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas worldwide: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005; 14: 467–475.
19.
Ang KK, Harris J, Wheeler R, Weber R, Rosenthal DI, NguyenTan PF, et al: Human papillomavirus and survival of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 24–35.
20.
Marur S, D’Souza G, Westra WH, Forastiere AA: HPV-associated head and neck cancer: a virus-related cancer epidemic. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 781–789.
21.
Näsman A, Attner P, Hammarstedt L, Du J, Eriksson M, Giraud G, et al: Incidence of human papillomavirus (HPV) positive tonsillar carcinoma in Stockholm, Sweden: an epidemic of viral-induced carcinoma? Int J Cancer 2009; 125: 362–366.
22.
Lindquist D, Romanitan M, Hammarstedt L, Nasman A, Dahlstrand H, Lindholm J, et al: Human papillomavirus is a favourable prognostic factor in tonsillar cancer and its oncogenic role is supported by the expression of E6 and E7. Mol Oncol 2007; 1: 350–355.
23.
Speight PM: Update on oral epithelial dysplasia and progression to cancer. Head Neck Pathol 2007; 1: 61–66.
24.
Sadiq H, Gupta P, Singh N, Thakar SS, Prabhakar I, Thakral J: Various grading systems of the oral epithelial dysplasia: a review. Int J Adv Health Sci 2015; 1: 20–26.
25.
Abbey LM, Kaugers GE, Gunsolley JC, Burns JC, Page DG, Svirsky JA, et al: Intraexaminer and interexaminer reliability in the diagnosis of oral epithelial dysplasia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995; 80: 188–191.
26.
Brothwell DJ, Lewis DW, Bradley G, Leong I, Jordan RC, Mock D, et al: Observer agreement in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003; 31: 300–305.
27.
Kuyama K, Matsumoto T, Morikawa M, Fukatsu A, Ichimura M, Wakami M, et al: Morphometrical findings among dysplasias of oral, cervical and bronchial regions. OJST 2013; 3: 215–222.
28.
Warnakulasuriya S: Global epidemiology of oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol 2009; 45: 309–316.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.