Objectives: Cell block preparation is a recognized technique in histopathological diagnosis. This technique aids in maintaining an intact architecture and reducing the diagnostic errors associated with fine-needle aspiration cytology. Numerous techniques have been put forth, but the need for an optimal technique for routine use in the laboratory still persists. The aim of our study was to establish a cell block technique which aids in the accurate diagnosis of head and neck pathology. Methodology: A modified cell block technique was developed using alcohol-formalin as a fixative. Forty fine-needle aspiration fluids from clinically and radiologically diagnosed cases of head and neck pathology were used as samples. The cell block sections were compared with the cytology smears to determine the utility of the technique. Results: The cell blocks presented with better preservation of the architectural framework and enabled a quick diagnosis. Cellular clumping was negligible, and nuclear as well as cellular details were maintained similar to tissue sections. It led to the integration of conventional techniques using 10% neutral buffered formalin with that of the 10% alcohol-formalin technique. Conclusion: Modified cell block technique can be used as a simple and effective tool in the routine diagnosis of head and neck pathology.

Keywords:
Modified alcohol-formalin, Cell block, Fine-needle aspiration, Head and neck pathology
1.
Koss LG (ed): Scope and sampling techniques in diagnostic cytology; in Diagnostic Cytology and Its Histopathologic Bases, vol 1, ed 4. Philadelphia, J.B. Lippincott, pp 1-9.
2.
Moschetta M, Telegrafo M, Carluccio DA, Jablonska JP, Rella L, Serio G, Carroza M, Stabile Ianora AA, Angelelli G: Comparison between fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and core needle biopsy (CNB) in the diagnosis of breast lesions. G Chir 2014;35:171-176.
3.
Orell SR: Pitfalls in fine needle aspiration cytology. Cytopathology 2003;14:173-182.
4.
Nathan N, Narayan E, Smith M, Horn M: Improved preparation and its efficacy in diagnostic cytology. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;114:599-606.
5.
Shobha SN, Kodandaswamy CR: Utility of modified cell block technique in cases of pleural effusion suspected for malignancy. Int J Health Sci Res 2013;3:32-38.
6.
Udasimath S, Arakeril S, Karigowdar M, Telikar B: The role of the cell block method in the diagnosis of malignant ascitic fluid effusions. J Clin Diagn Res 2012;6:1280-1283.
7.
Velios F, Griffin J: Examination of the body fluids for tumor cells. Am J Clin Pathol 1954;24:676-681.
8.
Musso C, Silva-Santos M, Pereira F: Cotton block method: one-step method of cell block preparation after fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 2005;49:22-26.
9.
Zanoni D, Grandi F, Cagnini D, Bosco S, Rocha N: Agarose cell block technique as a complementary method in the diagnosis of fungal osteomyelitis in a dog. Open Vet J 2012;2:19-22.
10.
Dekker A, Bupp PA: The cytology of serous effusions. An investigation into the usefulness of cell blocks versus smears. Am J Clin Pathol 1978;70:855-860.
11.
Kung IT, Yuen RW, Chan JK: Technical notes. The optimal formalin fixation and the processing schedule of the cell blocks from the fine needle aspirates. Pathology 1989;21:143-145.
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
2017
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.