Introduction: False-negative thyroid fine-needle aspirates (FNA) are not well characterized. Methods: We correlated the results of all thyroid aspirations from 1997 to 2016 with histologic follow-up. Results: There were 13,733 aspirates, 2,112 (15.3%) resections, and 678 malignancies (32.1%). Eighteen (2.7%) false-negative cases were identified (interpretation, n = 6; sampling, n = 7; and new nodules, n = 5). Interpretive false-negative cases were significantly less likely when the indeterminate rate was greater than 13% (p = 0.01). Interpretive errors involved rare cells with poorly developed features of malignancy. Sampling errors were not associated with scant cellularity in the specimen. The majority of false-negative cases were not resected because of a clinical suspicion of malignancy. The sensitivity of FNA for 9-mm papillary carcinomas was 44.3%. Conclusion: In this cohort, the false-negative rate of thyroid FNA was 2.7% and the risk of malignancy for a benign diagnosis was 3.5%. Interpretative errors involved rare cells with poorly developed features of malignancy. There is little evidence that either the false-negative rate or the risk of malignancy of a benign thyroid FNA is different in patients who do and do not undergo resection.

Keywords:
Diagnosis, Risk of malignancy, Thyroid, Neoplasia, Resection, Cytology, Fine-needle aspiration
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
2017
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.