Objective: Cytology specimens are considered to be a promising alternative for detecting driver mutations in lung cancer patients. We aimed to explore the suitability and utility of various cytology samples of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients for mutation testing. In addition to mutation detection, the importance of preanalytic factors was discussed. Design: A total of 116 cytology samples including 32 controls comprising pleural effusions, bronchial washings, and direct fine-needle aspiration (FNA) smears were included in the study for the detection of EGFR, KRAS, and Her-2/neu gene mutations. Tumor content was checked by microscopic evaluation. Tumor enrichment was done by scraping direct smears. DNA yield was assessed before selecting the method of mutation detection. Sanger sequencing and real-time PCR-based methods were used. Results: Overall, 20.23% EGFR mutations and 2.74% KRAS mutations were observed in this study. Nondriver genetic polymorphisms were observed in EGFR exon 20 in 37% cases. The coexistence of the EGFR mutation and EGFR polymorphism was seen in 7 cases. DNA yield was better in pleural effusions and bronchial washings. Real-time PCR was used in specimens of low DNA yield. Conclusions: Cytology samples are useful in ascertaining molecular diagnostic information for treatment purposes if they are optimized judiciously in their preanalytic phase.

Keywords:
Pleural effusions, Molecular testing, Lung adenocarcinoma, Bronchial washing, Fine-needle aspiration smears
1.
Wong SQ, Li J, Tan AY, Vedururu R, Pang JM, Do H, Ellul J, Doig K, Bell A, MacArthur GA, Fox SB, Thomas DM, Fellowes A, Parisot JP, Dobrovic A: CANCER 2015 cohort. Sequence artefacts in a prospective series of formalin-fixed tumours tested for mutations in hotspot regions by massively parallel sequencing. BMC Med Genomics 2014;7:23.
2.
Smouse JH, Cibas ES, Janne PA, Joshi VA, Zou KH, Lindeman NI: EGFR mutations are detected comparably in cytologic and surgical pathology specimens of non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer 2009;117:67-72.
3.
Billah S, Stewart J, Staerkel G, Chen S, Gong Y, Guo M: EGFR and KRAS mutations in lung carcinoma: molecular testing by using cytology specimens. Cancer Cytopathol 2011;119:111-117.
4.
Rekhtman N, Brandt SM, Sigel CS, Friedlander MA, Riely GJ, Travis WD, Zakowski MF, Moreira AL: Suitability of thoracic cytology for new therapeutic paradigms in non-small cell lung carcinoma: high accuracy of tumor subtyping and feasibility of EGFR and KRAS molecular testing. J Thorac Oncol 2011;6:451-458.
5.
Betz BL, Roh MH, Weigelin HC, Placido JB, Schmidt LA, Farmen S, Arenberg DA, Kalemkerian GP, Knoepp SM: The application of molecular diagnostic studies interrogating EGFR and KRAS mutations to stained cytologic smears of lung carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:564-571.
6.
Lozano MD, Zulueta JJ, Echeveste JI, Gúrpide A, Seijo LM, Martín-Algarra S, Del Barrio A, Pio R, Idoate MA, Labiano T, Perez-Gracia JL: Assessment of epidermal growth factor receptor and K-ras mutation status in cytological stained smears of non-small cell lung cancer patients: correlation with clinical outcomes. Oncologist 2011;16:877-885.
7.
Sun PL, Jin Y, Kim H, Lee CT, Jheon S, Chung JH: High concordance of EGFR mutation status between histologic and corresponding cytologic specimens of lung adenocarcinomas. Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:311-319.
8.
Williams C, Ponten F, Moberg C, Söderkvist P, Uhlén M, Pontén J, Sitbon G, Lundeberg J: A high frequency of sequence alterations is due to formalin fixation of archival specimens. Am J Pathol 1999;155:1467-1471.
9.
Dejmek A, Zendehrokh N, Tomaszewska M, Edsjö A: Preparation of DNA from cytological material: effects of fixation, staining, and mounting medium on DNA yield and quality. Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:344-353.
10.
Vallonthaiel AG, Jain D, Madan K, Arava S: Pulmonary adenocarcinoma with signet ring features: detailed cytomorphologic analysis. Diagn Cytopathol 2016;44:607-611.
11.
Jain D, Mathur SR, Guleria R, Iyer VK: Utility and pattern of positivity of p40 in the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung by cytology: the first study on fine needle aspiration smears. Cytopathology 2014;25:330-335.
12.
Vallonthaiel AG, Jain D, Singh V, Kaur K, Madan K, Kumar V, Iyer VK, Sharma MC: c-Myb overexpression in cytology smears of tracheobronchial and pulmonary adenoid cystic carcinomas. Acta Cytol 2017;61:77-83.
13.
Reynolds JP, Tubbs RR, Minca EC, MacNamara S, Almeida FA, Ma PC, Pennell NA, Cicenia JC: EGFR mutational genotyping of liquid based cytology samples obtained via fine needle aspiration (FNA) at endobronchial ultrasound of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Lung Cancer 2014;86:158-63.
14.
Lee SE, Lee SY, Park HK, Oh SY, Kim HJ, Lee KY, Kim WS: Detection of EGFR and KRAS mutation by pyrosequencing analysis in cytologic samples of non-small cell lung cancer. J Korean Med Sci 2016;31:1224-1230.
15.
Allegrini S, Antona J, Mezzapelle R, Miglio U, Paganotti A, Veggiani C, Frattini M, Monga G, Balbo P, Boldorini R: Epidermal growth factor receptor gene analysis with a highly sensitive molecular assay in routine cytologic specimens of lung adenocarcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 2012;138:377-381.
16.
Roy-Chowdhuri S, Goswami RS, Chen H, Patel KP, Routbort MJ, Singh RR, Broaddus RR, Barkoh BA, Manekia J, Yao H, Medeiros LJ, Staerkel G, Luthra R, Stewart J: Factors affecting the success of next-generation sequencing in cytology specimens. Cancer Cytopathol 2015;123:659-668.
17.
da Cunha Santos G, Saieg MA: Preanalytic parameters in epidermal growth factor receptor mutation testing for non-small cell lung carcinoma: a review of cytologic series. Cancer Cytopathol 2015;123:633-643.
18.
Khan S, Omar T, Michelow P: Effectiveness of the cell block technique in diagnostic cytopathology. J Cytol 2012;29:177-182.
19.
Jain D, Mathur SR, Iyer VK: Cell blocks in cytopathology: a review of preparative methods, utility in diagnosis and role in ancillary studies. Cytopathology 2014;25:356-371.
20.
Coley SM, Crapanzano JP, Saqi A: FNA, core biopsy, or both for the diagnosis of lung carcinoma: obtaining sufficient tissue for a specific diagnosis and molecular testing. Cancer Cytopathol 2015;123:318-326.
21.
Lozano MD, Labiano T, Echeveste J, Gurpide A, Martín-Algarra S, Zhang G, Sharma A, Palma JF: Assessment of EGFR and KRAS mutation status from FNAs and core-needle biopsies of non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Cytopathol 2015;123:230-236.
22.
Wang S, Yu B, Ng CC, Mercorella B, Selinger CI, O'Toole SA, Cooper WA: The suitability of small biopsy and cytology specimens for EGFR and other mutation testing in non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2015;4:119-125.
23.
Heymann JJ, Bulman WA, Maxfield RA, Powell CA, Halmos B, Sonett J, Beaubier NT, Crapanzano JP, Mansukhani MM, Saqi A: Molecular testing guidelines for lung adenocarcinoma: utility of cell blocks and concordance between fine-needle aspiration cytology and histology samples. Cytojournal 2014;11:12.
24.
Roy-Chowdhuri S, Chen H, Singh RR, Krishnamurthy S, Patel KP, Routbort MJ, Manekia J, Barkoh BA, Yao H, Sabir S, Broaddus RR, Medeiros LJ, Staerkel G, Stewart J, Luthra R: Concurrent fine needle aspirations and core needle biopsies: a comparative study of substrates for next-generation sequencing in solid organ malignancies. Mod Pathol 2017;30:499-508.
25.
da Cunha Santos G, Schroder M, Zhu JB, Saieg MA, Geddie WR, Boerner SL, McDonald S: Minimizing delays in DNA retrieval: the “freezer method” for glass coverslip removal. Letter to the editor regarding comparative study of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation analysis on cytology smears and surgical pathology specimens from primary and metastatic lung carcinomas. Cancer Cytopathol 2013;121:533.
26.
Navani N, Brown JM, Nankivell M, Woolhouse I, Harrison RN, Jeebun V, Munavvar M, Ng BJ, Rassl DM, Falzon M, Kocjan G, Rintoul RC, Nicholson AG, Janes SM: Suitability of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens for subtyping and genotyping of non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter study of 774 patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012;185):1316-1322.
27.
Shiau CJ, Babwah JP, da Cunha Santos G, Sykes JR, Boerner SL, Geddie WR, Leighl NB, Wei C, Kamel-Reid S, Hwang DM, Tsao MS: Sample features associated with success rates in population-based EGFR mutation testing. J Thorac Oncol 2014;9:947-956.
28.
Dudley JC, Gurda GT, Tseng LH, Anderson DA, Chen G, Taube JM, Gocke CD, Eshleman JR, Lin MT: Tumor cellularity as a quality assurance measure for accurate clinical detection of BRAF mutations in melanoma. Mol Diagn Ther 2014;18:409-418.
29.
Roy-Chowdhuri S, Chow CW, Kane MK, Yao H, Wistuba II, Krishnamurthy S, Stewart J, Staerkel G: Optimizing the DNA yield for molecular analysis from cytologic preparations. Cancer Cytopathol 2016;124:254-260.
30.
Jain D, Iqbal S, Walia R, Malik P, Cyriac S, Mathur SR, Sharma MC, Madan K,Mohan A, Bhalla A, Pathy S, Kumar L, Guleria R: Evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations based on mutation specific immunohistochemistry innon-small cell lung cancer: a preliminary study. Indian J Med Res 2016;143:308-314.
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
2017
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.