Objective: To determine whether there are significant differences between fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumours with regard to selected cytomorphological features. Study Design: A 10-year retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent excision of a fibroadenoma or phyllodes tumour and in whom a preoperative fine-needle aspiration was performed. The following cytological criteria were assessed: number of stromal and epithelial fragments, stromal-to-epithelial ratio, stromal cellularity, stromal borders, stromal atypia, and proportion of background wavy spindled cells. Patient age, tumour laterality, and tumour size were recorded. Results: Fifty fibroadenomas and 17 phyllodes tumours were included. Compared to phyllodes tumours, fibroadenomas had a larger number of epithelial fragments, a smaller number of stromal fragments, and a lower stromal-to-epithelial ratio. The stroma tended to be less cellular and less atypical compared to phyllodes tumours and the background cellular population contained fewer spindled cells. Conclusion: Fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumours differ with regard to various cytological features, aiding in their distinction on fine-needle aspiration biopsy.

Cibas ES, Ducatman BS: Cytology: Diagnostic Principles and Clinical Correlates. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2009, p 233.
Rosen PP: Rosen's Breast Pathology. Philadelphia, Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2009, pp 188-226.
Lakhani SR; International Agency for Research on Cancer; World Health Organization: WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast. Geneva, WHO, 2012, pp 141-147.
Foxcroft LM, Evans EB, Porter AJ: Difficulties in the pre-operative diagnosis of phyllodes tumours of the breast: a study of 84 cases. Breast 2007;16:27-37.
Simi U, Moretti D, Iacconi P, Arganini M, Roncella M, Miccoli P, et al: Fine needle aspiration cytopathology of phyllodes tumor: differential diagnosis with fibroadenoma. Acta Cytol 1988;32:63-66.
Stanley MW, Tani EM, Rutqvist LE, Skoog L: Cystosarcoma phyllodes of the breast: a cytologic and clinicopathologic study of 23 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 1989;5:29-34.
Dusenbery D, Frable WJ: Fine needle aspiration cytology of phyllodes tumor: potential diagnostic pitfalls. Acta Cytol 1992;36:215-221.
Rao CR, Narasimhamurthy NK, Jaganathan K, Mukherjee G, Hazarika D: Cystosarcoma phyllodes:diagnosis by fine needle aspiration cytology. Acta Cytol 1992;36:203-207.
Shimizu K, Masawa N, Yamada T, Okamoto K, Kanda K: Cytologic evaluation of phyllodes tumors as compared to fibroadenomas of the breast. Acta Cytol 1994;38:891-897.
Shabb NS: Phyllodes tumor. Fine needle aspiration cytology of eight cases. Acta Cytol 1997;41:321-326.
Deen SA, McKee GT, Kissin MW: Differential cytologic features of fibroepithelial lesions of the breast. Diagn Cytopathol 1999;20:53-56.
Bhattarai S, Kapila K, Verma K. Phyllodes tumor of the breast: a cytohistologic study of 80 cases. Acta Cytol 2000;44:790-796.
Krishnamurthy S, Ashfaq R, Shin HJ, Sneige N: Distinction of phyllodes tumor from fibroadenoma: a reappraisal of an old problem. Cancer 2000;90:342-349.
Scolyer RA, Mckenzie PR, Achmed D, Soon Lee C: Can phyllodes tumours of the breast be distinguished from fibroadenomas using fine needle aspiration cytology? Pathology 2001;33:437-443.
Veneti S, Manek S: Benign phyllodes tumour vs fibroadenoma: FNA cytological differentiation. Cytopathology 2001;12:321-328.
Jayaram G, Sthaneshwar P: Fine-needle aspiration cytology of phyllodes tumors. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;26:222-227.
Shimizu K, Korematsu M: Phyllodes tumor of the breast: a cytomorphologic approach based on evaluation of epithelial cluster architecture. Acta Cytol 2002;46:332-336.
Bandyopadhyay R, Nag D, Mondal SK, Mukhopadhyay S, Roy S, Sinha SK: Distinction of phyllodes tumor from fibroadenoma: cytologists' perspective. J Cytol 2010;27:59-62.
El Hag IA, Aodah A, Kollur SM, Attallah A, Mohamed AAE, Al-Hussaini H: Cytological clues in the distinction between phyllodes tumor and fibroadenoma. Cancer Cytopathol 2010;118:33-40.
Shabalova IP, Chemeris GJ, Ermilova VD, Rodionova LM, Pavlikova NA, Syrjänen KJ: Phyllodes tumour: cytologic and histologic presentation of 22 cases, and immunohistochemical demonstration of p53. Cytopathology 1997;8:177-187.
Komenaka IK, El-Tamer M, Pile-Spellman E, Hibshoosh H: Core needle biopsy as a diagnostic tool to differentiate phyllodes tumor from fibroadenoma. Arch Surg 2003;138:987-990.
Jacklin RK, Ridgway PF, Ziprin P, Healy V, Hadjiminas D, Darzi A: Optimising preoperative diagnosis in phyllodes tumour of the breast. J Clin Pathol 2006;59:454-459.
Adesoye T, Neuman HB, Wilke LG, Schumacher JR, Steiman J, Greenberg CC: Current trends in the management of phyllodes tumors of the breast. Ann Surg Oncol 2016;23:3199-3205.
Page JE, Williams JE: The radiological features of phylloides tumour of the breast with clinico-pathological correlation. Clin Radiol 1991;44:8-12.
Chao T-C, Lo Y-F, Chen S-C, Chen M-F: Sonographic features of phyllodes tumors of the breast. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2002;20:64-71.
Gatta G, Iaselli F, Parlato V, Di Grezia G, Grassi R, Rotondo A: Differential diagnosis between fibroadenoma, giant fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumour: sonographic features and core needle biopsy. Radiol Med 2011;116:905-918.
Awad FM, Alsaeed M: Can breast MRI differentiate phyllodes breast tumors from fibroadenomas? Med J Cairo Univ 2009;77:231-235.
Parker SJ, Harries SA: Phyllodes tumours. Postgrad Med J 2001;77:428-435.
Rosa M, Mohammadi A, Masood S: The value of fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of palpable breast lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2012;40:26-34.
Smith MJ, Heffron CC, Rothwell JR, Loftus BM, Jeffers M, Geraghty JG: Fine needle aspiration cytology in symptomatic breast lesions: still an important diagnostic modality? Breast J 2012;18:103-110.
Nassar A: Core needle biopsy versus fine needle aspiration biopsy in breast: a historical perspective and opportunities in the modern era. Diagn Cytopathol 2011;39:380-388.
Simsir A, Cangiarella J: Challenging breast lesions: pitfalls and limitations of fine-needle aspiration and the role of core biopsy in specific lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 2012;40:262-272.
Nagar S, Iacco A, Riggs T, Kestenberg W, Keidan R: An analysis of fine needle aspiration versus core needle biopsy in clinically palpable breast lesions: a report on the predictive values and a cost comparison. Am J Surg 2012;204:193-198.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.