Objective: Meningeal carcinomatosis (MC) is a rare complication in breast cancer patients. It is defined as a diffuse or multifocal leptomeningeal metastasis. Study Design: From our institution database, we retrospectively studied 19 patients diagnosed with MC in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in 1997-2015, in order to evaluate tumor prognostic markers, histologic subtypes, and clinical outcome. Results: All patients were female, with a mean age of 53 years (range 36-75 years). The mean interval between diagnosis of breast carcinoma and MC was 28 months (range 6-62 months). The median survival from the time of diagnosis was 2 months (1-51 months). Sixteen cases (84%) were the ductal phenotype, 62% of which were of a high grade (grade 3), and 3 cases (16%) were lobular. Estrogen and progesterone receptors were positive on immunohistochemistry (IHC) in 53 and 33% of patients, respectively. HER2 IHC was positive (3+) in 20% of the cases; all were amplified by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The incidence of MC in triple-negative tumors was 40%. Twelve patients (63%) already had known metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Conclusions: Most cases of MC are high-grade ductal. MC is more common in triple-negative breast cancers. The outcome of these breast cancer patients with MC was poor. There was no survival difference according to age, histologic subtype, grade, or hormonal or HER2 status.

1.
Gauthier H, Guilhaume MN, Bidard FC, Pierga JY, Girre V, Cottu PH, Laurence V, Livartowski A, Mignot L, Diéras V: Survival of breast cancer patients with meningeal carcinomatosis. Ann Oncol 2010;21:2183-2187.
2.
Chamberlain MC: Leptomeningeal metastasis. Semin Neurol 2010;30:236-244.
3.
Boogerd W, Hart AA, van der Sande JJ, Engelsman E: Meningeal carcinomatosis in breast cancer. Prognostic factors and influence of treatment. Cancer 1991;67:1685-1695.
4.
Niwinska A, Rudnicka H, Murawska M: Breast cancer leptomeningeal metastasis: propensity of breast cancer subtypes for leptomeninges and the analysis of factors influencing survival. Med Oncol 2013;30:408.
5.
Niwinska A, Murawska M, Pogoda K: Breast cancer subtypes and response to systemic treatment after whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases. Cancer 2010;116:4238-4247.
6.
Balm M, Hammack J: Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. Presenting features and prognostic factors. Arch Neurol 1996;53:626-632.
7.
de Azevedo CR, Cruz MR, Chinen LT, Peres SV, Peterlevitz MA, de Azevedo Pereira AE, Fanelli MF, Gimenes DL: Meningeal carcinomatosis in breast cancer: prognostic factors and outcome. J Neurooncol 2011;104:565-572.
8.
Maisonneuve P, Disalvatore D, Rotmensz N, Curigliano G, Colleoni M, Dellapasqua S, Pruneri G, Mastropasqua MG, Luini A, Bassi F, Pagani G, Viale G, Goldhirsch A: Proposed new clinicopathological surrogate definitions of luminal A and luminal B (HER2-negative) intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. Breast Cancer Res 2014;16:R65.
9.
Jayson GC, Howell A: Carcinomatous meningitis in solid tumours. Ann Oncol 1996;7:773-786.
10.
Le Rhun E, Zairi F, Baranzelli MC: Primary breast cancer phenotype associated with propensity for leptomeningeal metastases. Eur J Cancer 2010;8:199.
11.
Lee S, Ahn HK, Park YH, Nam DH, Lee JI, Park W, Choi DH, Huh SJ, Park KT, Ahn JS, Im YH: Leptomeningeal metastases from breast cancer: intrinsic subtypes may affect unique clinical manifestations. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011;129:809-817.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.