Objectives: To review our institutional experience and to analyze the clinical decisions made after a cytological diagnosis of atypia of undetermined significance or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS). Study Design: This is a retrospective review of all thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytologies performed in the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid) between 2010 and 2014. Results: One hundred thirty thyroid FNA were categorized as AUS/FLUS (5%). One hundred six (81.5%) patients were women, and the mean age was 59 years. In 61 patients a repeated FNA was performed (46%). Fifty-five nodules were treated surgically (42.3%), with a histopathological diagnosis of nodular hyperplasia in 36 cases (65%), adenoma in 11 (20%), and carcinoma in 8 (14.5%). In the group of nonsurgical patients (n = 75), a repeated FNA was performed in 43 (57.3%) cases. We found no statistically significant association between sex or age and clinical management (p = 0.13 and p = 0.31, respectively). Conclusions: Clinical management after an AUS/FLUS FNA diagnosis is erratic and does not match standardized management protocols. The AUS/FLUS classification has not led to new diagnostic tests in a relevant percentage of patients. The implementation of consensual institutional strategies could lead to better management of these cases.

Keywords:
Atypia of undetermined significance, Follicular lesion of undetermined significance, Clinical management, Bethesda system
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
2016
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.