Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe a method for analysing histological fragments derived from fine- needle aspirate biopsy (FNAB) of salivary gland tumours (SGTs), and to evaluate the use of immunohistochemistry (IHC) on them. Study Design: We reviewed all 509 FNAB pathology reports taken from SGTs at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland, between 1999 and 2009. In 51% of the cases (n = 209) “histo-fragments” had been obtained and 31 had been further analysed by IHC. Of these, 25 (81%) were available for review. We evaluated the benefit of IHC by relating its added value to the preoperative cytological diagnosis and its accuracy compared with the postoperative histological diagnosis. Results: Most of the samples analysed by IHC were assigned a malignant diagnosis, with 12 different types of malignancy represented. IHC was advantageous in 76% of the cases. In the 108 studies using IHC in this series, antibodies to 36 different antigens were used. Conclusion: Analysis of histo-fragments in FNABs using IHC can be valuable in specific differential diagnostics and raises diagnostic accuracy in SGTs.

1.
Eveson J, Auclair P, Gnepp D, El-Naggar A, Ellis G, Simpson R, et al: Tumours of the salivary glands; in Barnes L, Eveson J, Reichart P, Sidransky D (eds): World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon, IARC Press, 2005, pp 209-282.
2.
Alphs HH, Eisele DW, Westra WH: The role of fine needle aspiration in the evaluation of parotid masses. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2006;14:62-66.
3.
Naz S, Hashmi AA, Khurshid A, Faridi N, Edhi MM, Kamal A, et al: Diagnostic role of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in the evaluation of salivary gland swelling: an institutional experience. BMC Res Notes 2015;8:101.
4.
Tryggvason G, Gailey MP, Hulstein SL, Karnell LH, Hoffman HT, Funk GF, et al: Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration and imaging in the preoperative workup of salivary gland mass lesions treated surgically. Laryngoscope 2013;123:158-163.
5.
Mohammed Nur M, Murphy M: Adequacy and accuracy of salivary gland fine needle aspiration cytology. Ir J Med Sci 2016;185:711-716.
6.
Colella G, Cannavale R, Flamminio F, Foschini MP: Fine-needle aspiration cytology of salivary gland lesions: a systematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:2146-2153.
7.
Ellis G, Auclair P: Tumors of the Salivary Glands. Washington, Armed Forces Institue of Pathology, 2008.
8.
Hughes JH, Volk EE, Wilbur DC: Pitfalls in salivary gland fine-needle aspiration cytology: lessons from the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005;129:26-31.
9.
Manosalva R, Panwar A: The diagnostic challenge of salivary gland malignancies. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2016;16:1001-1002.
10.
Limberg B, Hopker WW, Kommerell B: Histologic differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions by ultrasonically guided fine needle biopsy. Gut 1987;28:237-241.
11.
Skoog L, Tani E: Immunocytochemistry: an indispensable technique in routine cytology. Cytopathology 2011;22:215-229.
12.
Nathan NA, Narayan E, Smith MM, Horn MJ: Cell block cytology: improved preparation and its efficacy in diagnostic cytology. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;114:599-606.
13.
Jain D, Mathur SR, Iyer VK: Cell blocks in cytopathology: a review of preparative methods, utility in diagnosis and role in ancillary studies. Cytopathology 2014;25:356-371.
14.
Zhu S, Schuerch C, Hunt J: Review and updates of immunohistochemistry in selected salivary gland and head and neck tumors. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015;139:55-66.
15.
Skalova A, Vanecek T, Sima R, Laco J, Weinreb I, Perez-Ordonez B, et al: Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of salivary glands, containing the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene: a hitherto undescribed salivary gland tumor entity. Am J Surg Pathol 2010;34:599-608.
16.
Simpson RH, Skalova A, Di Palma S, Leivo I: Recent advances in the diagnostic pathology of salivary carcinomas. Virchows Arch 2014;465:371-384.
17.
Zhang X, Li Q, Yu Y, Yao L, Xu M, Zhang Y, et al: Diagnostic efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided needle sampling for upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2016;30:2431-2441.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.