Background: The clinical diagnosis of hepatobiliary-related actinomycosis can be challenging owing to its rarity and variable presentation. Moreover, actinomycotic pseudotumors may mimic malignancy and result in unnecessary surgical resection. Herein, we present the clinical and cytopathological features of 3 cases with hepatobiliary-related actinomycosis. Cases: The first patient was a 73-year-old man who presented with an exophytic liver lesion. The second patient was a 78-year-old woman who presented with a biliary stricture. The third patient was an 88-year-old woman with a right flank mass extending to the liver. The aspirate smears in these 3 cases demonstrated ‘cotton ball' clusters of filamentous microorganisms and abscesses. The cell blocks of 2 of the patients showed sulfur granules with peripheral filamentous microorganisms positive with a Gram stain but negative with an acid fast stain, consistent with Actinomyces species. All patients were elderly and shared a past surgical history of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Conclusion: These cases demonstrate the complementary role of cytology in the diagnosis of hepatobiliary actinomycosis. A cytologic diagnosis of actinomycosis is minimally invasive and quick. It can prompt proper culture medium selection and avoid unnecessary or extensive surgery. Based on our experience, laparoscopic cholecystectomy may be a precipitating factor for the subsequent development of hepatobiliary-related actinomycosis.

Keywords:
Cytopathology, Fine-needle aspiration, Brushing, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Liver, Bile duct, Actinomycosis, Actinomyces
1.
Bennhoff DF: Actinomycosis: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations and a review of 32 cases. Laryngoscope 1984;94:1198-1217.
2.
Valour F, Sénéchal A, Dupieux C, Karsenty J, Lustig S, Breton P, et al: Actinomycosis: etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and management. Infect Drug Resist 2014;7:183-197.
3.
Sharma M, Briski LE, Khatib R: Hepatic actinomycosis: an overview of salient features and outcome of therapy. Scand J Infect Dis 2002;34:386-391.
4.
Hadley DA, Porschen RK, Juler GL: Actinomycosis of the common bile duct presenting as chronic cholecystitis. Surgery 1981;90:117-119.
5.
Thadani A, Chick J, Gollogly H, Galandauer I, Pais S: Actinomycosis of the common bile duct diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration. Gastroenterol Hepatol (NY) 2010;6:725-727.
6.
Kühn H, Fleischer EM: Isolated actinomycosis of the liver and bile ducts following cholecystectomy. Z Gesamte Inn Med 1974;29:343-347.
7.
Benkhraba K, Benkabbou A, El Malki HO, Amahzoune M, Mohsine R, Ifrine L, et al: Digestive actinomycosis: three cases and review. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2006;30:775-778.
8.
Ghannouchi Jaafoura N, Kaabia N, Khalifa M, Ben Jazia I, Hachfi W, et al: Abdominal actinomycosis: four cases. Rev Med Liege 2008;63:733-736.
9.
Wayne MG, Narang R, Chauhdry A, Steele J: Hepatic actinomycosis mimicking an isolated tumor recurrence. World J Surg Oncol 2011;9:70.
10.
Sondag D, Le Meur A, Baumann R, Mathey B, Bader R, Achatz-Hestin F, et al: Hepatobiliary actinomycosis: apropos of 3 cases with pseudocancerous aspects (in French). Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1989;13:508-512.
11.
Vyas JM, Kasmar A, Chang HR, Holden J, Hohmann E: Abdominal abscesses due to actinomycosis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: case reports and review. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:e1-e4.
12.
Stupak D, Cohen S, Kasmin F, Lee Y, Siegel JH: Intra-abdominal actinomycosis 11 years after spilled gallstones at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2007;17:542-544.
13.
Ramia JM, Mansilla A, Villar J, Muffak K, Garrote D, Ferron JA: Retroperitoneal actinomycosis due to dropped gallstones. Surg Endosc 2004;18:345-349.
14.
Noda S, Soybel, DI, Sampson BA, DeCamp MM: Broncholithiasis and thoracoabdominal actinomycosis from dropped gallstones. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:1465-1467.
15.
Kradin RL, Schnadig VJ: Diagnostic Pathology of Infectious Disease. Philadelphia, Saunders Elesvier, 2010, p 32.
16.
Hussein MR: Mucocutaneous Splendore- Hoeppli phenomenon. J Cutan Pathol 2008;35: 979-988.
17.
Gupta C, Singh P, Bedi S, Kapur K: Primary actinomycosis of the breast masquerading as malignancy: diagnosis by fine needle aspiration cytology. Breast Care (Basel) 2012;7:153-154.
18.
Gupta PK, Erozan YS, Frost JK: Actinomycetes and the IUD: an update. Acta Cytol 1978;22:281-282.
19.
Heffner JE: Pleuropulmonary manifestations of actinomycosis and nocardiosis. Semin Respir Infect 1988;3:352-361.
20.
Cintron JR, Del Pino A, Duarte B, Wood D: Abdominal actinomycosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:105-108.
21.
Smego RA, Foglia G: Actinomycosis. Clin Infect Dis 1998;26:1255-1261.
22.
Kim HS, Park NH, Park KA, Kang SB: A case of pelvic actinomycosis with hepatic actinomycotic pseudotumor. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2007;64:95-99.
23.
Martínez-Vázquez MA, Garza-Galindo AA, Barboza-Quintana O, Garza-Guajardo R, Navar-Vizcarra S, Rodríguez-Leal MC, et al: Hepatic actinomycosis; presentation: a case in a diabetic patient (in Spanish). Rev Gastroenterol Mex 2010;75:344-347.
24.
Yamashita H, Fukuchi T, Ito D, Kawamura R, Kurishima A, Fujiyama T, et al: A case of hepatic actinomycosis diagnosed by thin needle aspiration biopsy successfully treated with antibiotics (in Japanese). Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 2007;104:698-702.
25.
Chen LW, Chang LC, Shie SS, Chien RN: Solitary actinomycotic abscesses of liver: report of two cases. Int J Clin Pract 2006;60:104-107.
26.
Longchampt E, Vessières A, Fabre M: How fine needle aspiration biopsy make it possible to avoid extensive surgery. A case of abdominopelvic actinomycosis (in French). Ann Pathol 2000;20:145-149.
27.
Izquierdo Delso MA, Alvarez Díez E, Ris Romeu J, Cadafalch J, De las Heras P: Liver actinomycosis: diagnosis using fine-needle punction-aspiration (in Spanish). Rev Esp Enferm Dig 1990;77:297-300.
28.
Shurbaji MS, Gupta PK, Newman MM: Hepatic actinomycosis diagnosed by fine needle aspiration: a case report. Acta Cytol 1987;31:751-755.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
2016
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.