Objective: To compare the efficacy of conventional cytomorphologic analysis and flow cytometry (FC) in the diagnosis of T-cell lymphoma in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Study Design: We performed a retrospective review of CSF samples from 2002 to 2012 that showed involvement of a T-cell lymphoma, either by cytomorphologic analysis and/or FC. Patients' demographics, clinical history and follow-up were assessed. Results: Thirty-nine CSF samples were identified from 9 patients. A definitive diagnosis of T-cell lymphoma involvement was made by cytomorphologic analysis and FC in 6 (15.4%) and 39 (100.0%) specimens, respectively. In specimens with definitive cytopathologic diagnoses, the cytomorphologic features included increased cellularity, a monotonous lymphoid population and large, atypical lymphoid cells. Considering cytomorphologic features only, 9 specimens demonstrated atypical lymphocytes not fulfilling the criteria for malignancy, and 24 specimens were negative for malignancy. Conclusions: CSF with T-cell lymphoma involvement may yield paucicellular or acellular specimens depending on the volume of the CSF, the time interval between specimen collection and specimen processing and the application of preservative to CSF. The rate of detection of T-cell lymphoma in the CSF by FC is unequivocally higher than by cytomorphologic analysis. Careful attention to clinical history is crucial, as FC testing may be tailored to evaluate for T-cell lymphoproliferative disorders in limited samples.

Keywords:
Cerebrospinal fluid, Cytopathology, Flow cytometry, Leptomeningeal metastases, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, T-cell lymphoma
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.