Objective: We aimed to clarify the influence of ThinPrep preparation, nodule size and guidance mode on the accuracy of thyroid fine-needle aspiration (FNA). Methods: A total of 1,240 thyroid FNAs were reviewed and 489 cases with histological correlations were enrolled in this study. Results: Of the 489 total cases examined, 101 were processed with both ThinPrep and conventional preparation and 388 entirely with ThinPrep. The overall nondiagnostic rate, sensitivity and accuracy of FNA were 2.0, 91.0 and 89.4%, respectively. The cases with a preoperative ultrasound (n = 469) were grouped according to nodule size. The nondiagnostic rate, sensitivity and accuracy of FNA did not differ significantly with nodule size (p1 = 0.339, p2 = 0.179, p3 = 0.119). A total of 101 resections were performed with palpation-guided FNA and 388 were performed with ultrasound-guided FNA. The nondiagnostic rates, sensitivity and accuracy of FNA were similar in these two groups. Conclusions: The ThinPrep technique is a valid method for thyroid FNA and is effective for thyroid nodules ≥0.5 cm. The reliability of FNA results is not reduced with larger nodules. The use of palpation-guided FNA for palpable solid nodules is also effective.

Keywords:
Thyroid, Fine-needle aspiration, Accuracy, Nodule size, Guidance mode
1.
Penín Álvarez M, San Miguel Fraile P, Seoane Cruz I, et al: Needle washing increases the diagnostic yield of fine needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid gland. Endocrinol Nutr 2013;60:115-118.
2.
Saleh H, Bassily N, Hammoud MJ: Utility of a liquid-based, monolayer preparation in the evaluation of thyroid lesions by fine needle aspiration biopsy: comparison with the conventional smear method. Acta Cytol 2009;53:130-136.
3.
Duncan LD, Forrest L, Law WM Jr, et al: Evaluation of thyroid fine-needle aspirations: can ThinPrep be used exclusively to appropriately triage patients having a thyroid nodule? Diagn Cytopathol 2011;39:341-348.
4.
Chang H, Lee E, Lee H, Choi J, Kim A, Kim BH: Comparison of diagnostic values of thyroid aspiration samples using liquid-based preparation and conventional smear: one-year experience in a single institution. APMIS 2013;121:139-145.
5.
Shrestha M, Crothers BA, Burch HB: The impact of thyroid nodule size on the risk of malignancy and accuracy of fine-needle aspiration: a 10-year study from a single institution. Thyroid 2012;22:1251-1256.
6.
McCoy KL, Jabbour N, Ogilvie JB, et al: The incidence of cancer and rate of false-negative cytology in thyroid nodules greater than or equal to 4 cm in size. Surgery 2007;142:837-844.
7.
Porterfield JR Jr, Grant CS, Dean DS, et al: Reliability of benign fine needle aspiration cytology of large thyroid nodules. Surgery 2008;144:963-968.
8.
Cesur M, Corapcioglu D, Bulut S, et al: Comparison of palpation-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy to ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Thyroid 2006;16:555-561.
9.
Carmeci C, Brooke Jeffrey R, McDougall IR, Nowels KW, Weigel RJ: Thyroid ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid masses. Thyroid 1998;8:283-289.
10.
Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, et al: Management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2006;16:109-142.
11.
Ljung BM, Langer J, Mazzaferri EL, et al: Training, credentialing and re-credentialing for the performance of a thyroid FNA: a synopsis of the national cancer institute thyroid fine-needle aspiration state of the science conference. Diagn Cytopathol 2008;36:400-406.
12.
Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA, Asa SL, et al: Diagnostic terminology and morphologic criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions: a synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Diagn Cytopathol 2008;36:425-437.
13.
Sangalli G, Serio G, Zampatti C, et al: Fine needle aspiration cytology of the thyroid: a comparison of 5,469 cytological and final histological diagnoses. Cytopathology 2006;17:245-250.
14.
Renshaw AA: Sensitivity of fine-needle aspiration for papillary carcinoma of the thyroid correlates with tumor size. Diagn Cytopathol 2011;39:471-474.
15.
Kamran SC, Marqusee E, Kim MI, et al: Thyroid nodule size and prediction of cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:564-570.
16.
Albuja-Cruz MB, Goldfarb M, Gondek SS, Allan BJ, Lew JI: Reliability of fine-needle aspiration for thyroid nodules greater than or equal to 4 cm. J Surg Res 2013;181:6-10.
17.
Mazzaferri EL, Sipos J: Should all patients with subcentimeter thyroid nodules undergo fine-needle aspiration biopsy and preoperative neck ultrasonography to define the extent of tumor invasion? Thyroid 2008;18:597-602.
18.
Leenhardt L, Hejblum G, Franc B, et al: Indications and limits of ultrasound-guided cytology in the management of nonpalpable thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:24-28.
19.
Moon HJ, Son E, Kim EK, Yoon JH, Kwak JY: The diagnostic values of ultrasound and ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in subcentimeter-sized thyroid nodules. Ann Surg Oncol 2012;19:52-59.
20.
Kim DW, Jung SJ, In SH, et al: Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules measuring less than 5 mm: effects on specimen adequacy and diagnosis. Acta Cytol 2013;57:38-44.
21.
American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines Taskforce on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer; Cooper DS, Doherty GM, et al: Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid 2009;19:1167-1214.
22.
Afify AM, Liu J, Al-Khafaji BM: Cytologic artifacts and pitfalls of thyroid fine-needle aspiration using ThinPrep: a comparative retrospective review. Cancer 2001;93:179-186.
23.
Cochand-Priollet B, Prat JJ, Polivka M, et al: Thyroid fine needle aspiration: the morphological features on ThinPrep slide preparations. Eighty cases with histological control. Cytopathology 2003;14:343-349.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.