Introduction: The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC) identifies 6 diagnostic categories in which the risk of malignancy increases respectively. The aim of our study was to assess TBSRTC reporting in our hospital and to evaluate its specificity based on cytohistological correlation. Methods: A histological diagnosis was available in 374 (110 males and 264 females) out of 7,809 thyroid aspirates examined at Mubarak Al-Kabeer Hospital, Kuwait, from 2004 to 2012. The aspirates were classified in accordance with TBSRTC. Results: Thyroid aspirates were classified as nondiagnostic (n = 18; 4.8%), benign (n = 114; 30.5%); atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS; n = 59; 15.8%), follicular neoplasm/suspicious for follicular neoplasm (FN/SFN; n = 17; 4.5%), suspicious for malignancy (SM; n = 80; 21.4%), or malignant (n = 86; 23.0%). In 75 of 86 malignant cases, a papillary carcinoma was detected. There were 3 (1.6%) false-positive aspirates and the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value were 91.0, 61.9, 84.2, and 75.3%, respectively. Conclusions: Our results are fairly comparable to those of various previous studies in the SM, AUS/FLUS, and SFN categories. The higher rates observed in the nondiagnostic and benign categories were possibly due to limited guided aspirations and a lack of on-site evaluation for all cases.

Keywords:
Thyroid, Fine-needle aspiration cytology, Bethesda system reporting, Kuwait
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.