Objectives: To improve the diagnostic accuracy of bile smear cytology, we assessed two cell-yielding procedures. Study Design: One hundred and forty-one patients with biliary stricture underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and conventional brush sampling. The cytologist cut the brush head off the support wire, centrifuged it directly in tissue culture medium for 1 min at 3,000 rpm, centrifuged the medium again and then smeared the cell pellet onto slides. The remaining sheath tube was then cut into 12-cm segments, which were centrifuged in a centrifuge tube for 1 min at 3,000 rpm, collected and submitted for cytospin preparation. Results: The final histopathological diagnoses based on surgery, biopsy or clinical progression were evaluated for sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. Using conventional smears alone, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in patients with biliary stricture were 66.1, 80.7 and 68.8%, respectively. For conventional smears, brush washing and sheath tube contents together, the sensitivity improved to 73.9%, specificity to 100% and accuracy to 78.7%. In the patients with bile duct carcinoma, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 87.3, 100 and 90.7%, respectively. Conclusion: Superior diagnostic accuracy was achieved when conventional smear procedures were combined with the two new procedures.

Keywords:
Biliary tract, Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Bile smear cytology, Brushing smear
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.