Objective: It was the aim of this study to assess the utility of the manual liquid-based cytology (LBC) product VitroPrep™ Cytology Processing Kit (ChemQ Bioscience LLC, Research Triangle Park, N.C., USA). Study Design: This is a descriptive pilot study. Women underwent cervical sampling processed by the ThinPrep™ automated LBC system followed by cervical sampling for the VitroPrep manual system. The following criteria were assessed on a scale of 1-5 (1 = unsatisfactory, 2 = borderline, 3 = acceptable, 4 = good, 5 = excellent): monolayer cell adhesion, overall cellularity, background clarity, preservation of cellular morphology, red cell lysis, and elimination of mucus/debris. Cytological diagnosis was compared to results from ThinPrep samples. In addition, VitroPrep samples were taken prior to conization procedures and compared to pathology results. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results: Forty-two of 47 women who underwent dual cytologic sampling had satisfactory samples. All scores were 3-5, with >90% graded 4-5. The VitroPrep diagnosis correlated with the ThinPrep diagnosis in 90% (38/42) of cases. All specimens obtained from 15 women prior to conization were satisfactory and correlated abnormal cytologic findings with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1-3 pathology. Conclusions: The VitroPrep Cytology Processing Kit was able to provide adequate specimens for evaluation and diagnosis. This low-cost processing kit may provide a useful alternative in settings where automated LBC systems may not be feasible.

Keywords:
Cervical cytology, Liquid-based cytology, Cytology in low-resource settings, Pap smears, ThinPrep™, VitroPrep™, PreservPlus, CytoBase
1.
Lee KR, Ashfaq R, Birdsong GG, Corkill ME, McIntosh KM, Inhorn SL: Comparison of conventional Papanicolaou smears and fluid-based, thin-layer system for cervical cancer screening. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:278-284.
2.
Sulik SM, Kroeger K, Schulz JK, Brown JL, Becker LA, Grant WD: Are fluid-based cytologies superior to the conventional Papanicolaou test? A systematic review. J Fam Pract 2001;50:1040-1046.
3.
Bernstein SJ, Sanchez-Ramos L, Ndubisi B: Liquid-based cervical cytologic smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: a metaanalysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2001;185:308-317.
4.
Davey E, Barrat A, Irwig L, et al: Effect of study design and quality on unsatisfactory rates, cytology classifications, and accuracy in liquid-based versus conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review. Lancet 2006;367:122-132.
5.
Davey E, d'Assuncao J, Irwig L, et al: To compare the accuracy of liquid based cytology using the computerised ThinPrep Imager with that of manually read conventional cytology. BMJ 2007;335:31.
6.
Ronco G, Cuzick J, Pierotti P, et al: Accuracy of liquid based cytology versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2007;335:28.
7.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Ervik M, et al: GLOBOCAN 2012 v1.0, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide: IARC CancerBase No. 11. 2013. http://globocan.iarc.fr (accessed January 9, 2014).
8.
Solomon D, Nayar R: The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology, ed 2. New York, Springer Science+Business Media, 2004.
9.
Lee JM, Kelly D, Gravitt PE, et al: Validation of a low-cost, liquid-based screening method for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:965-970.
10.
Maksem JA, Finnemore M, Belsheim BL, et al: Manual method for liquid-based cytology. A demonstration using 1,000 gynecological cytologies collected directly to vial and prepared by a smear-slide technique. Diagn Cytopathol 2001;25:334-338.
11.
Makesem JA, Dhandwada V, Trueblood JE, et al: Testing automated liquid-based cytology samples with a manual liquid-based cytology method using residual cell suspensions from 500 ThinPrep cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2006;34:391-396.
12.
Taube JM, Kamira B, Motevalli M, et al: Human papillomavirus prevalence and cytopathology correlation in young Ugandan women using a liquid-based Pap preparation. Diagn Cytopathol 2010;38:555-563.
13.
Kavatkar AN, Nagwanshi CA, Dabak SM: Study of a manual method of liquid-based cervical cytology. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2008;51:190-194.
14.
Nandini NM, Nandish SM, Pallavi P, et al: Manual liquid based cytology in primary screening for cervical cancer - a cost effective preposition for scarce resource settings. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012;13:3645-3651.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.