Objective: This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of axillary lymph node fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology in breast cancer and correlates it with clinical parameters/outcomes. Study Design: A total of 91 females underwent FNA of axillary lymph nodes at our institution from January 2007 to February 2013. The cases were classified as ‘positive', ‘negative for malignancy' and ‘nondiagnostic'. Results: Forty-six cases (50.5%) had a histologic follow-up (4.4 ± 3.1 months); of these, 22 (47.8%) were true positive, 7 (15.2%) were true negative, 2 (4.3%) were false negative, 5 (11%) were false positive and 10 (21.7%) were nondiagnostic. However, cytological review of all false positive and false negative cases confirmed the presence or absence of tumor, respectively. All false positive cases had undergone preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with no residual tumor present, and a treatment effect identified only histologically. Meanwhile, the 2 false negative cases involved micrometastasis (≤1.5 mm). Thus, if we exclude these false positive cases (complete responders), then the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 91.7, 100, 100 and 77.8%, respectively. All preoperative FNA-positive axillary lymph nodes were spared from sentinel lymph node biopsy except for 3 of 27 (11.1%). Conclusion: We suggest that axillary lymph node FNA is a highly sensitive technique with a low false negative rate (4.3%) and a diagnostic accuracy of 93.5%.

Keywords:
Breast cancer, Metastasis, Preoperative evaluation, Axillary lymph node, Fine needle aspiration cytology
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.