Objective: Thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is the most valuable, cost-effective and accurate method for the evaluation of patients with thyroid nodules. One of its limitations is that up to 20% of results are nondiagnostic or unsatisfactory. The aim of this study was to analyze the number of thyroid FNAC specimens with nondiagnostic results obtained on an outpatient basis and how many of these had to be repeated according to their results. Study Design: This was a retrospective analysis of diagnostic reports of nondiagnostic thyroid FNAC specimens obtained between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2012 which were retrieved by means of a computerized search. The FNAC results and the age and sex of the patients were collected. Results: From a total of 15,292 thyroid FNAC specimens, 6.8% (n = 1,033) corresponded to nondiagnostic cases. Eligible diagnostic reports for analysis included 877 cases (106 were repetitions of previous nondiagnostic FNAC). After an initial nondiagnostic finding for 771 FNAC smears, 29.5% (n = 225) were repeated with the following results: 43.6% insufficient, 49.3% benign, 6.2% follicular neoplasm, 0.4% suspicious for malignancy and 0.4% malignant. Twenty-two patients underwent a second repeated FNAC. Here the findings were: 36.4% insufficient, 59.1% benign, 4.5% follicular neoplasm, 0.0% suspicious for malignancy and 0.0% malignant. Conclusions: There was a low rate of repeated FNAC among the group of nondiagnostic cases. With repeated FNAC, the rate of nondiagnostic cases and the number of results that potentially demand surgery diminish.

Keywords:
Fine-needle aspiration cytology, Thyroid nodules, Nondiagnostic results
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.