Objective: The aim of our study was to identify the diagnostic value of insulin-like growth factor-II mRNA-binding protein 3 (IMP3) in distinguishing metastatic adenocarcinoma cells (MAC) from reactive mesothelial cells (RMC) in effusions. We also investigated the role of IMP3 as a prognostic indicator for patients with malignant effusion. Study Design: A total of 156 cell block specimens, including 116 malignant effusions with MAC and 40 benign effusions with RMC, were subjected to immunocytochemical staining for IMP3. Results: Immunocytochemical studies showed positive staining for IMP3 in 91 of 116 (78.4%) cases of MAC and in 3 of 40 (7.5%) cases of RMC. With regard to distinguishing MAC from RMC, the IMP3 reactivity was found to be 78.4% sensitive and 92.5% specific with a positive predictive value of 96.8% and a negative predictive value of 59.7%. Diffuse IMP3 expression (>25%) in MAC from patients with gastric adenocarcinoma was associated with shorter survival (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Our data suggest that IMP3 is a helpful marker for differentiating MAC from RMC, and that diffuse IMP3 expression is a poor prognostic indicator in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma and malignant effusion.

1.
Koss LG: Koss' Diagnostic Cytology and Its Histopathological Bases, ed 5. Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006, pp 919-948.
2.
Park DS, Hwang KE, Shim H, Kim BR, Choi KH, Park SH, Park SD, Jeong ET, Kim HR: Elevated survivin is associated with a poor response to chemotherapy and reduced survival in lung cancer with malignant pleural effusions. Clin Exp Metastasis 2012;29:83-89.
3.
Pereira TC, Saad RS, Liu Y, Silverman JF: The diagnosis of malignancy in effusion cytology: a pattern recognition approach. Adv Anat Pathol 2006;13:174-184.
4.
Mohanty SK, Dey P: Serous effusions: diagnosis of malignancy beyond cytomorphology: an analytic review. Postgrad Med J 2003;79:569-574.
5.
Patricia AF, Andrea A: Immunocytochemistry in effusion cytology. Cytopathology 2001;93:293-308.
6.
Fetsch PA, Simsir A, Brosky K, Abati A: Comparison of three commonly used cytologic preparations in effusion immunocytochemistry. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;26:61-66.
7.
Saleh HA, El-Fakharany M, Makki H, Kadhim A, Masood S: Differentiating reactive mesothelial cells from metastatic adenocarcinoma in serous effusions: the utility of immunocytochemical panel in the differential diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 2009;37:324-332.
8.
Kim JH, Kim GE, Choi YD, Lee JS, Lee JH, Nam JH, Choi C: Immunocytochemical panel for distinguishing between adenocarcinomas and reactive mesothelial cells in effusion cell blocks. Diagn Cytopathol 2009;37:258-261.
9.
Su XY, Li GD, Liu WP, Xie B, Jiang YH: Cytological differential diagnosis among adenocarcinoma, epithelial mesothelioma, and reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusions by immunocytochemistry. Diagn Cytopathol 2011;39:900-908.
10.
Nielsen J, Christiansen J, Lykke-Andersen J, Johnsen AH, Wewer UM, Nielsen FC: A family of insulin-like growth factor II mRNA-binding proteins represses translation in late development. Mol Cell Biol 1999;19:1262-1270.
11.
Mueller-Pillasch F, Pohl B, Wilda M, Lacher U, Beil M, Wallrapp C, Hameister H, Knöchel W, Adler G, Gress TM: Expression of the highly conserved RNA binding protein KOC in embryogenesis. Mech Dev 1999;88:95-99.
12.
Vikesaa J, Hansen TV, Jønson L, Borup R, Wewer UM, Christiansen J, Nielsen FC: RNA-binding IMPs promote cell adhesion and invadopodia formation. EMBO J 2006;25:1456-1468.
13.
Li C, Rock KL, Woda BA, Jiang Z, Fraire AE, Dresser K: IMP3 is a novel biomarker for adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix: an immunohistochemical study in comparison with p16(INK4a) expression. Mod Pathol 2007;20:242-247.
14.
Li C, Zota V, Woda BA, Rock KL, Fraire AE, Jiang Z, Lu D, Xu B, Dresser K, Lutman CV, Fischer AH: Expression of a novel oncofetal mRNA-binding protein IMP3 in endometrial carcinomas: diagnostic significance and clinicopathologic correlations. Mod Pathol 2007;20:1263-1268.
15.
Li D, Yan D, Tang H, Zhou C, Fan J, Li S, Wang X, Xia J, Huang F, Qiu G, Peng Z: IMP3 is a novel prognostic marker that correlates with colon cancer progression and pathogenesis. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:3499-3506.
16.
Noske A, Faggad A, Wirtz R, Darb-Esfahani S, Sehouli J, Sinn B, Nielsen FC, Weichert W, Buckendahl AC, Röske A, Müller B, Dietel M, Denkert C: IMP3 expression in human ovarian cancer is associated with improved survival. Int J Gynecol Pathol 2009;28:203-210.
17.
Riener MO, Fritzsche FR, Clavien PA, Pestalozzi BC, Probst-Hensch N, Jochum W, Kristiansen G: IMP3 expression in lesions of the biliary tract: a marker for high-grade dysplasia and an independent prognostic factor in bile duct carcinomas. Hum Pathol 2009;40:1377-1383.
18.
Walter O, Prasad M, Lu S, Quinlan RM, Edmiston KL, Khan A: IMP3 is a novel biomarker for triple negative invasive mammary carcinoma associated with a more aggressive phenotype. Hum Pathol 2009;40:1528-1533.
19.
Ikenberg K, Fritzsche FR, Zuerrer-Haerdi U, Hofmann I, Hermanns T, Seifert H, Müntener M, Provenzano M, Sulser T, Behnke S, Gerhardt J, Mortezavi A, Wild P, Hofstädter F, Burger M, Moch H, Kristiansen G: Insulin-like growth factor II mRNA binding protein 3 (IMP3) is overexpressed in prostate cancer and correlates with higher Gleason scores. BMC Cancer 2010;10:341.
20.
Schaeffer DF, Owen DR, Lim HJ, Buczkowski AK, Chung SW, Scudamore CH, Huntsman DG, Ng SS, Owen DA: Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 3 (IGF2BP3) overexpression in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma correlates with poor survival. BMC Cancer 2010;10:59.
21.
Findeis-Hosey JJ, Xu H: Insulin-like growth factor II-messenger RNA-binding protein-3 and lung cancer. Biotech Histochem 2012;87:24-29.
22.
Okada K, Fujiwara Y, Nakamura Y, Takiguchi S, Nakajima K, Miyata H, Yamasaki M, Kurokawa Y, Takahashi T, Mori M, Doki Y: Oncofetal protein, IMP-3, a potential marker for prediction of postoperative peritoneal dissemination in gastric adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2012;105:780-785.
23.
Yantiss RK, Cosar E, Fischer AH: Use of IMP3 in identification of carcinoma in fine needle aspiration biopsies of pancreas. Acta Cytol 2008;52:133-138.
24.
Wachter DL, Schlabrakowski A, Hoegel J, Kristiansen G, Hartmann A, Riener MO: Diagnostic value of immunohistochemical IMP3 expression in core needle biopsies of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 2011;35:873-877.
25.
Hart J, Parab M, Mandich D, Cartun RW, Ligato S: IMP3 immunocytochemical staining increases sensitivity in the routine cytologic evaluation of biliary brush specimens. Diagn Cytopathol 2012;40:321-326.
26.
Hanley KZ, Facik MS, Bourne PA, Yang Q, Spaulding BO, Bonfiglio TA, Xu H: Utility of anti-L523S antibody in the diagnosis of benign and malignant serous effusions. Cancer 2008;114:49-56.
27.
Ikeda K, Tate G, Suzuki T, Kitamura T, Mitsuya T: IMP3/L523S, a novel immunocytochemical marker that distinguishes benign and malignant cells: the expression profiles of IMP3/L523S in effusion cytology. Hum Pathol 2010;41:745-750.
28.
Ikeda K, Tate G, Suzuki T, Kitamura T, Mitsuya T: Diagnostic usefulness of EMA, IMP3, and GLUT-1 for the immunocytochemical distinction of malignant cells from reactive mesothelial cells in effusion cytology using cytospin preparations. Diagn Cytopathol 2011;39:395-401.
29.
Kim JH, Kim YS, Choi YD, Lee JS, Park CS: Utility of napsin A and thyroid transcription factor 1 in differentiating metastatic pulmonary from non-pulmonary adenocarcinoma in pleural effusion. Acta Cytol 2011;55:266-270.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.