Objective: The removal of blood components is necessary to improve the quality of the liquid-based cytology (LBC) preparations. In ThinPrep® (TP) samples a cell suspension in a methanol-based fixative undergoes a vacuum filtration method, whereas in SurePath™ (SP) samples a cell suspension in an ethanol-based fixative is processed through a density gradient centrifugation system prior to gravity deposition of the specimen onto a glass slide. We compared the cyto-architectural features for the cytologic diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma using parallel TP and SP preparations in a previous publication. Study Design: We performed our study on LM8 cells (a cultured osteosarcoma cell line). LM8 cells at a concentration of 1.25 × 103 cell/cm2 were seeded on a 35-mm plate in culture medium, which contained 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 units/ml penicillin, and 100 μ/ml streptomycin in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM), and aliquots of the cell suspension obtained in this way were compared after the addition of a hemolytic agent, i.e. Cytolyt® (CyL). LBC preparations were then obtained on cell suspensions treated with CyL after different time intervals of hemolysis. Results: Treatment with CyL did not alter the cellularity of the preparation, but reduction of the nuclear area and a tendency towards nuclear chromatin condensation with a subsequent higher brightness were found. Because CyL is a 25% methanol-buffered solution, its alcoholic concentration is low; it was our impression that, while its fixative effect was weak, its hemolytic effect was high. Water influx or efflux through the cell membrane is controlled by osmotic pressure changes induced by the buffer solution in the CyL solution. While CyL was not shown to alter the cell shape, nuclear shrinkage was thought to be probably due to the increasing cell dehydration caused by longer exposure intervals to methanol. Conclusion: This study has allowed us to make significant observations on the hemolytic properties of CyL, and on its combined effects with PreservCyt on the cytomorphology of cells suspensions.

1.
Monsonego J, Autillo-Touati A, Bergeron C, Dachez R, Liaras J, Saurel J, Zerat L, Chatelain P, Mottot C: Liquid-based cytology for primary cervical cancer screening: a multi-centre study. Br J Cancer 2001;84:360-366.
2.
Beerman H, van Dorst EB, Kuenen-Boumeester V, Hogendoorn PC: Superior performance of liquid-based versus conventional cytology in a population-based cervical cancer screening program. Gynecol Oncol 2009;112:572-576.
3.
ThinPrep® 5000 Processor Operator's Manual 71723-1201 Rev. 001. Marlborough, Hologic™, 2008.
4.
PrepStain™ Slide Processor Operator's Manual 780-13000-00 Rev. B. Burlington, Becton, Dickinson and Company, 2005.
5.
Belsley NA, Tambouret RH, Misdraji J, Muzikansky A, Russell DK, Wilbur DC: Cytologic features of endocervical glandular lesions: comparison of SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional smear specimen preparations. Diagn Cytopathol 2008;36:232-237.
6.
Norimatsu Y, Sakamoto S, Ohsaki H, Ozaki S, Yokoyama T, Shimizu K, Yanoh K, Akiyama M, Bamba M, Kobayashi TK: Cytologic features of the endometrial adenocarcinoma: comparison of ThinPrep and BD SurePath preparations. Diagn Cytopathol 2013;41:673-681.
7.
Dalton P, MacDonald S, Boerner S: Acetic acid recovery of gynecologic liquid-based samples of apparent low squamous cellularity. Acta Cytol 2006;50:136-140.
8.
Cohen D, Shorie J, Biscotti C: Glacial acetic acid treatment and atypical endocervical glandular cells: an analysis of 92 cases. Am J Clin Pathol 2010;133:799-801.
9.
Sweeney B J, Haq Z, Happel J F, Weinstein B, Schneider D: Comparison of the effectiveness of two liquid-based Papanicolaou systems in the handling of adverse limiting factors, such as excessive blood. Cancer 2006;108:27-31.
10.
Kenyon S, Sweeney BJ, Happel J, Marchilli GE, Weinstein B, Schneider D: Comparison of BD SurePath and ThinPrep Pap systems in the processing of mucus-rich specimens. Cancer 2010;118:244-249.
11.
Grapsa D, Ioakim-Liossi A, Stergiou E, Petrakakou E, Nicolopoulou-Stamati P, Patsouris E, Athanassiadou P: Repeat processing of residual ThinPrep Pap tests: sampling of the vial may not be invariably homogeneous. Acta Cytol 2011;55:213-217.
12.
Alaghehbandan R: Performance of the CellSolutions Glucyte liquid-based cytology in comparison with the ThinPrep and SurePath methods. Acta Cytol 2013;57:189-197.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.