Objective: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is recommended by the World Health Organization as a diagnostic method for breast lesions. The morphological interpretation of liquid-based preparations (LBPs) remains a diagnostic challenge due to considerably altered cytomorphology. The aim of the current study was to compare cytomorphological characteristics of SurePath® (SP)-based LBP and conventional smear (CS) in breast FNACs. Study Design: The study included 77 benign and 60 malignant breast FNACs obtained by both SP and CS, all with tissue confirmation. Cases analyzed with both preparations were reviewed and compared, focusing on 10 cytomorphological features. Results: SP aspirates demonstrated notable cytomorphological alterations. Among them, a prominent three-dimensional configuration of cell clusters and frequent and conspicuous nucleoli were the most prominent characteristics of SP compared with CS. Overall diagnostic performances were comparable but were slightly lower for SP than CS (diagnostic accuracy of two reviewers; 87.6 and 90.5% for SP vs. 91.2 and 92.7% for CS, respectively). Conclusion: Although the reviewer should be aware of distinctive cytomorphological alterations, the SP technique is reliable for the evaluation of breast lesions with the advantage of easy interpretation and a diagnostic accuracy equivalent to CS.

Keywords:
Breast, Cytomorphology, Fine needle aspiration cytology, Liquid-based cytology, SurePath®
1.
Litherland JC, Evans AJ, Wilson AR, Kollias J, Pinder SE, Elston CW, Ellis IO, Yeoman LJ: The impact of core-biopsy on pre-operative diagnosis rate of screen detected breast cancers. Clin Radiol 1996;51:562-565.
2.
Ariga R, Bloom K, Reddy VB, Kluskens L, Francescatti D, Dowlat K, Siziopikou P, Gattuso P: Fine-needle aspiration of clinically suspicious palpable breast masses with histopathologic correlation. Am J Surg 2002;184:410-413.
3.
Berner A, Sauer T: Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast. Ultrastruct Pathol 2011;35:162-167.
4.
Mendoza P, Lacambra M, Tan PH, Tse GM: Fine needle aspiration cytology of the breast: the nonmalignant categories. Patholog Res Int 2011;2011:547580.
5.
Cummings MC, Waters BA, O'Rourke PK: Breast fine needle aspiration cytology: a review of current practice in Australasia. Cytopathology 2011;22:269-275.
6.
Bukhari MH, Arshad M, Jamal S, Niazi S, Bashir S, Bakhshi IM, Shaharyar: Use of fine-needle aspiration in the evaluation of breast lumps. Patholog Res Int 2011;2011:689521.
7.
Ukah CO, Oluwasola OA: The clinical effectiveness of fine needle aspiration biopsy in patients with palpable breast lesions seen at the University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria: a 10-year retrospective study. J Cytol 2011;28:111-113.
8.
Howat AJ: Uniform approach to breast fine needle aspiration biopsy. Acta Cytol 1998;42:440.
9.
Walloch J: Technique and interpretation of breast aspiration cytology. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1989;32:786-799.
10.
Abati A, Simsir A: Breast fine needle aspiration biopsy: prevailing recommendations and contemporary practices. Clin Lab Med 2005;25:631-654, v.
11.
Komatsu K, Nakanishi Y, Seki T, Yoshino A, Fuchinoue F, Amano S, Komatsu A, Sugitani M, Nemoto N: Application of liquid-based preparation to fine needle aspiration cytology in breast cancer. Acta Cytol 2008;52:591-596.
12.
Nasuti JF, Tam D, Gupta PK: Diagnostic value of liquid-based (Thinprep) preparations in nongynecologic cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2001;24:137-141.
13.
Mygdakos N, Nikolaidou S, Tzilivaki A, Tamiolakis D: Liquid based preparation (LBP) cytology versus conventional cytology (CS) in FNA samples from breast, thyroid, salivary glands and soft tissues. Our experience in Crete (Greece). Rom J Morphol Embryol 2009;50:245-250.
14.
Kontzoglou K, Moulakakis KG, Konofaos P, Kyriazi M, Kyroudes A, Karakitsos P: The role of liquid-based cytology in the investigation of breast lesions using fine-needle aspiration: a cytohistopathological evaluation. J Surg Oncol 2005;89:75-78.
15.
Perez-Reyes N, Mulford DK, Rutkowski MA, Logan-Young W, Dawson AE: Breast fine-needle aspiration. A comparison of thin-layer and conventional preparation. Am J Clin Pathol 1994;102:349-353.
16.
Dey P, Luthra UK, George J, Zuhairy F, George SS, Haji BI: Comparison of ThinPrep and conventional preparations on fine needle aspiration cytology material. Acta Cytol 2000;44:46-50.
17.
Layfield LJ, Mooney EE, Glasgow B, Hirschowitz S, Coogan A: What constitutes an adequate smear in fine-needle aspiration cytology of the breast? Cancer 1997;81:16-21.
18.
The uniform approach to breast fine-needle aspiration biopsy. National Cancer Institute Fine-Needle Aspiration of Breast Workshop Subcommittees. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;16:295-311.
19.
Malle D, Valeri RM, Pazaitou-Panajiotou K, Kiziridou A, Vainas I, Destouni C: Use of a thin-layer technique in thyroid fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 2006;50:23-27.
20.
Stamataki M, Anninos D, Brountzos E, Georgoulakis J, Panayiotides J, Christoni Z, Peros G, Karakitsos P: The role of liquid-based cytology in the investigation of thyroid lesions. Cytopathology 2008;19:11-18.
21.
Garbar C, Remmelink M, Mascaux C: Fine needle aspiration cytology of lymph node: experience of 2 university hospitals with conventional smears and liquid-based cytology. Acta Cytol 2008;52:418-423.
22.
Michael CW, McConnel J, Pecott J, Afify AM, Al-Khafaji B: Comparison of ThinPrep and TriPath PREP liquid-based preparations in nongynecologic specimens: a pilot study. Diagn Cytopathol 2001;25:177-184.
23.
Jung CK, Lee A, Jung ES, Choi YJ, Jung SL, Lee KY: Split sample comparison of a liquid-based method and conventional smears in thyroid fine needle aspiration. Acta Cytol 2008;52:313-319.
24.
Benoit JL, Kara R, McGregor SE, Duggan MA: Fibroadenoma of the breast: diagnostic pitfalls of fine-needle aspiration. Diagn Cytopathol 1992;8:643-647, discussion 647-648.
25.
Geisinger KR, Stanley MW, Raab SS, Silverman JF: Breast; in Modern Cytopathology, ed 1. Edinburgh, Chuchill Livingstone, 2003, pp 873-929.
26.
Lee KR, Foster RS, Papillo JL: Fine needle aspiration of the breast. Importance of the aspirator. Acta Cytol 1987;31:281-284.
27.
Eisenberg AJ, Hajdu SI, Wilhelmus J, Melamed MR, Kinne D: Preoperative aspiration cytology of breast tumors. Acta Cytol 1986;30:135-146.
28.
Karimzadeh M, Sauer T: Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in histological grade 1 breast carcinomas: are we good enough? Cytopathology 2008;19:279-286.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.