Objective: The morphological interpretation of liquid-based preparation (LBP) remains a diagnostic challenge due to altered cytomorphology with technical reason. Only a few published accounts of the cytopathological features needed for diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) on an LBP exist. We utilized the SurePath LBP system to evaluate conventional and newly recognized cytomorphologic features on histologically confirmed PTC to identify their potent diagnostic significance compared to benign follicular neoplasm (BFN). Study Design: One-hundred and three cases of PTC and 84 BFNs were collected using preoperative fine needle aspiration biopsies. We evaluated and compared 16 cytomorphologic findings in PTC and BFN using an LBP. Results: Among the conventional criteria, papillary structures, fewer background colloids and macrophages, hobnail patterns (54.4% in PTC vs. 10.7% in BFN; p < 0.001) and swirling architecture (14.6% in PTC vs. 0% in BFN; p < 0.001; positive predictive value 100.0%) were significant diagnostic findings for PTC compared to BFN. The hobnail pattern was shown as a newly recognized strong diagnostic parameter for PTC (odds ratio 50.157, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The identified distinctive cytological criteria may be helpful in cases where conventional criteria for PTC are insufficient. Furthermore, application of these findings, along with classical criteria, may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of PTC by fine needle aspiration biopsy.

Keywords:
Liquid-based cytology, SurePath, Fine needle aspiration, Cytomorphology, Papillary thyroid carcinoma
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.