Objective: Telepathology in cytopathology is becoming more commonly utilized, and newer technologic infrastructures afford the laboratory a variety of options. The options and design of a telepathology system are driven by the clinical needs. This is primarily focused on providing rapid on-site evaluation service for fine needle aspiration. Study Design: The clinical requirements and needs of a system are described. Available tools to design and implement a telepathology system are covered, including methods of image capture, network connectivity and remote viewing options. Results: The primary telepathology method currently used and described involves the delivery via a network connection of a live video image to a remote site which is passively viewed by an internet web-based browser. By utilizing live video information and a voice connection to the on-site location, the remote viewer can collect clinical information and direct their view of the slides. Conclusions: Telepathology systems for use in cytopathology can be designed and implemented with commercially available infrastructure. It is necessary for the laboratory to validate the designed system and adhere to the required regulatory requirements. Telepathology for cytopathology can be reliably utilized by adapting existing technology, and newer advances hold great promise for further applications in the cytopathology laboratory.

Keywords:
Telepathology, Telemedicine, Cytopathology, Rapid on-site evaluation, Fine needle aspiration biopsy
1.
Hudson J, Murray B, Chen A, Collins B, Wang J: Telepathology assisted immediate assessment of EBUS-FNA has equivalent accuracy to cytopathologists on-site examination. Mod Pathol 2013;26:92A.
2.
Tsilalis T, Archondakis S, Meristoudis C, Margari N, Pouliakis A, Skagias L, Panayiotides I, Karakitsos P: Assessment of static telecytological diagnoses' reproducibility in cervical smears prepared by means of liquid-based cytology. Telemed J E Health 2012;18:516-520.
3.
Marotti JD, Johncox V, Ng D, Gonzalez JL, Padmanabhan V: Implementation of telecytology for immediate assessment of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirations compared to conventional on-site evaluation: analysis of 240 consecutive cases. Acta Cytol 2012;56:548-553.
4.
Kumar N, Busarla SV, Sayed S, Kirimi JM, Okiro P, Gakinya SM, Moloo Z, Sohani AR: Telecytology in East Africa: a feasibility study of forty cases using a static imaging system. J Telemed Telecare 2012;18:7-12.
5.
Khurana KK, Rong R, Wang D, Roy A: Dynamic telecytopathology for on-site preliminary diagnosis of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses. J Telemed Telecare 2012;18:253-259.
6.
Khurana KK: Telecytology and its evolving role in cytopathology. Diagn Cytopathol 2012;40:498-502.
7.
Heimann A, Maini G, Hwang S, Shroyer KR, Singh M: Use of telecytology for the immediate assessment of CT guided and endoscopic FNA cytology: diagnostic accuracy, advantages, and pitfalls. Diagn Cytopathol 2012;40:575-581.
8.
Goyal A, Jhala N, Gupta P: TeleCyP (telecytopathology): real-time fine-needle aspiration interpretation. Acta Cytol 2012;56:669-677.
9.
Burlingame OO, Kesse KO, Silverman SG, Cibas ES: On-site adequacy evaluations performed by cytotechnologists: correlation with final interpretations of 5241 image-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies. Cancer Cytopathol 2012;120:177-184.
10.
Wilbur DC: Digital cytology: current state of the art and prospects for the future. Acta Cytol 2011;55:227-238.
11.
Thrall M, Pantanowitz L, Khalbuss W: Telecytology: clinical applications, current challenges, and future benefits. J Pathol Inform 2011;2:51.
12.
Prosch H, Hoffmann E, Bernhardt K, Schalleschak J, Schober E, Rowhani M, Weber M, Mostbeck G: Dynamic telecytologic evaluation of imprint cytology samples from CT-guided lung biopsies: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1922-1927.
13.
Khurana KK, Swati I, Kasturi R, Lambert R, Izquierdo R: Telecytopathology for rapid preliminary diagnosis of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of thyroid nodules. Telemed J E Health 2011;17:763-767.
14.
Khalbuss WE, Pantanowitz L, Parwani AV: Digital imaging in cytopathology. Pathol Res Int 2011;2011:264683.
15.
Kaplan KJ: Telecytopathology for immediate evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens. Cancer Cytopathol 2010;118:115-118.
16.
Giovagnoli MR, Giarnieri E, Carico E, Giansanti D: How do young and senior cytopathologists interact with digital cytology? Ann Ist Super Sanita 2010;46:123-129.
17.
Giansanti D, Cerroni F, Amodeo R, Filoni M, Giovagnoli MR: A pilot study for the integration of cytometry reports in digital cytology telemedicine applications. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2010;46:138-143.
18.
Alsharif M, Carlo-Demovich J, Massey C, Madory JE, Lewin D, Medina AM, Recavarren R, Houser PM, Yang J: Telecytopathology for immediate evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens. Cancer Cytopathol 2010;118:119-126.
19.
Pinco J, Goulart RA, Otis CN, Garb J, Pantanowitz L: Impact of digital image manipulation in cytology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009;133:57-61.
20.
Pantanowitz L, Hornish M, Goulart RA: The impact of digital imaging in the field of cytopathology. Cytojournal 2009;6:6.
21.
Archondakis S, Georgoulakis J, Stamataki M, Anninos D, Skagias L, Panayiotides I, Peros G, Karakitsos P: Telecytology: a tool for quality assessment and improvement in the evaluation of thyroid fine-needle aspiration specimens. Telemed J E Health 2009;15:713-717.
22.
Kerr SE, Bellizzi AM, Stelow EB, Frierson HF Jr, Policarpio-Nicolas ML: Initial assessment of fine-needle aspiration specimens by telepathology: validation for use in pathology resident-faculty consultations. Am J Clin Pathol 2008;130:409-413.
23.
Eichhorn JH, Buckner L, Buckner SB, Beech DP, Harris KA, McClure DJ, Crothers BA, Wilbur DC: Internet-based gynecologic telecytology with remote automated image selection: results of a first-phase developmental trial. Am J Clin Pathol 2008;129:686-696.
24.
Burton K, Chhieng D, Jhala N, Jhala D, Winokur T, Crowe D, Eloubeidi M, Eltoum I: Dynamic telecytopathology has equivalent efficacy with on site rapid cytology diagnosis for pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 2006;108:357-358.
25.
Yamashiro K, Kawamura N, Matsubayashi S, Dota K, Suzuki H, Mizushima H, Wakao F, Azumi N: Telecytology in Hokkaido Island, Japan: results of primary telecytodiagnosis of routine cases. Cytopathology 2004;15:221-227.
26.
Lee ES, Kim IS, Choi JS, Yeom BW, Kim HK, Han JH, Lee MS, Leong AS: Accuracy and reproducibility of telecytology diagnosis of cervical smears. A tool for quality assurance programs. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;119:356-360.
27.
Weinstein RS, Graham AR, Lian F, Braunhut BL, Barker GR, Krupinski EA, Bhattacharyya AK: Reconciliation of diverse telepathology system designs. Historic issues and implications for emerging markets and new applications. APMIS 2012;120:256-275.
28.
Sirintrapun SJ, Cimic A: Dynamic nonrobotic telemicroscopy via skype: a cost effective solution to teleconsultation. J Pathol Inform 2012;3:28.
29.
Gould PV, Saikali S: A comparison of digitized frozen section and smear preparations for intraoperative neurotelepathology. Anal Cell Pathol 2012;35:85-91.
30.
Brachtel E, Yagi Y: Digital imaging in pathology - current applications and challenges. J Biophotonics 2012;5:327-335.
31.
Pantanowitz L, Tuthill J, Balis U: Telepathology; in Pantanowitz L, Tuthill J, Balis U (eds): Pathology Informatics: Theory and Practice. Chicago, American Society for Clinical Pathology Press, 2012, pp 257-272.
32.
Della Mea V: 25 years of telepathology research: a bibliometric analysis. Diagn Pathol 2011;6(suppl 1):S26.
33.
Williams S, Henricks WH, Becich MJ, Toscano M, Carter AB: Telepathology for patient care: what am I getting myself into? Adv Anat Pathol 2010;17:130-149.
34.
Gabril MY, Yousef GM: Informatics for practicing anatomical pathologists: marking a new era in pathology practice. Mod Pathol 2010;23:349-358.
35.
Wilbur DC, Madi K, Colvin RB, Duncan LM, Faquin WC, Ferry JA, Frosch MP, Houser SL, Kradin RL, Lauwers GY, Louis DN, Mark EJ, Mino-Kenudson M, Misdraji J, Nielsen GP, Pitman MB, Rosenberg AE, Smith RN, Sohani AR, Stone JR, Tambouret RH, Wu CL, Young RH, Zembowicz A, Klietmann W: Whole-slide imaging digital pathology as a platform for teleconsultation: a pilot study using paired subspecialist correlations. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009;133:1949-1953.
36.
Weinstein RS, Graham AR, Richter LC, Barker GP, Krupinski EA, Lopez AM, Erps KA, Bhattacharyya AK, Yagi Y, Gilbertson JR: Overview of telepathology, virtual microscopy, and whole slide imaging: prospects for the future. Hum Pathol 2009;40:1057-1069.
37.
Lopez AM, Graham AR, Barker GP, Richter LC, Krupinski EA, Lian F, Grasso LL, Miller A, Kreykes LN, Henderson JT, Bhattacharyya AK, Weinstein RS: Virtual slide telepathology enables an innovative telehealth rapid breast care clinic. Hum Pathol 2009;40:1082-1091.
38.
Leung ST, Kaplan KJ: Medicolegal aspects of telepathology. Hum Pathol 2009;40:1137-1142.
39.
Krupinski EA: Virtual slide telepathology workstation-of-the-future: lessons learned from teleradiology. Semin Diagn Pathol 2009;26:194-205.
40.
Dee FR: Virtual microscopy in pathology education. Hum Pathol 2009;40:1112-1121.
41.
Bellina L, Missoni E: Mobile cell-phones (M-phones) in telemicroscopy: increasing connectivity of isolated laboratories. Diagn Pathol 2009;4:19.
42.
Kumar S, Dunn B: Telecytology: a retrospect and prospect; in Kumar S, Dunn B (eds): Telepathology. Berlin, Springer, 2009, pp 149-162.
43.
Kumar S, Dunn B: Introduction to telepathology; in Kumar S, Dunn B (eds): Telepathology. Berlin, Springer, 2009, pp 1-4.
44.
Telepathology symposium. Hum Pathol 2009;40:1057-1212.
45.
O'Malley DP: Practical applications of telepathology using morphology-based anatomic pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2008;132:743-744.
46.
Mencarelli R, Marcolongo A, Gasparetto A: Organizational model for a telepathology system. Diagn Pathol 2008;3(suppl 1):S7.
47.
Mulford DK: Telepathology education: reaching out to cytopathology programs throughout the country. ASC Bull 2006;43:25-30.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.