Objective: Although Warthin’s tumor (WT) is one of a few salivary gland tumors that have distinct cytologic findings, it can be confused with malignant tumors at times. We assessed the overall accuracy, unusual features, and diagnostic points of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of WT. Study Design: We retrospectively collected histologically confirmed WT from 21 patients and reviewed preoperative FNA slides. Smears were subject to immunocytochemical staining for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and c-kit and compared to metastatic squamous cell carcinoma. Results: All of the cases were in the parotid gland; the mean size was 3.6 ± 1.2 cm. Of 21 patients, 19 were male (age 59.7 ± 9.4 years) and had a history of smoking. The initial FNA diagnoses were WT (11 patients, 52.4%), benign lesion (7 patients, 33.3%), and malignant neoplasm (3 patients, 14.3%). Only 6 patients (28.6%) showed typical FNA features of WT. The dominant cell types in the smears were macrophages (76.2%), squamous-like cells (66.7%), oncocytes (61.9%), and lymphoid cells (57.1%). Some showed atypical degenerated features, a necrotic background, and inflammatory cells, leading to misdiagnosis. CEA positivity and c-kit positivity in WT were noted in 0 and 75.0% of cases, respectively, whereas metastatic squamous cell carcinoma showed positive rates of 16.7 and 0%, respectively. Conclusion: Awareness of potential sources of misdiagnosis together with combination of c-kit/CEA immunostaining may result in an increased diagnostic rate of WT in FNA.

1.
Veder LL, Kerrebijn JD, Smedts FM, den Bakker MA: Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in Warthin tumors. Head Neck 2010;32:1635–1640.
2.
Pilloni L, Bianco P, Difelice E, Cabras S, Castellanos ME, Atzori L, Ferreli C, Mulas P, Nemolato S, Faa G: The usefulness of c-Kit in the immunohistochemical assessment of melanocytic lesions. Eur J Histochem 2011;55:e20.
3.
Terada T: Mutations and protein expression of KIT and PDGFRA genes in ipsilateral testicular seminomas: an immunohistochemical and molecular genetic study. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol 2011;19:450–453.
4.
Teresa P, Grazia ZM, Doriana M, Irene P, Michele S: Malignant effusion of chromophobe renal-cell carcinoma: cytological and immunohistochemical findings. Diagn Cytopathol 2012;40:56–61.
5.
Pan Y, Zhao X, Yang J, Deng J, Zhan Z, Luo Y, Li Q, Guo Y, Zhai Q, Sun B: Absence of gene mutations in KIT-positive carcinoma showing thymus-like elements of the thyroid. Hum Pathol 2012;43:350–355.
6.
Miiji LN, Petrilli AS, Di Cesare S, Odashiro AN, Burnier MN Jr, de Toledo SR, Garcia RJ, Alves MT: C-kit expression in human osteosarcoma and in vitro assays. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2011;4:775–781.
7.
Petersson F, Sima R, Grossmann P, Michal M, Kuroda N, Hora M, Yang X, Kinkor Z, Trivunic S, Zalud R, Sperga M, Jaunmuktane Z, Branzovsky J, Ferda J, Hes O: Renal small cell oncocytoma with pseudorosettes: a histomorphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 10 cases. Hum Pathol 2011;42:1751–1760.
8.
Sukpan K, Settakorn J, Khunamornpong S, Cheewakriangkrai C, Srisomboon J, Siriaunkgul S: Expression of survivin, CD117, and C-erbB-2 in neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2011;21:911–917.
9.
Oba J, Nakahara T, Abe T, Hagihara A, Moroi Y, Furue M: Expression of c-Kit, p-ERK and cyclin D1 in malignant melanoma: an immunohistochemical study and analysis of prognostic value. J Dermatol Sci 2011;62:116–123.
10.
Carvalho JC, Wasco MJ, Kunju LP, Thomas DG, Shah RB: Cluster analysis of immunohistochemical profiles delineates CK7, vimentin, S100A1 and C-kit (CD117) as an optimal panel in the differential diagnosis of renal oncocytoma from its mimics. Histopathology 2011;58:169–179.
11.
Vandenput I, Debiec-Rychter M, Capoen A, Verbist G, Vergote I, Moerman P, Amant F: Kit gene in endometrial carcinoma: an immunohistochemical and mutational analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2011;21:203–205.
12.
Zhang L, Lohse CM, Dao LN, Smyrk TC: Proposed histopathologic grading system derived from a study of KIT and CK19 expression in pancreatic endocrine neoplasm. Hum Pathol 2011;42:324–331.
13.
Shibuya M, Kondo F, Sano K, Takada T, Asano T: Immunohistochemical study of hepatocyte, cholangiocyte and stem cell markers of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011;18:537–543.
14.
Viguer JM, Vicandi B, Jimenez-Heffernan JA, Lopez-Ferrer P, Gonzalez-Peramato P, Castillo C: Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis and management of Warthin’s tumour of the salivary glands. Cytopathology 2010;21:164–169.
15.
Kim JY, Cho H, Rhee BD, Kim HY: Expression of CD44 and cyclin D1 in fine needle aspiration cytology of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Acta Cytol 2002;46:679–683.
16.
Klijanienko J, Vielh P: Fine-needle sampling of salivary gland lesions. 2. Cytology and histology correlation of 71 cases of Warthin’s tumor (adenolymphoma). Diagn Cytopathol 1997;16:221–225.
17.
Parwani AV, Ali SZ: Diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls in fine-needle aspiration interpretation of Warthin tumor. Cancer 2003;99:166–171.
18.
Flezar M, Pogacnik A: Warthin’s tumour: unusual vs. common morphological findings in fine needle aspiration biopsies. Cytopathology 2002;13:232–241.
19.
Verma K, Kapila K: Salivary gland tumors with a prominent oncocytic component: cytologic findings and differential diagnosis of oncocytomas and Warthin’s tumor on fine needle aspirates. Acta Cytol 2003;47:221–226.
20.
Klijanienko J, Vielh P: Fine-needle sampling of salivary gland lesions. 6. Cytological review of 44 cases of primary salivary squamous-cell carcinoma with histological correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 1998;18:174–178.
21.
Maeno S, Kondo F, Sano K, Takada T, Asano T: Morphometric and immunohistochemical study of cholangiolocellular carcinoma: comparison with non-neoplastic cholangiole, interlobular duct and septal duct. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2011.
22.
Xu J, Sasaki M, Harada K, Sato Y, Ikeda H, Kim JH, Yu E, Nakanuma Y: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma arising in chronic advanced liver disease and the cholangiocarcinomatous component of hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma share common phenotypes and cholangiocarcinogenesis. Histopathology 2011;59:1090–1099.
23.
Klijanienko J, Vielh P: Fine-needle sampling of salivary gland lesions. 4. Review of 50 cases of mucoepidermoid carcinoma with histologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17:92–98.
24.
Klijanienko J, Vielh P: Fine-needle sample of salivary gland lesions. 5. Cytology of 22 cases of acinic cell carcinoma with histologic correlation. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17:347–352.
25.
Lewis DR, Webb AJ, Lott MF, Brookes ST, Farndon JR: Improving cytological diagnosis and surgical management of parotid adenolymphoma. Br J Surg 1999;86:1275–1279.
26.
Ballo MS, Shin HJ, Sneige N: Sources of diagnostic error in the fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of Warthin’s tumor and clues to a correct diagnosis. Diagn Cytopathol 1997;17:230–234.
27.
Raymond MR, Yoo JH, Heathcote JG, McLachlin CM, Lampe HB: Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration biopsy for Warthin’s tumours. J Otolaryngol 2002;31:263–270.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.