Objective: Although Warthin’s tumor (WT) is one of a few salivary gland tumors that have distinct cytologic findings, it can be confused with malignant tumors at times. We assessed the overall accuracy, unusual features, and diagnostic points of fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of WT. Study Design: We retrospectively collected histologically confirmed WT from 21 patients and reviewed preoperative FNA slides. Smears were subject to immunocytochemical staining for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and c-kit and compared to metastatic squamous cell carcinoma. Results: All of the cases were in the parotid gland; the mean size was 3.6 ± 1.2 cm. Of 21 patients, 19 were male (age 59.7 ± 9.4 years) and had a history of smoking. The initial FNA diagnoses were WT (11 patients, 52.4%), benign lesion (7 patients, 33.3%), and malignant neoplasm (3 patients, 14.3%). Only 6 patients (28.6%) showed typical FNA features of WT. The dominant cell types in the smears were macrophages (76.2%), squamous-like cells (66.7%), oncocytes (61.9%), and lymphoid cells (57.1%). Some showed atypical degenerated features, a necrotic background, and inflammatory cells, leading to misdiagnosis. CEA positivity and c-kit positivity in WT were noted in 0 and 75.0% of cases, respectively, whereas metastatic squamous cell carcinoma showed positive rates of 16.7 and 0%, respectively. Conclusion: Awareness of potential sources of misdiagnosis together with combination of c-kit/CEA immunostaining may result in an increased diagnostic rate of WT in FNA.

Keywords:
c-kit, Fine-needle aspiration, Misdiagnosis, Warthin’s tumor, Carcinoembryonic antigen
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.