Oral lesions are common in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients, which may indicate impairment of the patient’s general health status, and, in many cases, the oral lesions are the first sign of an HIV infection. Oral hairy leukoplakia (OHL) is a benign lesion of the oral mucosa related to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) observed in HIV-positive individuals. The aim of this study was to report the contribution of oral cytopathology in the investigation of the HIV/AIDS status of patients as well as in the clinical and subclinical identification of OHL. Three patients were referred to the Oral Medicine Clinic in 2010. The patients were submitted to oral examination, and scrapes of the tongue were obtained. The Papanicolaou staining technique was used, and cytopathological analysis showed nuclear changes corresponding to cytopathic effects of EBV epithelial infection and candidiasis. The final diagnosis was OHL and candidiasis. Based on cytopathological diagnosis, an HIV serologic test was requested which revealed positive HIV serology. None of the patients was aware of their HIV serological status, and thus the cytopathology, by identifying OHL, contributed to the early diagnosis of HIV/AIDS. Cytopathology should be used as a routine procedure and it may be the method of choice for clinical and subclinical OHL diagnosis.

1.
Johnson NW: The mouth in HIV/AIDS: markers of disease status and management challenges for the dental profession. Aust Dent J 2010;55(suppl 1):85–102.
2.
Sen S, Mandal S, Bhattacharya S, Halder S, Bhaumik P: Oral manifestations in human immunodeficiency virus infected patients. Indian J Dermatol 2010;55:116–118.
3.
Greenspan JS, Greenspan D, Lennette ET, Abrams DI, Conant MA, Petersen V, et al: Replication of Epstein-Barr virus within the epithelial cells of oral ‘hairy’ leukoplakia, an AIDS-associated lesion. N Engl J Med 1985;313:1564–1571.
4.
Birnbaum W, Hodgson TA, Reichart PA, Sherson W, Nittayannanta SW, Axell TE: Prognostic significance of HIV-associated oral lesions and their relation to therapy. Oral Dis 2002;8:110–114.
5.
Dias EP, Rocha ML, Silva Junior A, Spyrides KS, Ferreira SM, Polignano GA, et al: Oral hairy leukoplakia. Histopathologic and cytopathologic features of a subclinical phase. Am J Clin Pathol 2000;114:395–401.
6.
Mabruk MJ, Flint SR, Toner M, Leonard N, Sheils O, Coleman DC, et al: Detection of Epstein-Barr virus DNA in tongue tissues from AIDS autopsies without clinical evidence of oral hairy leukoplakia. J Oral Pathol Med 1995;24:109–112.
7.
Husak R, Garbe C, Orfanos CE: Oral hairy leukoplakia in 71 HIV-seropositive patients: clinical symptoms, relation to immunologic status, and prognostic significance. J Am Acad Dermatol 1996;35:928–934.
8.
Reginald A, Sivapathasundharam B: Oral hairy leukoplakia: an exfoliative cytology study. Oral Dis 2010;1:10–13.
9.
Fraga-Fernandez J, Vicandi-Plaza B: Diagnosis of hairy leukoplakia by exfoliative cytologic methods. Am J Clin Pathol 1992;97:262–266.
10.
Milagres A, Dias EP, Tavares D dos S, Cavalcante RM, Dantas VA, de Oliveira SP, et al: Prevalence of oral hairy leukoplakia and epithelial infection by Epstein-Barr virus in pregnant women and diabetes mellitus patients – cytopathologic and molecular study. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 2007;102:159–164.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.